Order Code IB89118
CRS Issue Brief for Congress
Received through the CRS Web
Lebanon
Updated July 11, 2003
Clyde R. Mark
Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division
Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

---

CONTENTS
SUMMARY
MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
United States and Lebanon
U.S.-Lebanon Issues
Peace Process
Lebanon-Israel Border Clashes
The Travel Ban
U.S. Interests
U.S. Policy Toward Lebanon
U.S. Assistance for Lebanon
Role of Congress
Other Events in U.S.-Lebanon Relations
Lebanon’s Political Profile
Civil War, 1975-1990
The “Taif” Reforms, 1989
Political Dynamics
Lebanon’s Population
1992, 1996, and 2000 Elections
Foreign Presence in Lebanon
Syria
Israel
CHRONOLOGY

---

IB89118
07-11-03
Lebanon
SUMMARY
The United States and Lebanon continue
Lebanon in 1982 and occupied a 10-mile-wide
to enjoy good relations. At issue between the
strip along the Israel-Lebanon border until
United States and Lebanon are progress
May 23, 2000.
toward a Lebanon-Israel peace treaty and U.S.
aid to Lebanon. The United States supports
Lebanon’s government is based in part
Lebanon’s independence and favored the end
on a 1943 agreement that called for a
of Israeli and Syrian occupation of parts of
Maronite Christian President, a Sunni Muslim
Lebanon. Israel withdrew from southern
Prime Minister, and a Shia Muslim Speaker of
Lebanon on May 23, 2000. An estimated
the National Assembly, and stipulated that the
6,000 Syrian troops withdrew from the Beirut
National Assembly seats and civil service jobs
area in July 2001, leaving about 20,000 Syri-
be distributed according to a ratio of 6
ans in Lebanon.
Christians to 5 Muslims. On August 21, 1990,
the Lebanon National Assembly adopted the
From 1987 until July 1997, the United
“Taif” reforms (called “Taif” after the Saudi
States banned travel to Lebanon because of
Arabian city where they were negotiated).
the threat of kidnapping and dangers from the
The parliament was increased to 128 to be
ongoing civil war.
divided evenly between Christians and Mus-
lim-Druze, presidential authority was
Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan said
decreased, and the Speaker’s and the Prime
the United States had “vital” interests in
Minister’s authority was increased. President
Lebanon, but others might describe U.S.
Ilyas Hirawi signed the constitutional amend-
interests in Lebanon as less than vital. A large
ment implementing the reforms on September
Lebanese-American community follows
21, 1990.
U.S.-Lebanon relations closely. The United
States also watches events in Lebanon because
Lebanon held elections for the National
Lebanon is a party to the Arab- Israel dispute.
Assembly in 1992 and again in 1996. In the
1996 election, the extreme left and the ex-
Lebanon is rebuilding after the
treme right lost to moderates, but the moderate
1975-1990 civil war. According to estimates,
victory also was a victory for Syria, which
more than 100,000 people died, another
supported moderate, and not extremist, candi-
200,000 were wounded, 250,000 emigrated to
dates. Speaker Birri and Prime Minister Hariri
avoid the fighting, and as many as one-third of
each controlled blocs of about 20 seats. The
the 3 million population were refugees in the
National Assembly elected Emile Lahud
Lebanon civil war. Syrian armed forces,
President on October 15, 1998.
invited into Lebanon in 1976 to prevent a
Muslim attack on the Christians, continue to
Other CRS reports on Lebanon include
occupy the northern and eastern parts of the
CRS Issue Brief IB92075, Syria: U.S. Rela-
country. Israeli forces invaded southern
tions and Bilateral Issues.
Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

---

IB89118
07-11-03
MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Lebanon radio reported on July 10, 2003, that Chamber of Deputies Speaker Nabih Birri
had a heated exchange with U.S. Ambassador Vincent Battle over the U.S. mediating role
in the Lebanon-Israel dispute over the al-Wazzani River water. Lebanon is pumping water
out of the al-Wazzani, which Israel claims reduces the water in the Hasbani and Jordan
Rivers.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
United States and Lebanon
U.S.-Lebanon Issues
The United States has encouraged the reconciliation and rebuilding of Lebanon
following the 1990 end of the 15-year civil war. There are several other issues between the
United States and Lebanon, in addition to rebuilding.
Peace Process. The United States favors a Lebanon-Israel peace treaty. Both
Lebanon and Israel agreed to a peace settlement in May 1983, under the tutelage of U.S.
Secretary of State George Shultz, but Lebanon later abrogated the agreement under Syrian
pressure. Lebanon participated in the Madrid peace conference in October 1991, but it was
widely understood that Lebanon and Israel would not sign a peace agreement unless and until
Syria and Israel had resolved their differences. The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported on
January 10, 1997, that Israel and Lebanon had agreed to a framework for a peace treaty in
1994, but the agreement was linked to a Syrian-Israeli resolution of the Golan Heights issue.
Israel and Lebanon accept their common boundary drawn by the French and British in
1922-1923. The primary issue separating Israel and Lebanon had been the 1982 Israeli
occupation of southern Lebanon, but Israel withdrew in May 2000. A Lebanon-Israel peace
agreement will follow an Israeli-Syrian agreement.
Lebanon-Israel Border Clashes. The Lebanon-Israel border has been the scene
of frequent incidents between the Israeli Defense Forces and the Israeli supported South
Lebanon Army on one side and various Lebanese and Palestinian militias on the other side.
In the past, the clashes usually involved Lebanese or Palestinian rockets launched at Israeli
towns, shooting incidents that targeted Israeli military installations or patrols, mines set along
roadsides that were triggered as Israeli vehicles passed, and infiltration attempts. The Israelis
launched artillery, aerial, or naval bombardments and armored incursions at suspected
guerrilla strongholds. Often, civilians on both sides were the targets of the attacks.
The most recent Israeli-Lebanese exchanges have involved Hizballah rocket attacks
on Israeli posts near Shib’a farms and Israeli air and artillery attacks on Hizballah sites and
Lebanese villages. Israel claims the Shib’a farms area is Syrian territory, and the Lebanese
claim the area belongs to Lebanon and that Israel should withdraw. (See CRS Report
RL31078, The Shib’a Farms Dispute and its Implications.)
CRS-1

---

IB89118
07-11-03
The Travel Ban. On July 1, 1985, following the hijacking of TWA flight 847 one
month earlier, President Ronald Reagan issued Executive Determination 85-14 prohibiting
U.S. airlines from flying to Lebanon, prohibiting airlines from ticketing passengers to
Lebanon, and prohibiting Lebanese aircraft from landing in the United States. On January
28, 1987, following the kidnapping of three U.S. citizens and one U.S. resident alien,
Secretary of State George Shultz banned U.S. citizens from traveling to Lebanon. On 25
October 1995, the United States reversed one of the 1985 prohibitions, and allowed U.S.
citizens with waivers to purchase airline tickets to Lebanon. Upon application, the
Department of State waived the ban and allowed U.S. citizens to travel to Lebanon if the
applicants were journalists, Red Cross workers, visiting critically ill family members, or were
pursuing U.S. national interests.
The Department of State maintained for 10 years that the ban was necessary to protect
U.S. travelers. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee held hearings on the travel ban in
January and August 1996, and the House International Relations Committee held a hearing
in June 1997. Opponents of the ban maintained that the civil war had ended, Lebanon was
safe for U.S. citizens, and that the ban should by dropped or, at a minimum, changed to a
travel advisory. The opponents said that the Lebanese civil war was over, that the militias
had been disarmed, that Lebanon had held two parliamentary elections (1992 and 1996), and
that the reconstruction of Lebanon was well underway. U.S. business interests, in particular,
suffered because they were not able to compete with European and Asian companies bidding
for lucrative reconstruction contracts, said the ban’s opponents.
On July 30, 1997, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright announced that the travel ban
would not be extended for another six months. U.S. citizens using U.S. passports were free
to travel to Lebanon. On June 19, 1998, President Clinton lifted the airline ticket ban,
allowing persons in the United States to purchase airline tickets to Beirut. The bans on U.S.
Airliners flying to Beirut and on Lebanese airliners flying to the United States remains in
force.
U.S. Interests
On July 15, 1958, President Eisenhower told Congress that he had deployed U.S. Armed
Forces to assist the Lebanese army in maintaining order in the face of a possible internal
rebellion because Lebanon had “...been deemed vital to United States national interests and
world peace.” (Public Papers of the Presidents, 1958, p. 550-551) On October 24, 1983, the
day after 241 U.S. Armed Forces personnel were killed in Beirut, President Reagan said
“...We have vital interests in Lebanon... .” (Public Papers of the Presidents, 1983, vol. II, p.
1501) Some would agree with the two Presidents that a friendly and independent Lebanon
is “vital” to U.S. interests. But others might disagree and suggest that the Eisenhower and
Reagan comments reflected the crisis atmospheres in which they acted and that U.S.-
Lebanon ties are more cultural than strategic.
The U.S. interests to which the two Presidents referred do not include conditions often
associated with “vital” interests; the tangible ties of military bases, oil fields, international
waterways, industrial strength, major trading partners, or allied military might. Rather, U.S.
interests in Lebanon stem from the ties of the Lebanese-American community (a majority of
Arab-Americans are of Lebanese origin), Lebanon’s pro- Western (and during the “cold war”
anti-communist) orientation, U.S.-Lebanon trade and cultural ties dating back to the early
CRS-2

---

IB89118
07-11-03
19th century, Lebanon’s requests for U.S. assistance against stronger regional neighbors,
Lebanon’s democratic and Christian experience, and Lebanon’s role as a reliable counselor
among the Arab nations.
On September 25, 1996, Elizabeth McKune, Director of the Office of Jordan, Lebanon,
Syria, and Palestinian Affairs at the Department of State, told the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee that “A stable, independent, economically vibrant and democratically governed
Lebanon is in the U.S. national interest. U.S. policy toward Lebanon remains firmly
committed to Lebanon’s unity, sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity, and we
encourage Lebanon’s continued adherence to democratic principles.”
U.S. Policy Toward Lebanon
The United States has enjoyed good diplomatic relations with Lebanon and has
supported Lebanon’s political independence. In July 1958, the United States sent 14,300
U.S. Army and Marine personnel to Lebanon to support the government in resisting a radical
seizure of the country. During the civil war period beginning in 1975, the United States
expressed its concern over the fighting, violence, and destruction of the country, and
provided emergency economic aid for the Lebanese people and military training and
equipment for the Lebanese Armed Forces. The United States supported the various efforts
to arrange cease-fires to end the civil war. U.S. Ambassador Philip Habib’s peace mission
following the 1982 Israeli invasion ended the fighting and led to the Israeli withdrawal. As
a part of the withdrawal agreement, the United States sent 2,000 Marines to join the French,
Italian, and British contingents in the MultiNational Force (MNF). Secretary of State George
Shultz negotiated a peace agreement between Lebanon and Israel in May 1983 (abrogated
by Lebanon in March 1984 under Syrian pressure).
In October 1989, the United States supported the Arab League-sponsored Taif meeting
(see The “Taif” Reforms, 1989, below) and supported the governmental reforms, disarming
the militias, and the withdrawal of foreign forces incorporated in the Taif agreement. The
United States encouraged Lebanon’s participation in the 1991 Madrid peace conference and
in the subsequent negotiations (although Lebanon acceded to Syrian pressure and has not
participated in the continuing multilateral and bilateral talks). The United States is a member
of the five nation force monitoring compliance with the April 26, 1996 Israeli-Hizballah
agreement to avoid civilians and limit the Israeli-Hizballah confrontation to military targets.
The agreement was negotiated by the United States.
U.S. Assistance for Lebanon. The Administration requested $32 million in
economic assistance, $700,000 in International Military Education and Training, and
$500,000 in child development assistance for Lebanon for FY2003, and the same amounts
for FY2004. (See Table 2, below.)
Role of Congress
On July 1, 1993, the U.S. Senate passed by voice vote S.Con.Res. 28, which stated that
Syria had violated the Taif Agreements by not withdrawing from Lebanon in September
1992, urged an immediate Syrian withdrawal, and called upon the President to continue
withholding aid and support for Syria.
CRS-3

---

IB89118
07-11-03
The House of Representatives added an amendment to the State Department
Authorization bill, Section 863 of H.R. 1646, in mid-May 2001, which would have cut
$600,000 in International Military Education and Training (IMET) funds to Lebanon unless
Lebanon deployed its armed forces to the border with Israel. Section 863 also called upon
the President to present a plan to Congress to cut ESF funds if Lebanon did not deploy within
six months.
Other Events in U.S.-Lebanon Relations
On April 18, 1983, a truck bomb destroyed the U.S. Embassy in west Beirut, killing 63
people, 17 of whom were U.S. citizens, and wounding another 100 people, 40 of whom were
U.S. citizens. On October 23, 1983, a truck bomb killed 220 U.S. Marine, 18 U.S. Navy, and
3 U.S. Army personnel in a Beirut airport building used as U.S. MNF headquarters and
barracks. On December 12, 1983, a truck bomb exploded in the U.S. embassy compound
in Kuwait, killing 6 people, none of them U.S. citizens. The incident appeared to be related
to the U.S. presence in Lebanon. In February 1984, the MNF, including the U.S. contingent,
left Beirut because it became obvious that Lebanon’s government was not able to extend its
control over Lebanese affairs. During the 16-month tour, 265 members of the U.S. MNF
contingent were killed. The United States lost prestige in the Middle East because many
Arabs believed the United States abandoned its commitment to Lebanon by withdrawing the
MNF before the Lebanese government was ready to assert its authority over the country. On
September 20, 1984, a truck bomb killed 20 people, 2 of whom were U.S. military personnel,
at the U.S. Embassy annex in Awkar, north-east of Beirut.
In addition, between 1982 and 1988, 18 U.S. citizens were kidnapped and held hostage,
most of them by pro-Iranian Lebanese. Fifteen of the U.S. hostages escaped or were
released, and 3, Peter Kilburn, William Higgins, and William Buckley, were killed while in
captivity.
On July 23, 1992, Secretary of State James Baker traveled from Syria to Zahle,
Lebanon, to meet with President Hirawi, Prime Minister Sulh, and Foreign Minister Buways.
The leaders discussed the resumption of the Lebanon/Israel peace negotiations, but Baker’s
trip to Lebanon assumed symbolic significance beyond the immediate peace talks. The
United States was demonstrating its commitment to Lebanon’s integrity, to Lebanon’s
elections, to Lebanon’s importance in the Middle East, and to Lebanon’s leaders and their
continuing reform of the system and emergence from 15 years of civil war. Secretary of
State Warren Christopher’s helicopter trip from Cyprus to Beirut on February 22, 1993,
during his fact-finding mission for the Arab-Israeli peace process, was similar to Secretary
Baker’s trip of July 1992, demonstrating U.S. ties to Lebanon, U.S. support for the Lebanese
government, and U.S. recognition of Lebanon’s independent role in the peace process.
Secretary Christopher visited Lebanon again on August 4, 1993, and Secretary Albright
visited Lebanon on September 15, 1997, and September 6, 1999.
CRS-4

---

IB89118
07-11-03
Lebanon’s Political Profile
The “National Covenant,” an unwritten agreement negotiated among Lebanese political
leaders in 1943, provided for the President to be a Maronite Christian, the Prime Minister to
be a Sunni Muslim, and the speaker of the Chamber of Deputies (renamed the National
Assembly in 1979) to be a Shia Muslim. The National Covenant also provided that
parliament seats and civil service jobs be distributed on the basis of 6 Christians to 5
Muslims (including Druze, a separate religious group often associated with Islam). The
President usually selects cabinet ministers to reflect the balance among Lebanon’s religious
communities distributing the portfolios among the Maronites, Greek Orthodox, Greek
Catholics, Armenian Orthodox, Armenian Catholic, Sunni, Shia, and Druze. The
Christian-to-Muslim job ratio and the confessional assignment of government positions was
based on the population as determined in the 1932 census.
According to the 1926 constitution, the people elect the parliament, the parliament
elects a President, and the President selects a Prime Minister and between 18 and 25
members of the cabinet, which then must receive a vote of confidence from the parliament.
The President, serving a 6-year, non-renewable term, does not have to win votes of
confidence. The President may propose laws, is responsible for implementing laws, but may
delay implementing laws passed by parliament by demanding additional debate, adjourning
parliament, or calling for new elections.
National Assembly deputies are elected for 4-year terms representing electoral districts.
The total number and religious affiliations of deputies from each district are determined by
the population of the district. All voters vote for all candidates regardless of the voter’s or
the candidate’s religion. The National Assembly elected in 1972 was composed of 53
Christians, 45 Muslim and Druze, and 1 to represent other minorities. The civil war that
began in 1975 delayed the 1976 election until August/September 1992.
Civil War, 1975-1990
A 1975 Christian attack on a Palestinian refugee community triggered the 15-year civil
war. At stake in the civil war was control over the political process and the opportunity to
dictate the permanent form of Lebanon’s government. The Lebanese government requested
Syrian forces in 1976 to protect the rightist/Christian enclave from being overrun by
leftist/Muslim forces. Later, the Arab League approved the Syrian intervention, and armed
forces from Sudan, Libya, and Saudi Arabia joined the Syrians in the Arab League’s “Arab
Deterrent Force.” Only the Syrian force remains in Lebanon. The fighting involved several
political party militias, the Lebanese Armed Forces (the government army), and many of the
Palestinian guerrilla groups. Lebanese militias tied to political parties or to ethnic-religious
factions fought among themselves for dominance over their wing of the political spectrum,
and then led their amalgamated force against the other political forces within Lebanon. For
example, the militia of the Maronite Christian Phalange party dominated by the Jumayyil
family, defeated its Maronite and conservative rival the National Liberal party led by the
Shamun family in 1980. The two armies then merged into the Lebanese Forces. Or in
another example, the leftist Shia Muslim Hizballah defeated another leftist Shia Muslim
group, the Amal party, in early 1989. Later, Hizballah and Amal formed a political alliance
to run in the 1992 elections.
CRS-5

---

IB89118
07-11-03
From 1975 to 1992, the civil war killed approximately 100,000, wounded 200,000, left
another 100,000 permanently disabled, and forced 250,000 into exile. (There are no accurate
data, no breakdown by year, community, sex, etc., for the casualties.) It is estimated that as
many as one-third of Lebanon’s 3 million people have been war refugees at one time or
another. Damage to Beirut and other cities is estimated in the billions of dollars.
The “Taif” Reforms, 1989
On August 18, 1988, the Lebanese National Assembly did not muster the 51-member
quorum needed to elect a successor to President Amin Jumayyil, whose 6-year term expired
on September 23, 1988. On most occasions in the past, political leaders and National
Assembly deputies agreed beforehand on the candidate for President, making the actual
National Assembly election little more than a ceremony formalizing what had been decided
in the inner circles of Lebanese politics. But, in 1988, the various political leaders could not
agree on a candidate for president and many of the Christian deputies boycotted the
Assembly session. A few moments before his term expired on September 23, 1988, outgoing
President Jumayyil appointed Army Commander-in-Chief General Michel Awn to be the
prime minister. General Awn named five other army officers to serve with him in the
cabinet, a Greek Orthodox, a Greek Catholic, a Druze, a Sunni Muslim, and a Shia Muslim.
The Muslim and Druze officers refused to serve in the Awn cabinet because Awn was a
Christian (a transgression of the National Covenant that called for a Sunni Prime Minister)
and because the existing cabinet, under Sunni Muslim Prime Minister Salim al-Huss, had not
resigned. Al-Huss appointed General Sami al-Khatib to be the interim Lebanon Armed
Forces (LAF) Commander-in-Chief.
On October 18, 1988, the National Assembly failed to elect a new Speaker who would
preside over the Assembly session that would elect a new president, providing the politicians
had agreed upon a candidate. Lebanon had no President, two Prime Ministers and two
cabinets, two army Commanders-in-Chief and a divided army, a National Assembly 13 years
overdue for elections, two interim speakers but no permanent speaker of the National
Assembly, and no immediate prospect of reconvening the parliament for an attempt to
resolve the situation. The government was in a stalemate.
In September 1989, after 9 months of consultations, an Arab League committee secured
a cease-fire and an agreement for a National Assembly meeting to be held in Taif, Saudi
Arabia, to discuss governmental reforms. On September 30, 1989, 62 members of the
Lebanese parliament met in Taif to begin discussions of government reforms. On October
22, 1989, the Deputies agreed to a reform plan that raised the number of seats in the National
Assembly from 99 up to 108, evenly divided between Christians and Muslim/Druze, left
appointment of the Prime Minister to the parliament, called for disbanding and disarming the
militias, and included a statement that Syria would begin troop withdrawal discussions
within 2 years. The National Assembly Deputies elected a new Speaker, Husayn al-Husayni,
and President, Rene Muawwad, and approved the reform package on November 5, 1989, at
a meeting in al-Qulayat in north Lebanon. On November 20, 1989, President Muawwad
appointed Salim al-Huss to be Prime Minister, and named a 14-member cabinet. On
November 22, 1989, President Muawwad was assassinated by a car bomb as he left Lebanese
Independence Day ceremonies in West Beirut. On November 24, the Deputies met in
Shtawra to elect Ilyas al-Hirawi as the new President. Al-Hirawi named Salim al-Huss to be
CRS-6

---

IB89118
07-11-03
the Prime Minister and General Emile Lahud to be Army Commander-in-Chief. Awn,
besieged at the Presidential palace, refused to recognize the new President.
On August 21, 1990, 48 of 51 National Assembly deputies meeting in Beirut approved
changing the National Assembly to 108 members, evenly divided between Christians and
Muslim-Druze, agreed to decrease the authority of the President by giving executive
authority to implement decisions to the Council of Ministers, and agreed to increase the
authority of the Speaker and the Prime Minister. President Hirawi signed the constitutional
amendment on September 21, 1990, implementing the reforms. Many Christian leaders and
General Awn opposed the reform, which followed the Taif proposals of September 1989.
On October 13, 1990, Syrian forces drove General Awn out of the Presidential palace
and into the French embassy where he was granted political asylum. Awn’s departure
appeared to end the 2-year stalemate, and open the way for the reform government under
President Hirawi to take full control of the government of Lebanon.
Political Dynamics
Lebanese groups have developed political parties along religious, geographical, ethnic,
ideological, foreign affiliation, or other lines. In general, Christian groups are more
conservative and better organized. The leading Christian parties (all led by Maronite
Christians) are the Phalange, previously led by the Jumayyil family, the National Bloc, led
by the Iddi family, the National Liberal Party, led by the Shamun family, and the Maradah,
led by the Franjiyah family. Leading Muslim parties are the Shia Muslim Amal, the Shia
Hizballah, the Sunni Independent Nasirite Movement, and the Progressive Socialist Party
(primarily composed of Druze). Another party, the Syrian National Socialist Party (favors
union with Syria), is predominantly Muslim although it has had some Greek Orthodox
leaders. Political parties form alliances and coalitions, usually temporary and subject to
shifting issues, foreign influence, and personality clashes. Many of the political parties or
other groups have armed militias for protection. In 1975, an incident between Palestinians
and Phalangist Christians triggered a civil war that pitted conservatives against liberals and
Muslims against Christians.
In recent years, the Lebanese political community also divided between the old guard
elites who practiced politics under the traditional family-led parties, and younger, modern
reformers or dissidents who formed political blocs based more on issues and ideologies. For
example, the Phalange (traditionally conservative Maronite Christian) separated into factions,
one led by George Saadeh and maintaining its allegiance to the Jumayyil family in the
traditional manner; another following a Jumayyil lieutenant, Samir Jaja, who broke away in
a personality and power struggle to form the Lebanese Forces; and a third, the Al-Wad party
of Eli Hubayqah, who broke away from Jaja. (Jaja is in prison for murder and Hubayqah was
assassinated in January 2002.) Similarly, dissident leaders of Amal, the Shia Muslim party,
broke away to form the more radical Movement of the Deprived, and another radical faction
broke away to form the Islamic Amal group. Hizballah, which started as a branch of an
Iranian religious group, was associated with hostage seizures and terrorism and was involved
in a 2-year war with Amal vying for control of Lebanon’s Shia Muslims. Hizballah and
Amal resolved their differences and formed an alliance for the 1992 elections, with the
coalition winning enough seats to dominate the Shia Muslim bloc in the new Parliament.
Amal and Hizballah formed a similar alliance in the 1996 election, but Hizballah lost ground,
CRS-7

---

IB89118
07-11-03
going from 8 members and four supporters in 1992 to 7 members and two supporters in
1996. Hizballah supporters claimed 12 seats in the 2000 elections.
Lebanon’s Population. The following estimates of Lebanon’s population were
taken from Lebanon’s Political Mosaic, published by the Directorate of Intelligence of the
U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, NESA 92-10020, LDA 92-13537, August 1992. There has
been no census in Lebanon since 1932. Not all Lebanese agree with the CIA figures cited
below, and some maintain that the Christian communities are understated.
Table 1. Population Estimates, 1991
Number
Percent
Shia Muslim
1,140,000
38%
Sunni Muslim
690,000
23%
Maronite Christian
600,000
20%
Other Christian
360,000
12%
Druze
210,000
7%
Total
3,000,000
100%
1992, 1996, and 2000 Elections
Beginning in mid-July 1992, several Maronite leaders opined that the elections
tentatively scheduled for September 1992 should be delayed until after Syria agreed to
withdraw troops from Beirut. (The Taif agreement called for Lebanese-Syrian withdrawal
discussions and National Assembly elections 2 years after the accords were ratified, which
occurred on September 21, 1990.) The Maronites believed that the Syrian military presence
would intimidate voters and would extend the Syrian occupation of Lebanon. Syrian
officials said the elections should go on as scheduled, and that Syria would not withdraw
from Beirut in the near future even if the withdrawal discussions were held. The Maronites
announced an election boycott and called for general strikes on the election days. Many, but
not all, Maronites running for office withdrew their names, and most Maronites stayed away
from the polls.
The Maronite strategy appeared to backfire. The elections went on as scheduled despite
the Maronite boycott, and enough candidates and voters broke ranks with the mainstream
Maronites to elect the necessary number of Christians to the National Assembly. In the end,
more pro-Syrian Deputies were elected than would have been the case if the mainstream
Maronites had remained in the race.
The newly elected National Assembly met as scheduled on October 20, and elected
Amal leader Nabbi Birri to be the Speaker of the Parliament. On October 22, 1992,
following consultations with National Assembly members and Speaker Birri, President
Hirawi named Rafiq al-Hariri to be Prime Minister. Hariri named a 30-member cabinet on
October 31, consisting of a mix of new technocrats and old line politicians, and a mix of
Maronites, Greek Catholics, Greek Orthodox, Armenians, Sunni Muslims, Shia Muslims,
CRS-8

---

IB89118
07-11-03
and Druze. Prime Minister Hariri said the cabinet’s first task would be restoring the
economy.
The Maronites did participate in the 1996 elections, despite some pro-Syrian and
pro-Muslim manipulating of the voter districts. The National Assembly passed an election
law on July 11, 1996, that named the five provinces as election districts, but subdivided
Mount Lebanon into six sub-districts. Ten Assembly members petitioned the Constitutional
Court claiming the election law violated the constitutional principle of equality among
Lebanese, and the Court upheld their petition. A second law passed on August 13 was
similar to the first, but stipulated that the law would apply only to the 1996 election.
Members failed to acquire the necessary ten signatures on a petition to challenge the new
law, and the elections were held as scheduled with Mount Lebanon as the only subdivided
district. Pro-Syrian forces and the Druze realized the political advantage from the
manipulated voting district because the Druze were assured election in the smaller
sub-districts. Voter turn out was about 44% over the five Sundays for the election. As a
result of the election, National Assembly Speaker Nabbi Birri and Prime Minister Rafiq
Hariri each controlled their own blocs of about 20 seats each. For the most part, the
delegates elected in 1996 were pro-Syrian moderates. Syria did not support extremists from
the left or right. Hizballah won seven seats, a drop from the nine seats it won in 1992.
The 2000 elections were held on August 26 for the 63 seats representing Mount
Lebanon and the north and on September 3 for the 65 seats representing Beirut, the Bekaa,
and the south. Despite their political differences, President Lahud named former Prime
Minister Rafiq Hariri to form a new government. Hariri’s 30-man cabinet won a vote of
confidence on October 23, 2000.
Foreign Presence in Lebanon
Syria
Approximately 16,000 of the 35,000 Syrian military troops who entered Lebanon in
March 1976 in response to President Fanjiyah’s appeal to protect the Christians, continue to
occupy the north above Tripoli, the Beqaa Valley north of the town of Rashayah, and the
Beirut-Damascus highway. Between May 1988 and June 2001, Syrian forces occupied most
of west Beirut. (Syrian forces did not venture south of a “red line” running east and west
across Lebanon near Rashayah. South of the line was considered Israeli Defense Forces (IDF)
operating area.) In October 1990, Syrian tanks and infantry surrounded the Baabda
presidential palace in east Beirut where General Awn had been besieged since September
1989. On October 13, Syrian aircraft bombed and strafed the palace, causing General Awn
to flee to the French embassy where he sought asylum.
In October 1989, as part of the Taif agreements, Syria agreed to begin discussions on
possible Syrian troop withdrawals from Beirut to the Beqaa Valley 2 years after political
reforms were implemented (President Hirawi signed the reforms in September 1990), and
to withdraw entirely from Lebanon after an Israeli withdrawal. The withdrawal discussions,
which should have started in September 1992, have not yet begun, in part because the
Lebanese government said it needed more time to establish its authority over the country.
CRS-9

---

IB89118
07-11-03
Syrian officials maintain that they are waiting for the Lebanese government to complete
rebuilding the army and police forces and assume security responsibilities in Lebanon before
beginning the withdrawal discussions.
Syria and Lebanon signed a treaty of brotherhood, cooperation, and coordination in May
1991, which calls for creating several joint committees that will coordinate policies. Some
observers speculate that the treaty will lead to Syrian domination (if not outright annexation)
of Lebanon, while others believe the treaty will enhance Syrian-Lebanese cooperation
without affecting Lebanese independence.
Observers speculate that Syria wants to maintain influence over Lebanon and Lebanese
affairs, particularly foreign and defense matters, to maintain the historical connection
between Syria and Lebanon, to protect Lebanon as a center for Syrian trade and business, to
ensure Lebanese support for Syrian positions in Arab councils, to deny Israel influence over
Lebanon, and to use Lebanon as a buffer against Israeli encroachment. Syria cultivates
relations with several Lebanese factions, including the National Syrian Socialist Party that
advocates a “Greater Syria,” the Shia Muslim Amal group (Shia Muslims are the majority
in Lebanon), the Druze and the Progressive Socialist Party (Lebanese Druze want to retain
access to the Syrian Druze community), and the Franjiyah-led Maronite Christians of
northern Lebanon to counter other Maronite forces. In contrast, other Lebanese factions, led
primarily by Maronite Christians, are becoming more vocal in advocating a Syrian
withdrawal.
Beginning June 14, 2001, 6,000 Syrian armed forces personnel withdrew from Beirut,
along with tanks and armored personnel carriers, and returned to Syria. About 20,000 Syrian
forces remained in northern and eastern Lebanon. It was not clear why the Syrian forces
withdrew: some speculated that the movement was part of a secret quid pro quo with Israel;
others speculated that Syria feared conflict with Israeli forces; others speculated that the
Syrian forces were needed in Damascus to protect the regime. Another 4,000 Syrian troops
withdrew in March 2003.
Israel
On March 14, 1978, Israel invaded and occupied Lebanese territory south of the Litani
River, to destroy Palestinian bases that Israel believed were the source of attacks against
Israelis. Israeli forces withdrew on June 13, 1978, after the United Nations Interim Force in
Lebanon (UNIFIL) was placed south of the Litani to serve as a buffer between Israel and the
Palestinians (U.N.S.C. Resolution 425, March 19, 1978). Israeli forces again invaded
Lebanon on June 6, 1982. The IDF overran the UNIFIL positions, occupied southern
Lebanon, defeated Syrian forces in the southern Beqaa, laid siege to Beirut, and killed
approximately 20,000 Lebanese and Palestinians. Israeli forces withdrew in 3 stages,
completing the primary withdrawal in June 1985. About 1,000 Israeli troops, in cooperation
with the 2,000-3,000 man South Lebanon Army, patrolled the “security zone,” the
10-mile-wide strip along the Lebanon-Israel border that the Israelis held since the 1982
invasion. Israel continued its air and artillery retaliation against Palestinian and Lebanese
armed forces that attack IDF and South Lebanon Army positions.
Between 1978 and 2000, Israel lost 900 soldiers killed in Lebanon and the SLA lost 400
killed; about 2,100 Palestinian and Lebanese guerrillas and 21,000 Lebanese civilians have
CRS-10

---

IB89118
07-11-03
died in clashes with the IDF and the SLA. Following an Israeli cabinet vote on March 5,
2000, the IDF began withdrawing in mid-May 2000, intending to leave the SLA in their place
as the IDF moved south. On May 22, the SLA abandoned their positions, compelling the IDF
to pull out of Lebanon during the night of May 23/24. Some 500 Hizballah fighters moved
in behind the retreating IDF and SLA to take control of the south. Israel gave asylum to about
6,000 SLA members and their families. Hizballah turned over more than 1,500 SLA fighters
to the Lebanese government for trial as traitors.
CHRONOLOGY
04/15/03 —
Prime Minister Hariri resigned, but formed a new government within two
days that had no anti-Syrian members.
03/04/03 ––
Syria completed withdrawing 4,000 troops from northern Lebanon.
04/18/02 ––
Prime Minister Hariri met with President Bush at the White House.
11/08/01 ––
Lebanon rejected the U.S. request to freeze Hizballah assets following the
November 2 U.S. listing of Hizballah as a terror organization. Many
Lebanese consider Hizballah a resistance movement that freed Lebanon of
the Israeli occupation.
06/14/01 ––
About 6,000 Syrian troops began withdrawing from Beirut.
09/03/00 ––
Lebanon completed two rounds of voting for the 128-seat parliament. Rafiq
Hariri and his 30-man cabinet were sworn in on October 26, 2000.
05/23/00 ––
Israeli forces completed the withdrawal from southern Lebanon. The South
Lebanon Army collapsed as the IDF withdrew. Some 1,500 SLA members
were tried by the Lebanese government for treason, and some 6,000 SLA
members and their families sought asylum in Israel.
03/05/00 ––
The Israeli cabinet voted to withdraw from Lebanon by July 7.
02/09/00 ––
President Clinton said the Israeli attacks against Lebanon were in retaliation
for the Hizballah attacks against Israeli Defense Force personnel.
05/17/99 —
Following his election as Prime Minister of Israel, Ehud Barak repeated his
campaign pledge that Israeli troops would be out of Lebanon within one year.
11/30/98 —
Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri resigned. President Lahud named Salim al-Huss
to form a new cabinet on December 2.
10/15/98 —
The Parliament elected Emile Lahud to be President, replacing Elias Hawari.
Lahud was granted a constitutional waiver to serve as President without
waiting 5 years since leaving the army.
CRS-11

---

IB89118
07-11-03
07/30/97 —
Secretary of State Albright announced that the travel ban on Lebanon,
implemented in 1987, would not be extended.
12/15/96 —
Donors attending a Washington conference pledged $1 billion in grants,
loans, and investments to help rebuild Lebanon. The United States announced
that it would increase its aid to Lebanon to $12 million for FY1997.
08/18/96 —
Lebanon began the five-stage election for the National Assembly.
04/26/96 —
Secretary of State Christopher negotiated a cease-fire between Israel and
Hizballah where the two sides agreed not to fire on civilian populations. As
part of the agreement, Israel, Lebanon, Syria, France, and the United States
formed an observer group to report on violations of the agreement.
04/11/96 —
Israel launched an air, artillery, and naval barrage at southern Lebanon in
retaliation for Hizballah rocket attacks against northern Israeli cities. Over
the next 15 days, 20,000 Israelis evacuated northern Israel, and between
400,000 and 500,000 Lebanese fled north to avoid the fighting. More than
150 Lebanese were killed
10/11/95 —
Syrian President al-Assad announced that Lebanese President Hirawi’s term
of office would be extended for 3 years. On October 19, the Lebanese
parliament passed an amendment to the constitution permitting the extension.
President Hirawi was sworn in for an additional 3 years on November 25.
07/25/93 —
Israel began a seven-day air, artillery, and naval bombardment of southern
Lebanon in retaliation for the deaths of seven Israeli soldiers. In the
exchange, three Israelis and 130 Lebanese were killed. Israeli Prime Minister
Rabin said the bombardment was intended to drive civilians north to Beirut
where they would force the government to stop Hizballah. As a result of the
Israeli bombardment, about 250,000 Lebanese became refugees.
07/01/93 —
The U.S. Senate passed S.Con.Res. 28 stating that Syria had violated the Taif
agreement by not withdrawing from Lebanon in September 1992.
12/16/92 —
Israel began deporting 415 Palestinian members or suspected members of
Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement) from the occupied territories into
southern Lebanon. Lebanon refused to allow the deportees to leave the
Israeli security strip and enter Lebanese-controlled territory. The last of the
deportees returned to Israeli prisons on December 15, 1993.
10/20/92 —
The National Assembly met and elected Nabbi Birri as Speaker. On October
22, President Hirawi named Rafiq al-Hariri as Prime Minister, and Hariri
named a 30-man cabinet on October 31.
09/21/92 —
Syria and Lebanon did not begin the discussions for Syrian armed forces
withdrawal as called for in the Taif agreement (see August 21, 1990, below).
According to press sources, Lebanon did not request the talks because the
CRS-12

---

IB89118
07-11-03
Lebanese government did not believe it was strong enough to assume control
as Syria withdrew from the south, Beirut, and the Biqa Valley.
08/23/92 —
Lebanon began three-step elections for parliament. Most Maronites
boycotted the election.
10/30/91 —
Lebanon participated in the Madrid peace conference (although it was widely
understood that Lebanon and Israel would not sign a peace treaty until after
Syria and Israel resolved their differences).
10/26/90 —
The Lebanese Forces under Samir Jaja, the Amal militia under Nabbi Birri,
and the Druze forces under Walid Jumblatt agreed to withdraw their militias
from Beirut, leaving the Lebanese Armed Forces in control.
10/13/90 —
General Awn sought political asylum at the French embassy after Syrian
tanks and planes attacked his refuge at Baabda palace. Awn left for France
one year later.
08/21/90
—
The National Assembly passed amendments to the
Constitution
implementing the Taif reforms. President Hirawi signed the amendments on
September 21 (the date many cite as beginning the 2-year period before the
Lebanon-Syria withdrawal discussions were scheduled to begin).
11/22/89 —
President Muawwad was assassinated. On November 24, the National
Assembly Deputies elected Ilyas Hirawi President to replace Muawwad.
11/05/89 —
The National Assembly approved the Taif reform package, elected a new
Speaker, and elected Rene Muawwad as President of Lebanon.
10/22/89 —
Some 60 National Assembly deputies, meeting in Taif, Saudi Arabia, agreed
to government reforms that included increasing the National Assembly from
99 to 108 members evenly divided between Christian and Muslim/Druze,
disarming the militias, and calling for discussions of a Syrian withdrawal
within 2 years after ratification of the “Taif” agreement. On July 16, 1992, the
National Assembly raised the number of Deputies from 108 to 128 and
reconfirmed the 4-year term of office.
09/06/89 —
U.S. Ambassador John McCarthy closed the U.S. embassy annex in Awkar
following anti-American demonstrations and threats from General Awn.
New U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker reopened the embassy annex on
November 29, 1990.
01/00/89 —
Fighting resumed between Hizballah and Amal, and between General Awn’s
government forces and several Christian militias. By March, Hizballah
defeated Amal and controlled the left, and Awn’s forces controlled the right.
But Awn was defeated and isolated after he attempted to drive the Syrian
forces out of Lebanon. The Arab League secured a cease-fire in September
1989.
CRS-13

---

IB89118
07-11-03
09/23/88 —
Outgoing President Amin Jumayyil appointed Army Commander-in-Chief
General Michel Awn to be Prime Minister. The National Assembly had failed
to elect Jumayyil’s successor in August. Awn’s appointment meant that
Lebanon had two Prime Ministers, two cabinets, a stalemated parliament, and
no President.
06/00/85 —
Israel completed its withdrawal from Lebanon except for the 10-mile wide
strip along the Lebanon-Israel border.
09/20/84 —
A truck bomb killed 20 (two of whom were U.S. citizens) at the U.S.
embassy annex in Awkar.
02/00/84 —
The U.S. contingent in the MultiNational Force withdrew from Lebanon.
The French, Italian, and British contingents were out of Lebanon by the end
of March.
10/23/83 —
A truck bomb killed 241 U.S. military personnel at the U.S. MNF
headquarters at the Beirut airport.
04/18/83 —
A truck bomb destroyed the U.S. embassy in Beirut, killing 63 people (17 of
whom were U.S. citizens) and wounding 100 (40 of whom were U.S.
citizens).
09/18/82 —
The press reported that about 1,700 Palestinians had been murdered,
reportedly by Christian militiamen, in the Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps
of southern Beirut. Two days later, the Lebanese government requested that
the MNF return to Beirut to stabilize the situation. The first MNF contingent
returned on September 24, 1982.
09/14/82 —
A bomb killed President-elect Bashir Jumayyil. The next day, Israeli troops
occupied southern Beirut.
08/00/82 —
U.S. diplomat Philip Habib negotiated an agreement whereby Israel agreed
to withdraw its troops from Lebanon. The United States, France, Italy, and
Great Britain sent peacekeeping forces to Lebanon to monitor the Palestine
Liberation Organization from Beirut.
06/06/82 —
Israel invaded Lebanon and occupied southern Lebanon up to the Beirut-
Damascus road.
03/14/78 —
Israel invaded southern Lebanon. The United Nations Interim Force in
Lebanon (UNIFIL) established an east-to-west buffer zone across southern
Lebanon to separate Israeli and Lebanese forces. Israel withdrew its troops
on June 13, 1978.
07/00/58 —
President Eisenhower dispatched 14,300 U.S. Marine and Army personnel to
Lebanon to support the Lebanese government in resisting a radical seizure of
the country. The U.S. forces were withdrawn in October.
CRS-14

---

IB89118
07-11-03
Table 2. U.S. Assistance to Lebanon
(millions of dollars)
Economic Aid
Food Aid
Military Aid
I.M.E.T.
Year
Total
(Grants)
(Grants)
(Loans)
(Grants)
1946 - 1980
332.7
120.2a
86.2b
123.3c
3.0
1981
24.3
4.0
0
20.0
0.3
1982
21.8
9.0
2.2
10.0
0.6
1983
153.9
52.2
0
100.0
1.7
1984
44.0
28.1
0.3
15.0
0.6
1985
21.1
19.9
0.5
0
0.7
1986
17.6
16.0
1.1
0
0.5
1987
23.0
12.8
9.7
0
0.5
1988
12.3
5.1
6.8
0
0.4
1989
15.5
2.8
12.3
0
0.4
1990
19.4
8.3
10.7
0
0.4
1991
19.2
9.3
9.9
0
0
1992
16.4
9.2
7.2
0
0
1993
14.4
10.3
3.5
0
0.6
1994
2.0
1.7
0
0
0.3
1995
16.0
15.6d
0
0
0.4
1996
2.5
2.0
0
0
0.5
1997
12.8
12.3
0
0
0.5
1998
12.6
12.0
0
0
0.6
1999
12.6
12.0
0
0
0.6
2000
15.6
15.0
0
0
0.6
2001
35.4
34.9
0
0
0.5
2002 est.
35.6
35.0
0
0
0.6
Totals
880.7
447.7
150.4
268.3
14.3
I.M.E.T. = International Military Education and Training
Source: U.S. Agency for International Development, U.S. Overseas Loans and Grants
a. Of the $120.2 million total, $19 million was loans.
b. Of the $86.2 million total, $28.5 million was loans.
c. Of the $123.3 million total, $109.5 was loans and $13.8 million was grants.
d. Includes about $6 million from 1994.
CRS-15

---