Order Code RS21238
Updated May 2, 2005
CRS Report for Congress
Received through the CRS Web
Uzbekistan: Recent Developments
and U.S. Interests
Jim Nichol
Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs
Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division
Summary
Uzbekistan is an emerging Central Asian regional power by virtue of its relatively
large population, energy and other resources, and location in the heart of the region. It
has made limited progress in economic and political reforms, and many observers
criticize its human rights record. This report discusses U.S. policy and assistance. Basic
facts and biographical information are provided. This report may be updated. Related
products include CRS Issue Brief IB93108, Central Asia, updated regularly.
U.S. Policy1
According to the Administration, Uzbekistan
is a “key strategic partner” in the Global War on
Terrorism and “one of the most influential
countries in Central Asia.” However, Uzbekistan’s
poor record on human rights, democracy, and
religious freedom complicates its relations with the
United States. U.S. assistance to Uzbekistan seeks
to enhance the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and
security of Uzbekistan; diminish the appeal of
extremism by strengthening civil society and urging
respect for human rights; bolster the development
of natural resources such as oil; and address
humanitarian needs (State Department,
Congressional Presentation for Foreign Operations for FY2006). Because of its location
and power potential, some U.S. policymakers argue that Uzbekistan should receive the
most U.S. attention in the region.
1 Sources for this report include the Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS), Central
Eurasia: Daily Report; Eurasia Insight; RFE/RL Central Asia Report; the State Department’s
Washington File; and Reuters, Associated Press (AP), and other newswires.
Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

---

CRS-2
Cumulative U.S. FREEDOM
Basic Facts
Support Act and agency humanitarian
Area and Population: Land area is 174,486 sq. mi.,
and technical assistance budgeted for
slightly larger than California. The population is 25.1 mil-
lion (2004 est., Commonwealth of Independent States
Uzbekistan in FY1992-FY2004 was
Statistics Committee). Administrative subdivisions include
$646.0 million (by comparison, EU
the Karakalpak Republic.
grants and loans amounted to about
Ethnicity: 80% are Uzbek, 5.5% Russian, 5% Tajik, 3%
$159 million). For FY2005, $48.7
Kazakh, 2.5% Karakalpak, 1.5% Tatar, and others (2003
million is planned for Uzbekistan,
CIA Factbook, 1996 est.). Uzbeks are the most numerous
Central Asian nationality. There are more than 1.2 million
and the Administration has requested
Uzbeks residing in Afghanistan, one million in Tajikistan,
$37.4 m illi on for FY2006
and a half-million in Kyrgyzstan.
(FREEDOM Support Act and other
Gross Domestic Product: $11.9 billion in 2004; per
foreign aid, excluding Defense and
capita GDP is about $474 (Uzbek State Statistics
Committee est., current prices).
E n e r gy D e partment funds ) .
Political Leaders: President: Islam Karimov; Prime
Bolstering the Uzbek military’s
Minister: Shavkat Mirziyoyev; Speaker of the Legislative
capabilities to combat terrorism and
Chamber: Erkin Xalilov; Speaker of the Senate: Murod
trafficking in weapons, persons, and
Sharifxojayev; Foreign Minister: Elyor Ganiyev; Defense
narcotics “will contribute immensely
Minister: Qodir Ghulomov
Biography: Karimov, born in 1938, in 1983 became
to U.S. interests and regional
Uzbek Minister of Finance, and then Deputy Chairman of
s e c u r i t y ” ( C o n g r e s s i o n a l
the Uzbek Council of Ministers. In 1989, he became First
Presentation). Foreign Military
Secretary of the Uzbek Communist Party. In 1990, the
Financing (FMF) is proposed for
Uzbek Supreme Soviet elected him to the newly created
communications and other equipment
post of President, and he also became a member of the
Soviet Communist Party Politburo. In December 1991, he
useful for border control and river
was popularly elected President, winning 86% of the vote
patrols and to support programs for
against opposition Erk Party candidate Mohammed Solikh.
non-commissioned officers (NCOs).
In 1995, Karimov orchestrated a popular referendum to
International Military Education and
extend his presidency until 2000, won re-election, and in
2002 orchestrated another to extend his term until 2007.
Training (IMET) funds is proposed to
support the development of an NCO
corps and for mountain training,
infantry training, special forces training, border security training, civil-military relations,
and emergency and disaster response. Funds for regional Science Centers and Bio-
Chemical Redirect programs are proposed to retrain scientists to engage in research on
arid land agriculture, seed crop development, water quality, and human and animal health.
Law enforcement assistance is proposed to support Uzbek police cooperation with the
U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and to improve the treatment of suspects and
prisoners and end the use of torture. Because political reform is lagging, FY2006 aid is
proposed for promoting human rights, assisting the development of independent political
parties, supporting independent television and radio stations and non-governmental
organizations (NGOs), and fostering an independent judiciary and legal corps. Besides
bilateral aid, the United States also contributes to international and non-governmental
organizations that aid Uzbekistan.
Concerns about WMD proliferation led the Administration at the end of 2003 to
waive restrictions on most anti-terrorism aid to Uzbekistan under authority provided by
the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2003 (P.L.107-314). The Administration
indicated that Uzbekistan had not satisfied Congressional requirements to respect human
rights, as contained in Sec.1203(d)(6) of the Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) Act of
1993 (P.L.103-160), making the waiver necessary. The waiver authority was exercised
again on December 14, 2004 for FY2005 funding.

---

CRS-3
Since FY2003, Congress also has prohibited FREEDOM Support Act assistance to
the central government of Uzbekistan unless the Secretary of State determines and reports
that Uzbekistan is making substantial progress in meeting commitments to respect human
rights, establish a multiparty system, and ensure free and fair elections, freedom of
expression, and the independence of the media (P.L.108-7; P.L.108-199; P.L. 108-447).
Congress received a determination of progress in FY2003. In July 2004, State
Department spokesman Richard Boucher announced that some FY2004 military and
economic aid to Uzbekistan would be withheld because of “lack of progress on
democratic reform and restrictions put on U.S. assistance partners.” IMET and FMF
programs — which are conditioned on respect for human rights — were among those
affected. Ultimately, reprogramming and the use of notwithstanding authority resulted
in about $8.5 million being withheld. Some aid may be similarly withheld in FY2005.
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Richard Myers, during an August 2004
visit to Uzbekistan, criticized the cutoff of IMET and FMF programs as “shortsighted”
and not “productive,” since it reduced U.S. military influence. Reportedly, he announced
boosted nonproliferation aid of $21 million and the transfer of fourteen patrol boats worth
$2.9 million, perhaps to reassure the Uzbeks of U.S. interest in their security.
Contributions to the Campaign Against Terrorism
In her testimony on April 8, 2004, to the Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the
United States, then-National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice emphasized that early
Administration efforts to counter global terrorism — before the September 11, 2001,
terrorist attacks on the United States — included increasing cooperation with Uzbekistan.
These ties proved useful in soliciting Uzbek support for Operation Enduring Freedom
(OEF) in Afghanistan. A formal agreement on U.S. use of the Khanabad airbase, near the
town of Karshi (termed the K2 base) was signed on October 7, and a joint statement
pledged the two sides to consult in the event of a threat to Uzbekistan’s security and
territorial integrity. In March 2002, the two sides signed a “Strategic Partnership” accord
that reiterated this nonspecific security guarantee to consult “on an urgent basis.” The
United States also pledged military aid, and Uzbekistan pledged to “intensify democratic
transformation” and increase media freedom. In early 2003, Uzbekistan was the only
Central Asian state that joined the “coalition of the willing” that endorsed prospective
U.S.-led coalition military operations in Iraq, but Karimov balked at sending troops.
Uzbekistan has benefitted from its alliance with the United States. In addition to
security assurances and increased military and other aid, U.S. forces have helped
eliminate much of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU; a terrorist group based in
Afghanistan and dedicated to the forceful establishment of Islamic rule in Uzbekistan).
Not only were IMU bases destroyed in Afghanistan, but IMU military leader Juma
Namanganiy was reportedly killed.
Foreign Policy and Defense
Home to more than half the population of Central Asia, Uzbekistan seeks to play a
leading role in regional affairs. Karimov’s priority in foreign policy has been to seek
closer security ties with the United States, while maintaining working relations with
Russia that do not overly compromise its independence. Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia,
and other Central Asian states signed a Collective Security Treaty in 1992 which calls for

---

CRS-4
mutual assistance in the case of aggression against the parties. Uzbekistan withdrew from
this pact in 1999, citing sovereignty issues. In 2001, Uzbekistan joined the Shanghai
Cooperation Organization (SCO; other members are China, Russia, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan) and in 2003 insisted on hosting the SCO Regional Anti-
Terrorism Center. In April 2004, he criticized SCO members for failing to aid Uzbekistan
during the March-April 2004 attacks and concluded that Uzbekistan should “rely on its
own power.” Uzbekistan has ongoing tensions with other Central Asian states. In 1998,
the Tajik president accused Uzbekistan of supporting an uprising in northern Tajikistan,
and in 2002, the Turkmen government accused Uzbek officials of conspiring to overthrow
it. To safeguard its borders from terrorism, Uzbekistan mined its borders with Tajikistan
and Kyrgyzstan in 1999, causing grievances.
The Uzbek military is the most advanced among those of the Central Asian states.
The armed forces consist of 50-55,000 troops in ground and air forces. There are also 17-
19,000 internal security (police) troops and 1,000 national guard troops (The Military
Balance 2004-2005). Physicist Qodir Ghulomov is the first civilian defense minister in
the CIS. Uzbekistan’s military doctrine proclaims that it makes no territorial claims on
other states and adheres to nuclear non-proliferation. Military cooperation between
Russia and Uzbekistan is ensured through a 1992 Friendship Treaty, a 1994 military
treaty, and a 1999 accord on combating terrorism and Islamic extremism, though in recent
years Uzbekistan has worked to build up its own defenses, industries, and schools.
Uzbekistan also has played an active role in NATO’s Partnership for Peace (PFP) since
1994 by participating in military exercises and training, including in the United States.
On February 16, 1999, six bomb blasts in Tashkent’s governmental area by various
reports killed 16-28 and wounded 100-351. In response, the government arrested dozens
of suspects, including political dissidents. The motives for the bombing remain murky,
but Karimov termed them an assassination attempt. He alleged that exiled Erk Party
leader Mohammad Solikh led the plot, assisted by Afghanistan’s Taliban and IMU co-
leader Tahir Yuldashev. Solikh denied any role in the bombings. In November 2000,
Yuldashev and Namanganiy received death sentences and Solikh 15.5 years in prison (all
in absentia). Another defendant tried in absentia, Najmiddin Jalolov (see below),
received 18 years. Other security threats included the invasion of neighboring Kyrgyzstan
in July-August 1999 by several hundred IMU and other Islamic extremists. They were
rumored to be seeking to create an Islamic state in south Kyrgyzstan as a springboard for
a jihad in Uzbekistan. By mid-October 1999, they had been forced out of Kyrgyzstan.
Uzbekistan assisted with air strikes, border troops, and materiel. The next August, dozens
of IMU and other guerrillas again invaded Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, but were expelled
by late October. In September 2000, the State Department designated the IMU as a
Foreign Terrorist Organization, stating that the IMU actively threatens U.S. interests and
attacks American citizens, and stressing that the “United States supports the right of
Uzbekistan to defend [itself against] the violent actions of the IMU.”
A series of bombings and armed attacks began in Uzbekistan on March 28, 2004, and
continued through April 1, reportedly killing 47 individuals. President Karimov asserted
that the attacks were aimed against his government to “cause panic among our people,
[and] to make them lose their trust.” U.S. Air Force Secretary James Roche and Lt. Gen.
David Barno, Combined Forces Commander for Afghanistan, visited Uzbekistan in April
2004, with Barno stressing that “we stand with Uzbekistan in facing down this terrorist
menace.” An obscure Islamic Jihad Group of Uzbekistan (IJG; Jama’at al-Jihad al-Islami,

---

CRS-5
reportedly an alias of the IMU) claimed responsibility for the violence. Fifteen suspects
(all of whom confessed their guilt) were sentenced in late August 2004 to 11-16 years in
prison. Some of them testified that Jalolov was the leader of IJG, that they were trained
by Arabs and others at camps in Kazakhstan and Pakistan, and that the IJG was linked to
Hizb ut-Tahrir, the Taliban, Uighur extremists, and Al Qaeda. During this trial,
explosions occurred in Tashkent on July 30, 2004, at the U.S. and Israeli embassies and
the Uzbek Prosecutor-General’s Office. The IMU and IJG claimed responsibility and
stated that the bombings were aimed against the trial and “apostate” governments. U.S.
concerns about the ongoing attacks include increased instability that could affect the
security and future of K2, reduce coalition access to Afghanistan by air or ground, and
heighten the danger of trafficking in WMD technology and know-how.
Political and Economic Developments
In January 2005, Karimov proclaimed that he backed the creation of three powerful
branches of government, to correct a situation where “everything now depends on me.”
He explained that “I simply had to take on all of the responsibility” of governing
Uzbekistan after the collapse of the Soviet Union, but that in the future, a strong
legislature and judiciary would prevent dictatorship. In January 2002, Karimov
orchestrated a constitutional referendum to create a bicameral legislature, termed the Oliy
Majlis (Supreme Assembly) and to extend his term to seven years. In April 2002,
Karimov introduced legislation to set up a 120-member, directly-elected lower chamber,
the Legislative Chamber, and a 100-member upper chamber, the Senate. He proposed
that the Senate be composed of 16 members he would appoint, with the rest selected by
14 local legislatures. He proposed that the lower chamber have most of the responsibility
for drafting laws and, in December 2002, called for the Senate to have the power to
confirm the prime minister and other top officials, arguing that this would keep a future
president from grasping for absolute power. Constitutional amendments approved in
April 2003 established that — after the next presidential election — the prime minister
ostensibly would exercise greater power. A law approved in April 2003 provides ex-
presidents with immunity from prosecution, a legislative seat, and a pension criticized by
some Uzbeks as extravagant.
In December 2004, Karimov stated that “the OSCE should not artificially try to
create [opposition] that does not exist” among the citizenry. Only pro-Karimov parties
operate legally: the Popular Democratic Party (PDP), founded by Karimov; the Fidokorlar
(Self-Sacrifice) National Democracy Party, created by Karimov as a youth party; the
Adolat (Justice) Social Democratic Party; the Liberal-Democratic Party, consisting of
government-connected businessmen; and the National Revival Party, consisting of state-
supported intellectuals. Since 2003, the government has permitted the banned opposition
parties Birlik (Unity), Erk (Will), and Ozod Dehqonlar (Free Farmers; formed in late
2003) to hold meetings but repeatedly has found fault with their bids to obtain legal status.
In January 2005, Karimov suggested that the PDP call itself an “opposition” party.
The last presidential race was in January 2000. The two candidates were incumbent
President Karimov and Abdulkhafiz Jalolov. Jalolov was nominated by the PDP —
which he headed after Karimov resigned as head in 1996 — to give the appearance of a
contest. Jalolov endorsed Karimov during the campaign. Karimov won 91.9% of 12.1
million votes cast. The State Department concluded that “this election was neither free
nor fair.” The next presidential election is scheduled for 2007.

---

CRS-6
In the run-up to the December 26, 2004, Legislative Chamber elections, the
government restricted freedom of speech and assembly. In February 2004, the
government decreed that foreign grants to non-governmental organizations (NGOs) had
to be administered by the government. It also accused the National Democratic Institute
(NDI), International Republican Institute (IRI), and Freedom House of engaging in
subversion, prompting the State Department to call for the unhindered operation of groups
assisting Uzbekistan to carry out its commitments under the 2002 Strategic Partnership
Agreement. A limited OSCE observer mission concluded that the December 2004
legislative race “fell significantly short of ... international standards for democratic
elections.” It also stated that “the relevant principles necessary for a meaningful
democratic election process, such as freedom of expression, association and assembly,
were not respected.” Members of parties not allowed to participate attempted to form
dozens of citizens’ groups to register candidates, but government officials found fault
with these registration attempts, according to the OSCE. The lack of open information
about the race contributed to low public interest and in less than a 50% turnout in half the
districts, triggering required run-offs on January 9, 2005. Two weeks later, local
legislatures, overseen by members of the Central Electoral Commission, selected
members of the Senate.
The State Department’s Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2004
reported that Uzbekistan’s human rights remained very poor and it continued to commit
numerous serious abuses. The government took some steps to address torture and to
establish police accountability but made no progress on democratic reform and increased
harassment of NGOs and media. Police and security forces tortured, beat, and harassed
persons, including religious extremists, human rights activists, and political dissidents,
but allowed international human rights groups to investigate alleged deaths in custody.
Prison conditions generally remained poor, although there were limited improvements in
some prisons. The number of persons in prison for political or religious reasons was
estimated to be between 5,000 and 5,500. The government severely restricted freedom
of speech and the press and continued to prohibit unauthorized public meetings and
demonstrations. Police forcibly disrupted several peaceful protests, although fewer than
in previous years. In early 2005, the government closed down IRI. Indicative of rising
discontent, hundreds rioted in a town in Uzbekistan in April 2005, protesting against
increasing political, economic, and religious repression.
During the 1990s, President Karimov maintained a high degree of state ownership
of production, subsidized some basic goods and services, and put restrictions on trade and
currency conversion. The economy began to turn around in 1996, but growth remains
sluggish. Uzbekistan in 2003 finally permitted its currency to be freely convertible but
vitiated the reform by reducing money in circulation, closing borders, and placing punitive
tariffs on imports. These restrictions have fueled organized crime, corruption, consumer
shortages, unemployment, and wage arrears. The World Bank reports that the quality of
life for most of the population has improved little or deteriorated in terms of healthcare,
education, housing, and income. Uzbekistan is the world’s fifth largest cotton producer,
and about 30% of the country’s economic activity is based on agriculture. The
government closely controls this sector. The European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development announced in 2004 that it would sharply limit its lending to Uzbekistan,
citing the country’s failure to register opposition parties, the continuing torture of
prisoners, media restrictions, and inadequate payments to cotton producers and laborers.

---