Order Code IB85159
CRS Issue Brief for Congress
Received through the CRS Web
Military Retirement:
Major Legislative Issues
Updated July 28, 2004
Robert L. Goldich
Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division

Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

---

CONTENTS
SUMMARY
MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
Military Retirement: Key Elements and Issues
Conceptual and Political Setting
Program Summary
“Redux”: Its 1986 Enactment and 1999 Repeal
Entitlement to Retired Pay and Retired Pay Computation Base
Retired Pay Computation Formula
Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA), 1992-2001 (FY1993-FY2001)
Military Retired Pay and Social Security
Retired Pay and Survivor Benefit COLAs
What Was the Last COLA and What Will be the Next COLA?
COLAs for Pre-August 1, 1986 Entrants
COLAs for Personnel Who Entered Service On or After August 1, 1986
Military Retirement Budgeting and Costs
Accounting for Military Retirement in the Federal Budget
Unfunded Liability
Military Retirement Cost Trends
Cost Concerns about Recent Retiree Benefit Increases
Concurrent Receipt of Military Retired Pay and VA Disability Compensation
Military Retired Pay and VA Disability Compensation: Overview
Repeal of “Special Compensation” For Severely Disabled Retirees
“Combat Related Special Compensation” (CRSC): Enacted in 2002 and
Expanded in 2003
Concurrent Receipt for Retirees with 50% or Greater Disability
Concurrent Receipt and CRSC:Eligibility of Military Disability Retirees
Congressional Action on Concurrent Receipt in 2004 (FY2005)
Costs and Numbers of Beneficiaries of Concurrent Receipt/CRSC
Pros and Cons of Concurrent Receipt
Veterans Disability Benefits Commission

---

IB85159
07-28-04
Military Retirement: Major Legislative Issues
SUMMARY
The military retirement system includes
tions and training generally, as distinct from
benefits for retirement after an active or re-
those whose injuries are unrelated to military
serve military career, disability retirement, and
service but incurred while in service. CRSC
survivor benefits for eligible survivors of
provides for payments that are the financial
deceased retirees.
equivalent of concurrent receipt.
Concurrent Receipt. The proposed
The FY2004 NDAA (P.L. 108-136,
change to the system that has generated the
November 24, 2003), for the first time pro-
most recent legislative activity involves
vided the concurrent receipt or its practical
whether some or all military retirees should be
and financial equivalence to large numbers of
allowed to receive both military retired pay
military retirees. The law, effective January 1,
and any VA disability compensation to which
2004, (1) authorized the payment of CRSC to
they are otherwise entitled; this is referred to
all otherwise eligible military retirees, regard-
as “concurrent receipt.” Until 2004, the law
less of their percentage of disability; (2) au-
provided that military retired pay had be
thorized a ten-year phase-in of concurrent
reduced by the amount of VA disability com-
receipt for all military retirees whose disability
pensation. Some maintained this was inequi-
is 50% or greater, regardless of the origins of
table and unfair; it was defended on grounds
their disability; and (3) included (hitherto
of cost and of the need to avoid setting a
almost completely excluded) reserve retirees.
precedent for concurrent receipt of numerous
It has been estimated that up to 300,000 retir-
other federal benefits. DOD has estimated
ees will be eligible for CRSC or concurrent
that up to 700,000 military retirees (out of a
receipt according to the new law’s criteria.
total of 1.7 million) would be eligible for
unrestricted concurrent receipt if enacted.
On June 23, 2004, the Senate passed its
version of the FY2005 NDAA (S. 2400).
Starting in 1999 (FY2000), provisions in
Included in it was Senator Harry Reid’s
each year’s annual National Defense Authori-
amendment to allow immediate (rather than a
zation Act (NDAA) authorized payments to
10-year phase in period) concurrent receipt for
comparatively small groups (in the tens of
military retirees with a 100% service-con-
thousands) of military retirees in lieu of con-
nected disability passed the Senate. There is
current receipt. The program enacted in 2002,
no concurrent receipt provision in the House
in the FY2003 NDAA (P.L. 107-314) , is
version of the FY2005 NDAA. Conference
known as “Combat Related Special
action will almost certainly not take place
Compensation” (CRSC), although it applies
until after the August 2004 recess.
also to those people injured in military opera-
Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

---

IB85159
07-28-04
MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
On June 23, 2004, the Senate passed its version of the FY2005 National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA), S. 2400, which contains Senator Harry Reid’s amendment to
allow immediate (rather than a 10-year phase in period) concurrent receipt for military
retirees with a 100% service-connected disability.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
Military Retirement: Key Elements and Issues
Conceptual and Political Setting
Congress confronts both constituent concerns and budgetary constraints in considering
military retirement issues. The approximately 2.0 million military retirees and survivor
benefit recipients, and their roughly six to eight million family members, have been, and
continue to be, an articulate and well-educated constituent group familiar with the legislative
process and represented by associations staffed with military retirees with long experience
in working with Congress. In recent years, the long-standing efforts by military retirees and
their associations to secure more benefits for their members have been buttressed by (1) the
outpouring of nationwide nostalgia and support for the past heroism and current old-age
needs of the “greatest generation” of World War II-era veterans, whether retirees or not; (2)
concern over problems the military services were having in recruiting and retaining sufficient
numbers of qualified personnel, which began in the mid-1990s, and the extent to which
actual or perceived inadequacies in retirement benefits may have been contributing to these
problems; (3) the impression by many current or former military personnel that the Clinton
Administration was not favorably disposed toward the military as an institution, leading to
efforts to portray increased retirement benefits as a palliative, and (4) in a reversal of the
attitudes toward the Clinton Administration, efforts to obtain more benefits from the Bush
Administration because it is perceived as being pro-military. And, since September 11,
2001, there has been a predictably dramatic increase in public and congressional support for
the Armed Forces.
In addition, it can be posited that the policy choices posed by recently-enacted increased
benefits for military retirees are an integral part of a larger debate in the United States over
the distribution of pension-type resources among younger workers and older retirees. In the
defense context, it may take the form of tensions between DOD and current active duty and
reserve military personnel, with the responsibility of defending the United States in the
present, and retired military personnel, many of whom feel that they are losing benefits to
which they assumed they would always have access. On the other hand, it can be argued
that, in a defense budget over $400 billion yearly, benefits that cost the DOD budget only $7-
8 billion yearly are not significant enough to force serious policy choices between current
defense capability on the one hand, and, on the other, pensions for those who, despite their
patriotic service, are not providing any current defense capability.
CRS-1

---

IB85159
07-28-04
In general, in recent years Congress has been more aggressive than the executive branch
in responding to the stated concerns of retirees about their benefits. The Department of
Defense (DOD) and other executive branch agencies have, over time, tended to regard
military retirement benefits as a place where substantial budgetary savings could be made.
For instance, as noted below, Congress took the initiative in 1999 to repeal the “Redux” cuts
in future military retired pay that was originally enacted in 1986.
Program Summary
In FY2004, total federal budget outlays for military retirement will be an estimated
$36.7 billion and DOD budget outlays will be an estimated $12.5 billion. (The differing
figures for total federal and DOD outlays result from the use of the accrual method in
accounting for the costs of military retirement. See the section below on Cost Data for a
discussion of accrual accounting. These numbers, taken from Table 2, below, also differ
slightly from those in Table 1, immediately below, for purely technical reasons without
policy significance.) Table 1 shows the estimated numbers of retirees, and the costs to the
federal government of the retired pay they receive, for FY2003-FY2005.
Table 1. DOD Retired Military Personnel and Survivors:
Estimated Numbers and Costs, FY2003-FY2005
Retirees from
Survivor
an Active Duty
Disability
Reserve
Benefit
Total
Military Career Retirees
Retirees
Recipients
FY2005
2,051,000/
1,392,000/
86,000/
274,000/
299,000/
(est)
$37.69 billion
$31.01 billion
$1.18 billion
$3.17 billion
$2.33 billion
FY2004
2,029,000/
1,386,000/
88,000/
266,000/
289,000/
(est)
$36.67 billion
$30.25 billion
$1.20 billion
$3.00 billion
$2.22 billion
FY2003
2,006,000/
1,379,000/
91,000/
258,000/
278,000/
(actual)
$35.73 billion
$29.56 billion
$1.22 billion
$2.84 billion
$2.11 billion
Sources: Office of the Actuary. Department of Defense. Valuation of the Military Retirement System.
September 30, 2002: K-8, K-10, K-14, K-16, L-2, and L-4. Document available online from the Office of the
DOD Actuary at [http://www.defenselink.mil/actuary/].
“Redux”: Its 1986 Enactment and 1999 Repeal
Cuts in retired pay for future retirees were enacted in the Military Retirement Reform
Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-348, July 1, 1986; the “1986 Act,” now referred to frequently as the
“Redux” military retirement system). Although enactment of Redux in 1986 represented a
success for those who argued that the pre-Redux system was too generous, the repeal of
compulsory Redux in late 1999 by the FY2000 National Defense Authorization Act indicated
that, at least in Congress, those who defend the pre-Redux system are again ascendant.
Congress began taking notice publicly of potential problems related to Redux in 1997,
well before the executive branch addressed the issue. During the fall of 1998, the
Administration announced that it supported Redux repeal. Eventually, the FY2000 National
CRS-2

---

IB85159
07-28-04
Defense Authorization Act contained provisions for repealing compulsory Redux; it allows
post-August 1, 1986 entrants to retire under the pre-Redux system or opt for Redux plus an
immediate $30,000 cash payment(see below).
Entitlement to Retired Pay and Retired Pay Computation Base
A service member becomes entitled to retired pay upon completion of 20 years of
service, regardless of age. (The average nondisabled enlisted member retiring from an active
duty military career in FY2003 was 43 years old and had 22 years of service; the average
officer was 48 years old and had 24 years of service.)1 A member who retires from active
duty is paid an immediate monthly annuity based on a percentage of his or her retired pay
computation base. For persons who entered military service before September 8, 1980, the
retired pay computation base is final monthly basic pay being received at the time of
retirement. For those who entered service on or after September 8, 1980, the computation
base is the average of the highest three years (36 months) of basic pay. (Basic pay is one
component of total Regular Military Compensation, or RMC, which consists of basic pay,
housing and subsistence allowances, and the federal tax advantage that accrues because the
allowances are not taxable. Basic pay comprises approximately 70% of the total for all
retirement eligibles: 75% for 30-year retirees and 66% for 20-year retirees. Thus, the 20-
year retiree may get 50% of retired pay computation base upon retirement, but only 33% of
RMC. The 30-year retiree will receive 75% of the computation base, but only 56% of RMC.
Nor do any of these calculations include any of the many special pays, bonuses or other cash
compensation to which many military members are entitled.)
Retired Pay Computation Formula
Military Personnel Who First Entered the Service before August 1, 1986.
All military personnel who first entered military service before August 1, 1986, have their
retired pay computed at the rate of 2.5% of the retired pay computation base for each year
of service. The minimum amount of retired pay to which a member entitled to compute his
or her retired pay under this formula is therefore 50% of the retired pay computation base
(20 years of service X 2.5%). A 25-year retiree receives 62.5% of the computation base (25
years of service X 2.5%). The maximum, reached at the 30-year mark, is 75% of the
computation base (30 years of service X 2.5%).
Military Personnel Who First Entered the Service on or after August 1,
1986. Personnel who first enter service on or after August 1, 1986, in accordance with the
provisions of the FY2000 National Defense Authorization Act, are required to select one of
two options in calculating their retired pay within 180 days of reaching 15 years of service:
Option 1: Pre-Redux. They can opt to have their retired pay computed in
accordance with the pre-Redux formula, described above, but with a slightly modified COLA
formula, which is less generous than that of the pre-Redux formula (see below, under
COLAs).
1 DOD Office of the Actuary. Fiscal Year 2003 DOD Statistical Report on the Military Retirement
System. July 2004: 84, 99.
CRS-3

---

IB85159
07-28-04
Option 2: Redux. They can opt to have their retired pay computed in accordance
with the Redux formula and receive an immediate $30,000 cash bonus (which can actually
be paid in several annual installments if the recipient so wishes, for tax purposes).
The Redux Formula: Under Age 62 Retirees. Redux is different from the previous
formula in two major ways. First, for retirees under age 62, retired pay will be computed at
the rate of 2.0% of the retired pay computation base for each year of service through 20, and
3.5% for each year of service from 21-30. Under this new formula, therefore, a 20-year
retiree will receive 40% of his or her retired pay computation base upon retirement (20 years
of service X 2.0%), and a 25-year retiree will receive 57.5% of the computation base [(20
years of service X 2.0%) + (5 years of service X 3.5%)]. A 30-year retiree, however, will
continue to receive 75% of the retired pay computation base [(20 years of service X 2.0%)
+ (10 years of service X 3.5%)]. The changed formula, therefore, is “skewed” much more
sharply in favor of the longer-serving military careerist, theoretically providing an incentive
to remain on active duty longer before retiring.
The Redux Formula: Retirees 62 and Older. Second, when a retiree reaches age
62, his or her retired pay will be recomputed based on the old formula, a straight 2.5% of the
retired pay computation base for each year of service. Thus, beginning at 62, the 20-year
retiree receiving 40% of the computation base for retired pay, according to the new formula,
will begin receiving 50% of his or her original computation base; the 25-year retiree’s
annuity will jump from 57.5% of the original computation base to 62.5%; and the 30-year
retiree’s annuity, already at 75% of the original computation base under both the old and new
formulas, will not change. (Note: this change is an increase in monthly retired pay, not a
lump sum at age 62.)
Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA), 1992-2001
(FY1993-FY2001)
The FY1993 National Defense Authorization Act (Sec. 4403, P.L. 102-484) granted
temporary authority (which expired on September 30, 2001) for the services to offer early
retirements to personnel with more than 15 but less than 20 years of service. TERA retired
pay was calculated in the usual ways except that there is an additional reduction of one
percent for every year of service below 20. Part or all of this latter reduction could be
restored if the retiree worked in specified public service jobs (such as law enforcement,
firefighting, and education) during the period immediately following retirement, until the
point at which the retiree would have reached the 20-year mark if he or she had remained in
the service.
Military Retired Pay and Social Security
Military personnel do not contribute a percentage of their salary to help pay for
retirement benefits. They have paid taxes into the social security trust fund since January 1,
1957, and are entitled to full social security benefits based on their military service. Military
retired pay and social security are not offset against each other; military retirees receive full
social security benefits in addition to their military retired pay.
CRS-4

---

IB85159
07-28-04
Retired Pay and Survivor Benefit COLAs
Military retired pay is protected against inflation by statute (10 USC 1401a). The
Military Retirement Reform Act of 1986, in conjunction with recent changes in the FY2000
National Defense Authorization Act, provides for cost of living adjustments (COLAs) as
indicated below. Congress has not modified the COLA formula since FY1996 (1995),
although virtually every year since 1982 some COLA modifications, always with the aim of
reducing costs and hence the payments to retirees, have been at least discussed. Therefore,
it is probably inadvisable to assume at any time that COLAs will be totally off the table in
future Congresses. For further information on COLAs, see CRS Report 98-223, COLAs for
Military Retirees: Summary of Congressional and Executive Branch Action, 1982-2002
(FY1983-FY2003).
What Was the Last COLA and What Will be the Next COLA?
The most recent military retirement COLA was 2.1%, first applied to the retired pay
disbursed on January 1, 2004. For a discussion of proposed and actual COLA changes over
the past 20 years, see CRS Report 98-223, COLAs for Military Retirees: Summary of
Congressional and Executive Branch Action, 1982-2003 (FY1983-FY2004).
COLAs for Pre-August 1, 1986 Entrants
For military personnel who first entered military service before August 1, 1986, each
December a cost-of-living-adjustment (COLA) equal to the percentage increase in the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) between the third quarters of successive years will be applied
to military retired pay for the annuities paid beginning each January 1. For example, assume
that the Consumer Price Index rises from 400.0 in September 2005 to 412.0 in September
2006, an increase of 12.0 points or 3.0% of 400.0. The monthly retired pay that accrues
during December 2006, and will actually be paid to retirees on January 1, 2007, would be
increased by 3.0% above that amount paid the previous month.
COLAs for Personnel Who Entered Service On or
After August 1, 1986
For those personnel who first entered military service on or after August 1, 1986, the
FY2000 National Defense Authorization Act provides that their COLAs will be calculated
in accordance with either of two methods, as noted below.
Non-Redux Recipients. Those personnel who opt to have their retired pay
computed in accordance with the pre-Redux formula will have their COLAs computed as
described above for pre-August 1, 1986 entrants.
Redux/$30,000 Cash Bonus Recipients. Those personnel who opt to have their
retired pay computed in accordance with the Redux formula, and receive the $30,000 cash
bonus, will have their COLAs computed as follows. Annual COLAs will be held to one
percentage point below the actual inflation rate for retirees under age 62. Retirees covered
by this new COLA formula would thus receive a 2.0% increase (rather than 3.0%) in their
military retired pay under the hypothetical example described in the above paragraph. When
CRS-5

---

IB85159
07-28-04
a retiree reaches age 62, there will be a one-time recomputation of his or her annuity to make
up for the lost purchasing power caused by the holding of COLAs to the inflation rate minus
one percentage point. This recomputation will be applied to the old, generally more liberal
retired pay computation formula on which retirees 62 or older will have their annuities
computed (see the above subsection entitled Retired Pay Computation Formula),
compounding, for most retirees, the size of this one-time annuity increase. After the
recomputation at 62, however, future COLAs will continue to be computed on the basis of
the inflation rate minus one percentage point.
Costs and Benefits of the Two Retirement Alternatives. An analysis of the
economic effects for hypothetical retirees indicates that in almost all cases opting for the pre-
Redux formula will pay the individual much more over time. A report of the Center for
Naval Analyses states that the more liberal retired pay computation formula and COLA
formula of pre-Redux far outweighs the short-term benefits of a $30,000 pre-tax cash bonus.
The report did say that it might be possible for an individual investor to “beat” these negative
aspects of the bonus by wise investment decisions but that it would be difficult.2 Naturally,
no study can know what an individual’s financial situation is. At first, only a fairly small
percentage of personnel opted for the $30,000 lump sum.3 However, the number appears to
have been rising. Since the bonus option first became available in 2001, 50% of eligible
Marine Corps enlisted retirees, 40% of warrant officers, but only 13% of commissioned
officers have taken it,4 suggesting the attractiveness of the immediate cash payment to the
lower-paid members of the career force.
Military Retirement Budgeting and Costs
Accounting for Military Retirement in the Federal Budget
All DOD budgets through FY1984 reflected the costs of retired pay actually being paid
out to personnel who had already retired. Congress simply appropriated the amount of
money required to pay current retirees each year. Since FY1985, the “accrual accounting”
concept has been used to budget for the costs of military retired pay. Under this system, the
DOD budget for each fiscal year reflects the estimated amount of money that must be set
aside and accrued at interest from investment in special, non-marketable U.S. government
securities similar in some ways to Treasury bills and bonds. This interest funds the retired
pay to which persons currently in the Armed Forces during that fiscal year, and who
ultimately retire, will be entitled in the future. These estimated future retirement costs are
arrived at by making projections based on the past rates at which active duty military
personnel stayed in the service until retirement, and on assumptions regarding the overall
U.S. economy, such as interest rates, inflation rates, and military pay levels. These DOD
2 Crawley, Vince. “Report: Taking Redux Bonus Is ‘Loan’ Against Retirement.” Marine Corps
Times, May 21, 2001: 10.
3 Crawley, Vince. “Which Pays Best...The Bonus or the Egg?” Army Times, Apr. 22, 2002: 14; “How
the Choices Compare.” Army Times, Apr. 22, 2002: 15.
4 Brinkley, C. Mark. “Skip `Redux’ bonus, former top enlisted Marine warns: Retired-pay cut not
worth it, sergeant major says.” Marine Corps Times, August 2, 2004: 25.
CRS-6

---

IB85159
07-28-04
budget outlays for retirement are computed as a percentage of a fiscal year’s total military
pay costs for each military service. Approximately 35-40% of military basic pay costs must
be added to the DOD personnel budget each fiscal year to cover the future retirement costs
of those personnel who ultimately retire from the military.
DOD budget outlays in each fiscal year that pay for the estimated cost of future retirees
are transferred in a paper transaction to a Military Retirement Fund, located in the Income
Security Function of the federal budget. The Military Retirement Fund also receives [paper]
transfers from the General Fund of the Treasury to fund the initial unfunded liability of the
military retirement system. This is the total future cost of military retired pay that will result
from military service performed prior to the implementation of accrual accounting in
FY1985. Money is disbursed from this Military Retirement Fund to current retirees.
Individual retirees continue to receive their retired pay from DOD finance centers.
Technically, however, because this money paid to individuals comes not from the DOD
budget, but from the Fund, it is paid out by the Income Security function of the federal
budget. Actual payments to current retirees thus show up in the federal budget as outlays
from the federal budget as a whole, but not from DOD. Under accrual accounting, therefore,
total federal outlays for each fiscal year continue to reflect only costs of payments to military
members who have already retired, as was the case before accrual accounting began. Accrual
accounting only changes the manner in which the federal government accounts for military
retired pay; it does not affect actual payments to individuals in any way.
Unfunded Liability
Current debates over both federal civilian and military retirement have included some
discussion of the “unfunded liability” of both. As noted above, the military retirement
system’s unfunded liability consists of future retired pay costs incurred before the creation
of the Military Retirement Fund in FY1985. These obligations are being liquidated by the
payment to the Fund each year of an amount from the General Fund of the Treasury and will
be fully paid, based on current calculations, by FY2033. The unfunded liability at the end
of FY2002 was $545.0 billion; the estimated liability for FY2003 was $560.0 billion; for
FY2004, $575.7 billion; and for FY2005, $591.7 billion.5
Some concerns have been voiced about the amount of unfunded liability. However,
(1) the hundreds of billions of dollars of unfunded liability is a cumulative amount to be paid
to retirees over the next 50 years, not all at once; (2) by the time some persons first become
eligible for retired pay under the pre-accrual accounting system, many others will have died;
and (3) unlike the private sector, there is no way for employees to claim immediate payment
of their future benefits. An analogy would be that most homeowners cannot afford to pay
cash for a house, so they get a mortgage. If the mortgage had to be paid in full, almost no
homeowners could afford to do so. However, spread out over 30 years, the payments are
affordable. Similarly, the unfunded liability of federal retirement programs is deemed
affordable when federal retirement outlays are spread over many decades.
5 Valuation of the Military Retirement System as of September 30, 2002. Department of Defense
Office of the Actuary: 24, Table 12: Past and Projected Unfunded Liability Balance on September
30 (Before Payment). Available online at [http://www.dod.mil/actuary/].
CRS-7

---

IB85159
07-28-04
Military Retirement Cost Trends
Because military retirement is an entitlement, rather than a discretionary program, its
costs to the total federal budget (payments to current retirees and survivors) always rise
modestly each year, due to a predictable slow rise in the number of retirees and survivors.
The cost to DOD (estimated future retirement costs of current personnel) declined after
FY1989 (the beginning of the post-Cold War drawdown), as the size of the force, and
therefore the number of people who will retire from it in the future, declined. However, as
the drawdown stabilized, so did the DOD budget costs of retirement. Table 2 indicates the
costs of military retired pay in federal budget outlays (payments to current retirees) and
Department of Defense accrual outlays (money set aside to fund future retirees).
Table 2. Military Retirement Outlays
(billions of current dollars)
Total Federal
Accrual Outlays from
Budget Outlays
DOD Budget
Estimated FY2005*
$38.3
$13.3
Estimated FY2004*
37.2
14.8
Actual FY2003*
35.6
13.7
Actual FY2002**
35.1
12.9
Actual FY2001**
34.1
11.4
*FY2005 Budget of the United States Government. Appendix: 927.
**FY2004 Budget of the United States Government. Appendix: 903.
Cost Concerns about Recent Retiree Benefit Increases
The cost of concurrent receipt of military retired pay and VA disability compensation
(discussed immediately below) is frequently cited in the context of other benefits to retired
military personnel and their families that have been created, or expanded, since the late
1990s. DOD and others have argued that such retiree benefits are becoming increasingly
costly and do not “leverage readiness” by applying directly to active duty or reserve military
personnel and their families. They suggest that the money being used for these purposes
should be channeled into active duty or reserve benefits that directly relate to recruitment or
career retention not retiree compensation, whose relationship to actual or potential personnel
shortages is tenuous and difficult to establish.
The two benefits most often included in this category are concurrent receipt and CRSC,
and TRICARE for life (extending, to Medicare-eligible military retirees, DOD health care
insurance for care obtained from civilian sources). Others would include in this list repeal
of the Redux cuts in military retirement (discussed above). In addition, concerns have been
voiced about retiree benefit increases that have not been enacted but that are under active
debate and consideration in Congress, including eliminating the reduction in Survivor
Benefit Plan annuities that takes place at age 62 (when Social Security eligibility is reached)
and lowering the age at which reserve retirees can first receive retired pay from 60 to 55.
The arguments in favor of these benefit increases have been equally strong. Proponents
suggest that even if they do not directly affect active duty or reserve military personnel, by
CRS-8

---

IB85159
07-28-04
strengthening the broad range of benefits available to military retirees, they provide a strong
career retention incentive. In particular, they argue that although most of the U.S. Army, and
a substantial part of the Marine Corps, is at war in Iraq and Afghanistan and repetitive tours
of duty in those two theaters of combat operations are a likely prospect for active duty
personnel and reserve personnel, now is the time to be buttressing the “pot of gold at the end
of the rainbow” — the benefits available to military personnel who are willing to undergo
the hardships of a military career in return for liberal retirement benefits after 20 years of
service.
Concurrent Receipt of Military Retired Pay and
VA Disability Compensation
Military Retired Pay and VA Disability Compensation: Overview
Most people familiar with military retirement would probably agree that the most
controversial military retirement issue that is currently the object of intense congressional
interest is that involving concurrent receipt of military retired pay and Department of
Veterans’ Affairs (VA) disability compensation. Until 2004, the law required that military
retired pay be reduced by the amount of any VA disability compensation received. For many
years some military retirees had sought a change in law to permit receipt of all or some of
both, and legislation to allow this has been introduced during the past several Congresses,
frequently having co-sponsors well above half of both the House and the Senate. This issue
is referred to as “concurrent receipt,” because it would involve the simultaneous receipt of
two types of benefits. In 1999, legislation was enacted to provide “special compensation”
to certain severely disabled military retirees who would be eligible for concurrent receipt if
concurrent receipt were ever enacted. This legislation was amended in 2000, 2001, and 2002
to increase the amount of benefits. Also, in 2002, further legislation, known as “combat-
related special compensation,” or CRSC, was enacted. It provides, for certain seriously
disabled retirees, a cash benefit financially identical to what concurrent receipt would
provide them. Neither type of “special compensation” removed the statutory prohibition on
actual concurrent receipt.
The FY2004 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) authorized, for the first time,
actual concurrent receipt as well as a greatly expanded CRSC program; this is discussed in
greater detail below. For a detailed description of the existing concurrent receipt and CRSC
programs, including a sample application form, see a website maintained by the Military
Officers Association of America (MOAA) at [http://www.moaa.org/Legislative/
Retirement/CR_CRSC_AddInfo.asp].
The George W. Bush Administration (and the Clinton Administration before it) has
been consistently opposed to concurrent receipt. However, although the Administration
threatened vetoes of concurrent receipt in 2002 and earlier in 2003, no such actions appeared
to have even been contemplated, let alone actually occurring, regarding the FY2004 NDAA
the President signed on November 24, 2003.
VA Disability Compensation. To qualify for VA disability compensation, a
determination must be made by the VA that the veteran sustained a particular injury or
CRS-9

---

IB85159
07-28-04
disease, or had a preexisting condition aggravated, while serving in the Armed Forces. Some
exceptions exist for certain conditions that may not have been apparent during military
service but which are presumed to have been service-connected. The VA has a scale of 10
ratings, from 10% to 100%, although there is no special arithmetic relationship between the
amount of money paid for each step. Each percentage rating entitles the veteran to a specific
level of disability compensation. In a major difference from the DOD disability retirement
system, a veteran receiving VA disability compensation can ask for a medical reexamination
at any time (or a veteran who does not receive disability compensation upon separation from
service can be reexamined later). All VA disability compensation is tax-free, which makes
receipt of VA compensation desirable, even with the operation of the offset.
Interaction of DOD and VA Disability Benefits. Military retirees can also apply
to the VA for disability compensation. This can be advantageous to retirees who have a
DOD disability rating because, although offset, the VA compensation is totally tax-free.
Also, a retiree may (1) apply for VA compensation any time after leaving the service and (2)
have his or her degree of disability changed by the VA as the result of a later medical
reevaluation, as noted above. Many retirees seek benefits from the VA years after retirement
for a condition that may have been incurred during military service but that does not manifest
itself until many years later. The DOD and VA disability rating systems have much in
common as well as significant differences. DOD makes a determination of eligibility for
disability retirement only once, at the time the individual is separating from the service.
Although DOD uses the VA schedule of types of disabilities to determine the percentage of
disability, DOD measures disability, or lack thereof, against the extent to which the
individual can or cannot perform military duties, rather than his or her ability to perform
post-service civilian work. A military retiree, regardless of his or her DOD disability status
immediately upon retirement, can apply for VA disability compensation at any time after
leaving active military duty. Military disability retired pay is usually taxable, unless related
to a combat disability. For further discussion of these and other relevant issues, see CRS
Report 95-469, Military Retirement and Veterans’ Compensation: Concurrent Receipt
Issues.
Repeal of “Special Compensation” For Severely Disabled Retirees
The FY2004 NDAA repealed certain specific monthly payments for severely disabled
military retirees which had been authorized by the FY2000, FY2001, and FY2002 National
Defense Authorization Acts. These benefits were, in effect, de facto concurrent receipt,
known in statute as “special compensation,” for those retirees with at least a 60% VA
disability, if the disability rating was received from the VA within four years of retiring from
military service. They were limited to retired personnel with at least 20 years of service.
“Combat Related Special Compensation” (CRSC):
Enacted in 2002 and Expanded in 2003
The FY2004 NDAA (Sec. 642) repealed the 60% minimum disability requirement for
CRSC contained in the FY2003 NDAA, enacted in 2002. Effective January 1, 2004, CRSC
is now available to any retiree who meets the other eligibility criteria (at least 20 years of
service; a Purple Heart; and/or injuries sustained while performing military duty in a combat
CRS-10

---

IB85159
07-28-04
situation, or with military equipment, or during military training, as described below in more
detail). In 2002, the FY2003 NDAA (Sec. 636, P.L. 107-314; 116 Stat. 2458) authorized
“Combat Related Special Compensation,” or CRSC for military retirees who have at least
20 years of service and who have either:
! A disability that is “attributable to an injury for which the member was
awarded the Purple Heart,” and is not rated as less than a 10% disability by
DOD or the VA; or
! At least a 60% disability rating from either DOD or the VA, incurred due to
involvement in “armed conflict,” “hazardous service,” “duty simulating
war,” and “through an instrumentality of war.” This appears, in lay terms,
to encompass combat with any kind of hostile force; hazardous duty such as
diving, parachuting, using dangerous materials such as explosives, and the
like; individual training and unit training and exercises and maneuvers in the
field; and “instrumentalities of war” such as accidents in combat vehicles
or, if due to training-related activities, aboard naval vessels or military
aircraft, and accidental injuries due to occurrences such as munitions
explosions, injuries from gases or vapors related to training for combat, and
the like.
Note that these criteria remain identical in 2004; the only change is the repeal of the 60%
rating limit.
CRSC payments will be equal to the amount of VA disability compensation to which
the retiree is entitled, but the new legislation does not end the requirement that the retiree’s
military retired pay be reduced by whatever VA compensation to which the retiree is entitled.
Therefore, CRSC beneficiaries will receive the financial equivalence of concurrent receipt,
but in legal and statutory terms it will not constitute concurrent receipt, and the statute also
states that it explicitly is not retired pay per se. For online applications and information, see
[https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/crsc] or [http://www.dior.whs.mil/forms/DD2860.PDF]. Retirees
may also phone the retirement services offices of their service for the necessary information.
CRSC for Reserve Retirees. The revised CRSC statute in the FY2004 NDAA
clearly states that personnel who qualify for reserve retirement by having at least 20 years of
duty creditable for reserve retirement purposes are eligible for CRSC. When CRSC was
enacted in 2002, DOD interpreted the law as requiring reserve retirees to have at least 7,200
reserve retirement “points” to be eligible for CRSC. A reservist receives a certain number
of retirement points for varying levels of participation in the reserves, or active duty military
service. The 7,200 point figure was extraordinarily high — in fact, it could only have been
attained by a reservist who had at least 20 years of active duty military service. Hence, the
original law effectively denied CRSC to reservists.
Concurrent Receipt for Retirees with 50% or Greater Disability
In addition to greatly expanding CRSC, the FY2004 NDAA (Sec. 641) authorizes, for
the first time, actual concurrent receipt for retirees with at least a 50% disability, regardless
of the cause of disability. However, the amount of concurrent receipt will be phased in over
a 10-year period, from 2004 to 2013. Depending on the degree of disability, the initial
CRS-11

---

IB85159
07-28-04
amount of retired pay that the retiree could receive would vary from $100 to $750 per month,
or the actual amount, whichever is less. By 2014, the decrease in retired pay would be totally
eliminated. As with the revised CRSC, this concurrent receipt benefit is also available to
those reservists with at least 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement purposes.
The actual operation of the new concurrent receipt benefit is complicated, due to its
progressive implementation over several years as required by law [10 USC 1414 (c), as
enacted by Subsection 641(a), P.L. 108-136, November 24, 2003; 117 Stat. 1511]. It uses
both dollar amounts and percentage amounts and varies in accordance with the degree of
disability and by calendar year (not fiscal year) as follows:
2004. In calendar year 2004, military retirees entitled to VA disability compensation
will be entitled to receive, in addition to that part of their military retired pay which is greater
than the total VA compensation to which they are entitled, the following additional amounts
of retired pay:
100% disability:
Up to $750 per month additional retired pay
90% disability:
Up to $500 per month additional retired pay
80% disability:
Up to $350 per month additional retired pay
70% disability:
Up to $250 per month additional retired pay
60% disability:
Up to $125 per month additional retired pay
50% disability:
Up to $100 per month additional retired pay
Example. Assume a retiree with 100% disability (i.e., up to $750 per month as
described above) is entitled to $1,500 per month in military retired pay and $1,000 per
month in VA disability compensation. Until now, due to the ban on concurrent receipt,
the retiree would receive only $500 per month in military retired pay, because the
remaining $1,000 per month of retired pay was offset by the retiree’s $1,000 in VA
compensation. However, in 2004, this hypothetical retiree’s military retired pay would
increase to $1,250 per month (the $500 unaffected by the VA compensation and an
additional $750 per month, for a total of $1,250). However, $250 of the $1,000 in
monthly VA compensation would still be offset.
2005. In calendar year 2005, military retirees entitled to VA disability compensation
will be entitled to any such amounts received in 2004 and an additional 10% of the offset
that was remaining in 2004. For example, using the hypothetical 100% disability case shown
above, the retiree would receive the same amount of retired pay as in 2004 plus 10% of the
$250 in VA compensation that had not yet been offset, or an additional $25. Thus, the retiree
in this example would be receiving the $1,250 monthly received in 2004 plus an additional
$25, or $1,275 — leaving $225 of the VA compensation still being deducted from the
retiree’s DOD retired pay.
2006. In calendar year 2006, the same procedure as in 2005 would apply, but the
retirees affected would get an additional 20% of their remaining offset from 2004. Thus, the
retiree in this example would be receiving the $1,250 monthly received in 2004 plus an
CRS-12

---

IB85159
07-28-04
additional $50, or $1,300 — leaving $200 of the VA compensation still being deducted from
the retiree’s DOD retired pay.
2007-2014.
2007— An additional 30%
2008— An additional 40%
2009— An additional 50%
2010— An additional 60%
2011— An additional 70%
2012— An additional 80%
2013— An additional 90%
2014— All offsets would end; military retirees with at least a 50% disability
would be allowed to receive their entire military retired pay and VA
disability compensation.
For those retirees who retire after 2004, their initial amounts will be the dollar amount
prescribed for each percentage of disability (the range listed above between $100 and $750,
depending on degree of disability), plus the additional percentage of that dollar amount for
that year. Thus, a retiree who first retires in, say, 2006, with an 80% disability will begin
receiving an additional $420 monthly of his or her retired pay (the $350 that an 80% disabled
retiree is entitled to, as noted above, plus the additional 20% of $350, or $70, specified for
2006).
Because of the high initial amounts provided to severely disabled retirees, this new
concurrent receipt benefit is “front-loaded”; that is, most retirees will be able to concurrently
receive most of their military retired pay within a few years of enactment of the law.
A retiree cannot receive both CRSC and concurrent-receipt benefits. The retiree may
choose whichever is most financially advantageous to him or her and may move back and
forth between either benefit to maximize the payments received as often as desired.
Concurrent Receipt and CRSC:
Eligibility of Military Disability Retirees
The question is frequently asked if military disability retirees can concurrently receive
VA disability compensation, or receive CRSC, under the new law. The Military Officers
Association of America (MOAA) website at [http://www.moaa.org/Legislative/Retirement/
CRQA.asp] describes such entitlement:
....[disability] retirees who are also eligible for longevity retirement (20 years of service
or more for retirement purposes) will be eligible. However, their CRSC or concurrent
receipt entitlement will be calculated as if they had received a non-disability retirement.
They will not be reimbursed to the level of their service-awarded disability retirement [if
that was greater than the non-disability calculation].
CRS-13

---

IB85159
07-28-04
Congressional Action on Concurrent Receipt in 2004 (FY2005)
On May 18, 2004, Senator Harry Reid, who has been in the forefront of attempts to
enact concurrent receipt, introduced an amendment to the FY2005 NDAA (S. 2400) to
repeal the requirement, contained in the FY2004 NDAA, that concurrent receipt be limited
to those retirees with a 50% disability or greater. It was not approved by the full Senate. On
June 18, another amendment of Senator Reid’s to allow immediate (rather than a 10-year
phase in period) concurrent receipt for military retirees with a 100% service-connected
disability passed the Senate by voice vote.
The Senate passed its version of the FY2005 NDAA on June 23. The House version of
the FY2005 NDAA (H.R. 4200) contains no concurrent receipt provisions. Conference
action will almost certainly not take place until the Congress returns from its August 2004
recess.
Costs and Numbers of Beneficiaries of Concurrent Receipt/CRSC
FY2004 NDAA Provisions. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated
that the costs of payments to individual retirees — hence, the costs to the total federal budget
— for the concurrent-receipt related provisions in the FY2004 NDAA will be about $700
million in FY2005; $4.5 billion during FY2005-FY2009; and $16.3 billion during FY2005-
FY2014. The costs to the DOD budget for paying accrual costs to the Military Retirement
Fund are estimated to be $1.4 billion in FY2005; $7.3 billion in the five-year period FY2005-
FY2009; and $15.7 billion during the ten years FY2005-FY2014. For further discussion of
the differentiation of these two completely different figures (and figures that should not be
added together to comprise “total” costs), see the section above entitled Military Retirement
Budgeting and Costs, especially the subsection on Accounting for Military Retirement in the
Federal Budget.
Estimates of the numbers of eligible beneficiaries of the concurrent receipt-related
provisions in the FY2004 NDAA vary considerably. The Army Times, an unofficial, but
often regarded as authoritative, newspaper serving the military community, in 2003 reported
that “it appears that of the estimated 645,000 military retirees who have their retired pay
reduced [by the amount of VA compensation they now receive], about 295,000 would get
full retired and disability checks within five years under the plan. Only about 85,000 of the
460,000 military retirees with disabilities rated at 40 percent or less are expected to qualify
for full concurrent receipt because their disabilities are combat- or training-related.” 6 Other
Army Times articles have quoted governmental and nongovernmental sources as estimating
that up to 500,000 retirees could be eligible for the liberalized CRSC.7 A rough indication
of the numbers and costs involved can be obtained by the numbers of beneficiaries and costs
incurred during the first full month of CRSC payments. As noted above, about 147,000
6 Neils C. Sorrells. Veterans Call ‘Concurrent Receipt’ Deal a Good First Step, Vow Further
Action.” Congressional Quarterly Weekly, October 18, 2003: 2579; Rick Maze, “Lawmaker:
Framework Set for Concurrent Receipt Deal.” Army Times, October 20, 2003: 40.
7 Tice, Jim. “Many Retired Soldiers Eligible for Special Pay.” Army Times, February 9, 2004: 28.
Two weeks earlier, the figure of 200,000 was quoted in Army Times. Crawley, Vince. “Retirees
may face long waits to receive additional money.” January 26, 2004: 26.
CRS-14

---

IB85159
07-28-04
retirees have already begun receiving CRSC; their payments for March 2004 cost about $55
million, or an average of $374 monthly for each retiree.8
Costs and Numbers of Beneficiaries for Full Concurrent Receipt if
Enacted. According to CBO, full concurrent receipt, if it had been enacted in time for
FY2004 to begin, would have cost approximately $3 billion in FY2004, rising to $5 billion
by FY2013, and totaling $41 billion over the ten-year period FY2004-FY2013. Almost
700,000 retirees would have been eligible for full concurrent receipt in FY2004. (At the
other extreme, some of the very restrictive concurrent receipt options considered, such as
limiting it to 100% combat-disabled retirees, would apply to only a few thousand retirees and
would have annual costs of a few tens of millions of dollars.)
Pros and Cons of Concurrent Receipt
These are only the most frequently cited positions on the issue. See CRS Report 95-
469, Military Retirement and Veterans’ Compensation: Concurrent Receipt Issues, for more
arguments pro and con on concurrent receipt.
The most frequently cited arguments for and against concurrent receipt involve equity
and cost. Perhaps the central argument in favor of concurrent receipt is that military
nondisability retired pay was earned for length of service; VA disability compensation, for
disability. They therefore accrue for two different things and arguably do not constitute a
duplication of benefits. This argument is countered by statements that military retired pay
and VA compensation, even if provided for different reasons, accrue for service that takes
place at the same time, and that as a general principle, people should not be allowed to
receive two benefits for the same period of service. Another approach to the problem
involving equity compares these two benefits with others provided by the federal
government. If VA disability compensation beneficiaries are entitled to other federal benefits
— and private sector pensions — without having their VA benefits reduced; why should
military retired pay be singled out as requiring an offset?
The cost issue is central to most debate about concurrent receipt. As noted above, the
cost of full, or nearly full, concurrent receipt would be considerable — some estimates say
almost $5 billion yearly if implemented in FY2004. Furthermore, it is asserted, eliminating
or reducing this offset would “be sticking the camel’s nose into the tent,” setting a precedent
for the reduction or elimination of all kinds of similar offsets of one or more federal
payments, possibly costing billions of dollars. In addition, concurrent receipt was never
promised to those asking for it.
Veterans Disability Benefits Commission
Title XV of the FY2004 NDAA (Sections 1501-1507) established a Veterans Disability
Benefits Commission to “carry out a study of the benefits provided under the laws of the
United States that are provided to compensate and assist veterans and their survivors for
disabilities and deaths attributable to military service.” [Subsection 1502(a).] The motivation
for this study appears to have been the attention that the concurrent receipt issue has drawn
8 Crawley, “DFAS Paying Concurrent Retired, Disabled Benefits for Combat-injured.”
CRS-15

---

IB85159
07-28-04
to the current range of benefits for disabled veterans and their survivors. The existing
panoply of such benefits has grown piecemeal over the past two centuries, leading to
complicated interaction among the different types of payments, of which concurrent receipt
is only one such example.
The Commission will have 13 members, of which two will be appointed by the Speaker
of the House and two by the House minority leader, and two by the Senate majority and two
by the Senate minority leader. The five remaining members will be appointed by the
President. One of the two members in each of the four congressional categories, and three
of the five presidential appointees, must be veterans who have received any of the following
military decorations: Medal of Honor; Distinguished Service Cross (the Army’s “Cross”
decoration), Navy Cross (also awarded to members of the Marine Corps and Coast Guard),
and Air Force Cross; or the Silver Star. The Commission is required to hold its first meeting
within 30 days after a majority of its 13 members has been appointed and must present its
report to the President no later than 15 months after its first meeting. The Commission’s
report will include recommendations “for revising the benefits provided by the United States
to veterans and their survivors for disability and death attributable to military service.”
[Subsection 1503(2).]
CRS-16

---