Order Code RS21747
Updated March 10, 2006
CRS Report for Congress
Received through the CRS Web
Avian Influenza: Agricultural Issues
Jim Monke
Analyst in Agricultural Policy
Resources, Science, and Industry Division
Summary
Since the fall of 2003, a strain of highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1) has
spread throughout Asia, infecting mostly poultry but also a limited number of humans.
The virus reached Europe in 2005, and the Middle East and Africa in 2006. Avian flu
is highly contagious in domestic poultry. Strict biosecurity measures are practiced by
commercial poultry farms and encouraged by governments. The economic effects of
avian flu outbreaks can be significant, especially given international trade restrictions.
Controlling avian flu in poultry is seen as the best way to prevent a human
pandemic from developing, by reducing the number of animal hosts in which the virus
may evolve. This report mainly covers avian flu in poultry, and will be updated.
Two Forms with Many Strains
Avian influenza (AI) viruses exist throughout the world in many different strains.
Avian flu is an Influenza A virus that infects birds, and certain strains have been known
to infect both animals and humans. Avian flu is characterized by two forms in birds:1
! a low pathogenicity (LPAI) form that causes mild illness, and
! a highly pathogenic (HPAI) form that is extremely contagious, causes
severe illness, and frequently has high rates of mortality.
Both forms are possible in several strains. Strains are identified by two surface
proteins designated by the letters H and N.2 Some low pathogenicity strains (H5 and H7)
are capable of mutating into highly pathogenic strains, and thus are treated aggressively.
For example, in Italy in 1999, an H7 LPAI virus mutated into HPAI within nine months.
1 Tests for pathogenicity are conducted in two ways: through genetic (DNA) sequencing, and by
inoculating healthy chickens and monitoring their immune response and mortality over a 10-day
period. HPAI strains can result in greater or lesser rates of mortality, perhaps ranging from 30-
100%. LPAI strains typically do not exceed 10-20 percent mortality.
2 The surface proteins are called hemagglutinin and neuraminidase, abbreviated H and N. Sixteen
H subtypes and nine N subtypes have been identified, and they can occur in any combination.
Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

CRS-2
Because LPAI is endemic in wild birds, low pathogenicity outbreaks are not unusual.
The most recent domestic cases were in 2004 with low pathogenicity strains of H7N2 in
Delaware, Maryland, and New Jersey, and H2N2 in Pennsylvania. A strain classified as
HPAI H5N2 was found in Texas, although it did not manifest as highly pathogenic. Other
cases include low pathogenicity H7N2 in the Northeast in 2003, and in the mid-Atlantic
in 2002. Only three HPAI outbreaks have occurred domestically (1924, 1983, and 2004).
Status of Avian Influenza Outbreaks
In the United States.3 The highly pathogenic H5N1 strain of current global
concern has not reached the United States, neither in poultry nor humans. To reduce the
possibility that H5N1 enters U.S. borders, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
has blocked imports of poultry and poultry products from affected countries, and
increased smuggling interdiction efforts. The Department of Homeland Security helps
with enforcement through Customs and Border Protection.
Since wild birds can carry the disease, migratory birds routes are being monitored.
North American flyways are not believed to be as susceptible as Eastern Hemisphere
flyways that currently are spreading the virus. However, the United States has increased
surveillance where flyways overlap because officials suspect migrating birds in Asia could
carry the virus to Alaska this spring, and down the Pacific flyway in the fall of 2006.
Congressional Hearings. The House and Senate agriculture committees held
hearings on avian influenza on November 16 and 17, 2005, respectively. Witnesses from
the Administration, academia, and industry reviewed prevention and control efforts.4
In the Rest of the World.5 Since December 2003, at least 10 Asian countries
have had confirmed outbreaks of H5N1 in poultry, including Vietnam, Thailand,
Indonesia, Cambodia, China and Hong Kong, South Korea, Malaysia, Laos, and Japan.
In 2005, H5N1 spread westward, being confirmed in six new countries: Russia, Ukraine,
Kazakhstan, Turkey, Romania, and Croatia. In 2006, H5N1 spread further into Europe,
and entered the Middle East and Africa, being confirmed in at least 17 new countries: six
in domestic poultry (Iraq, Egypt, Nigeria, Niger, India, and France), and 11 in wild birds
(Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Greece, Slovenia, Hungary, Slovakia, Austria, Italy, Germany,
Switzerland, and Poland). Iran, Serbia-Montenegro, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Pakistan, and
Georgia have confirmed outbreaks of an H5 virus, but are awaiting results on the subtype.
3 For more on domestic poultry, see the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) at
[http://www.aphis.usda.gov/lpa/issues/avian_influenza]. For more on human issues, see the
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) at [http://www.cdc.gov/flu/avian].
4 House Agriculture Committee, “Review Issues Related to the Prevention, Detection, and
Eradication of Avian Influenza
,” Serial No. 109-21, November 16, 2005
[http://agriculture.house.gov/hearings/109/10921.pdf]. Senate Agriculture Committee, “Avian
Influenza: Role of U.S. agriculture to control and eradicate,” November 17, 2005
[http://agriculture.senate.gov/Hearings/hearings.cfm?hearingId=1691].
5 For international issues, see the World Health Organization (WHO) [http://www.who.int/csr/
disease/avian_influenza/en], U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
[http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/subjects/en/health/diseases-cards/special_avian.html], and the
World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) [http://www.oie.int/eng/avian_influenza].

CRS-3
The H5N1 outbreak is historically unprecedented and extremely challenging. The
U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that over 200 million birds have
died or been culled. Some countries were reluctant to acknowledge the disease for fear
of economic consequences. In other countries, lack of compensation for farmers whose
flocks are destroyed has been a disincentive to report outbreaks early. In some parts of
Asia and Africa, about 80% of the poultry are produced in small backyard farms.
International Control Efforts.6 As H5N1 spreads, it may become endemic in
countries with low levels of veterinary services or animal husbandry practices that harbor
the virus. Chances increase that the virus will evolve through mutation or reassortment
into a strain that could be transmitted easily between humans. Thus, FAO and the World
Health Organization (WHO) developed a strategy calling for the swift and coordinated
control of avian flu in poultry as the best way to prevent or delay a human pandemic from
developing, by reducing the number of animal hosts in which the virus may evolve.7
Transmission
Wild birds are the primary natural reservoir for Influenza A viruses and are often the
vector that introduces new outbreaks into domestic flocks. Wild birds often are resistant
to the virus and do not show clinical symptoms. The role of migratory birds is of
increasing concern, especially given the spread of the disease in 2006.
Avian flu is highly contagious in domestic poultry. The virus is spread by contact
with infected feces, nasal, or eye excretions. Human activity poses further risks when
people, clothing, vehicles, and supplies move between farms. Thus, strict biosecurity
measures are practiced among commercial poultry farms and are encouraged by USDA
and international organizations.8 Confined poultry sheds prevent contact with wild birds.
In the United States, avian flu viruses have been common in live bird markets
concentrated in ethnic or urban areas. Biosecurity practices are insufficient if birds and
equipment intermingle in the market or move back to farms. Thus sanitation of crates,
periodic disinfection of the market, and restrictions on moving birds back into general
farm populations are needed. USDA has focused on these markets as one of the first
places to control the disease. Live bird markets are a small portion of the U.S. poultry
industry (about 0.25%), but the frequency of outbreaks is of concern to the majority of
commercial growers practicing tighter biosecurity protocols. In Asia, a larger network of
live bird markets and the much larger number of small backyard farms have posed
significant problems for eradicating the disease.
6 For more on the international response, see CRS Report RL33219, U.S. and International
Responses to the Global Spread of Avian Flu: Issues for Congress
, coordinated by Tiaji
Salaam-Blyther and Emma Chanlett-Avery.
7 “A Global Strategy for the Progressive Control of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI),”
FAO and OIE, in cooperation with WHO, November 2005 [http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/
subjects/documents/ai/HPAIGlobalStrategy31Oct05.pdf], and “Avian Influenza Control and
Eradication: FAO’s Proposal for a Global Programme,” FAO, Jan. 2006 [http://www.fao.org/ag/
againfo/subjects/documents/ai/Global_Programme_Jan06.pdf].
8 For biosecurity recommendations, see the USDA “Biosecurity for the Birds” website at
[http://www.aphis.usda.gov/vs/birdbiosecurity/hpai.html].

CRS-4
Human Infection.9 Certain strains of avian flu can infect humans through close
poultry-to-human transmission, usually through contact with fecal matter or other live
bird excretions. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Organization for
Animal Health (OIE) conclude that avian flu is not a food-borne disease since the virus
is killed by the temperature reached in normal cooking. The Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) recommends standard food safety practices.
The human disease caused by H5N1 differs from typical human flu. H5N1 can
replicate in a wide range of cells, more so than the usual flu virus. This can result in a
severe disseminated disease affecting multiple organs, which has caused high rates of
mortality. Public health professionals are concerned that the virus could mutate or
combine with human flu viruses to allow efficient human-to-human transmission.
WHO has confirmed 176 human cases of H5N1from December 2003 to March 10,
2006, with 97 deaths (a 55% mortality rate). Seven countries have had human cases.
Vietnam (93 cases, 42 deaths) and Indonesia (28 cases, 21 deaths) have the most, with
Thailand, China, Turkey, Cambodia, and Iraq having fewer.
The first human cases of H5N1 were in Hong Kong in 1997. Two other strains have
caused human illness: H7N7 in the Netherlands, and H9N2 in Hong Kong.
Control
Avian flu in poultry is controlled domestically through prevention and eradication
by individual farmers in cooperation with state and federal governments, and with
industry associations. The USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
is the lead federal agency. Internationally, FAO has a joint response plan with WHO for
the current outbreak (see footnote 6).
Preventing Infection. Biosecurity practices are the most important means of
preventing outbreaks in poultry. This includes preventing access of wild birds to
domestic flocks and limiting access to farm buildings by outside conveyances. For
example, delivery trucks and personnel are cleaned and disinfected before entering a
farm’s biosecure area. In Asia and other parts of the world, the large number of small
farms or backyard flocks without biosecurity practices has posed greater problems for
control. Such animal husbandry practices are slow to change.
Vaccines. While vaccination of poultry is possible and has been used on a small
scale with some success, it generally is not considered a sufficient control method.10
Vaccination poses problems for international trade as many countries will not import
poultry products from other countries that use vaccination, since animals will test positive
9 For more on human issues, see CRS Report RL33145, Pandemic Influenza: Domestic
Preparedness Efforts
, by Sarah A. Lister.
10 Ilaria Capua and Stephano Marangon, “Vaccination for avian influenza in Asia,” Vaccine, 22
(2004), 4137-7138 [http://www.oie.int/eng/avian_influenza/vaccination%20in%20Asia.pdf], and
Ilaria Capua & Stephano Marangon, “The use of vaccination as an option for the control of avian
influenza,” May 2003, [http://www.oie.int/eng/avian_influenza/A_71%20SG_12_CS3E.pdf].

CRS-5
for antibodies. If vaccination is not administered and monitored correctly, it can allow
the virus to become endemic and continue to spread or mutate.
In November 2005, USDA had a stockpile of 40 million doses of vaccine (for two
types of H5 and two types of H7 viruses). USDA plans to double this stockpile with
supplemental funds appropriated for avian flu in December 2005 (discussed below).
Eradicating Outbreaks. Because the virus is highly contagious and easily spread
in poultry, the most common method of control after there is an outbreak is culling (also
called “stamping out,” depopulating) the infected flocks, and certain flocks in close
proximity to the infected flock. Following depopulation, buildings and equipment are
rigorously disinfected before new birds are allowed, a process that takes at least several
weeks. The virus is killed by common disinfectants or heat (about 160 degrees F).
Domestic outbreaks usually are managed through joint federal, state, and industry
cooperation. States usually lead the response in terms of depopulation and quarantines
of surrounding areas which are imposed until the disease is eradicated. APHIS provides
personnel and equipment to advise and supplement state resources. In highly pathogenic
outbreaks, APHIS may take a larger role. Federal statute allows the destruction of
affected animals (9 CFR 53.4). The USDA National Veterinary Services Lab (NVSL)
conducts confirmatory tests on the pathogenicity and type of virus. USDA also works to
limit export restrictions (such as to states or counties) and reopen export markets.
Indemnities to Farmers. Compensation programs are desired to encourage
farmers to report outbreaks and cooperate with control programs when culling is needed.
States generally manage indemnification programs for low pathogenicity outbreaks.
Some industry associations, such as those on the Delmarva peninsula (Delaware,
Maryland, and Virginia), have compensation funds. In the past, USDA has not had a
compensation program for LPAI.11 However, a new low pathogenicity indemnification
program was developed in FY2005. USDA’s standard indemnification rate for low
pathogenicity programs is 50% of fair market value. For highly pathogenic outbreaks,
statute allows USDA to offer 100% indemnification (9 CFR 53.2).
Federal Appropriations to Control Avian Flu in Poultry
For FY2007, USDA requests $82 million for avian flu: $77 million for APHIS and
$5.4 million for agricultural research. Of the amount for APHIS, $56.7 million would be
for monitoring and surveillance of HPAI, and $16.7 million for management of LPAI.
For FY2006, the regular appropriation to APHIS for its LPAI program is $13.8
million (but with carryover, $28.3 million is available, with about $12 million for
indemnities; P.L. 109-97, H.Rept. 109-255). In addition, Congress appropriated USDA
$91.4 million in emergency supplemental funds as part of $3.8 billion for pandemic
influenza (Division B, Title II, of P.L. 109-148). From the supplemental, APHIS received
$71.5 million for domestic surveillance, diagnosis, and vaccine stockpiles; and
international technical assistance for surveillance, biosecurity, and control. The
Agricultural Research Service received $7 million in the supplemental.
11 A limited indemnification program was created for an LPAI outbreak in 2002 (9 CFR 53.11).

CRS-6
In other international, agricultural aid, the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations
Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-13) provided $25 million to the U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID) and CDC to combat avian flu. Conferees encourage cooperation
with FAO and WHO on a joint international plan (footnote 6). The $140 million, three-
year FAO/WHO plan is being implemented but is not fully funded by donor countries.
Economic Impacts
Avian flu can affect the agricultural economy significantly. Usually, direct costs
include culling birds and quarantining farms. Larger economic effects arise from
international trade bans which affect farms outside the quarantine area. However, in the
current H5N1 outbreak, global consumer confidence is increasingly at stake despite
official statements that normal cooking would kill any virus if it was present.
If consumer confidence remains high, demand for healthy poultry may rise. If
consumer confidence declines, poultry prices may drop and demand for substitute meats
may increase. As poultry production falls, demand for feed such as corn and soy meal
may decrease. Poultry account for about one-third of total world feed use.
Through most of 2005, the global impact on feed and poultry consumption was
limited due to relatively quick recovery of production where outbreaks were contained,
since poultry production cycles are quite short at about eight weeks. However, the rapid
geographic spread of the virus in 2006 is reducing consumer demand for poultry in
Europe and Africa. FAO reports poultry consumption dropped 70% in Italy during
February 2006, 20% in France, and 10% in northern Europe. In the United States, export
prices dropped 13% from declining shipments to Eastern Europe and Central Asia in
November and Decmeber of 2005.12
The United States is the world’s largest producer and exporter of poultry meat and
the second-largest egg producer. USDA estimates that about 8.5 billion broilers were
produced in 2003, and farm sales of poultry were worth $23.3 billion (out of $105 billion
for all livestock, and $200 billion including crops). Broiler production was $15.2 billion,
followed by eggs at $5.3 billion, and turkeys at $2.7 billion. Five states account for 60%
of U.S. production: Georgia (15%), Arkansas (14%), Alabama (13%), Mississippi (9%),
and North Carolina (9%). The U.S. exports about 16% of its poultry production.
No economic estimates of an H5N1 outbreak in the United States are provided
because of the highly uncertain nature of any possible, hypothetical outbreak. The 1983-
84 outbreak of highly pathogenic avian flu in the United States caused the destruction of
17 million birds and cost $65 million.
12 FAO, “Escalating bird flu crisis jeopardizes global poultry trade prospects,” Feb. 28, 2006
[http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/2006/1000240/index.html], and USDA Economic
Research Service, “Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook,” February 15, 2006 (monthly),
[http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/ldp].