Order Code IB10096
Issue Brief for Congress
Received through the CRS Web
Congressional Budget Actions in 2002
Updated July 9, 2002
Bill Heniff Jr.
Government and Finance Division
Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

---

CONTENTS
SUMMARY
MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
Overview of the Congressional Budget Process
Budget Resolution
Reconciliation Legislation
Revenue and Debt-Limit Legislation
Appropriations and Other Spending Legislation
Budget Enforcement and Sequestration
LEGISLATION
CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS, REPORTS, AND DOCUMENTS
CHRONOLOGY
FOR ADDITIONAL READING

---

IB10096
07-09-02
Congressional Budget Actions in 2002
SUMMARY
During the second session of the 107th
mented through the enactment of reconcilia-
Congress, the House and Senate will consider
tion bills, revenue and debt-limit legislation,
many different budgetary measures. Most of
and appropriations and other spending mea-
these measures will pertain to FY2003 (which
sures, and enforced by points of order that
will begin on October 1, 2002) and beyond,
may be raised when legislation is pending on
but some may make adjustments to the budget
the House and Senate floor.
for FY2002. As the congressional session
progresses, this issue brief will describe
The House adopted its version of the
House and Senate action on major budgetary
FY2003 budget resolution, H.Con.Res. 353,
legislation within the framework of the con-
on March 20. In the absence of an agreement
gressional budget process and other proce-
with the Senate, the House adopted a resolu-
dural requirements.
tion “deeming” its budget resolution to have
been adopted by Congress for budget enforce-
Congress begins its annual budget pro-
ment purposes. The Senate Budget Commit-
cess once the President submits his budget.
tee reported its version of the FY2003 budget
President Bush submitted his FY2003 budget
resolution, S.Con.Res. 100, on March 22.
to Congress on February 4, 2002.
Budget legislation also is constrained by
In preparation for congressional action on
limits on discretionary spending and a “pay-
the budget, CBO released its annual report on
as-you-go” (PAYGO) requirement for direct
budget baseline projections, The Budget and
spending and revenue legislation established
Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2003-2012,
under the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990, as
on January 31. CBO updated these budget
amended.
baseline projections, based on new technical
assumptions and a revised economic forecast,
Currently, adjustable discretionary spend-
in its report, Analysis of the President’s Bud-
ing limits exist for the following categories:
getary Proposals for Fiscal Year 2003, re-
highway and mass transit spending for
leased on March 6.
FY2002-FY2003; conservation spending
(divided into six subcategories) for FY2002-
The Congressional Budget Act of 1974
FY2006; and other discretionary spending,
established the congressional budget process.
also called general purpose discretionary
The process is centered on the adoption of an
spending, for FY2002. However, the seques-
annual concurrent resolution on the budget.
tration process established to enforce the
The budget resolution sets forth aggregate
discretionary spending limits expires at the
spending and revenue levels, and spending
end of FY2002 (i.e., September 30, 2002), and
levels by major functional area, for at least 5
it is not yet clear whether Congress and the
fiscal years. It is an agreement between the
President will extend it.
House and Senate on a congressional budget
plan, providing a framework for subsequent
The PAYGO requirement also expires at
budgetary legislation during a congressional
the end of FY2002, but the PAYGO seques-
session.
tration process covers the net effects through
FY2006 of new direct spending and revenue
Budget resolution policies are imple-
legislation enacted before the end of FY2002.
Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

---

IB10096
07-09-02
MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
On June 28, 2002, President Bush signed into law S. 2578, an act to increase the
public-debt limit by $450 billion (P.L. 107-199). The legislation had been approved by the
Senate on June 11 and the House on June 27.
On June 27, the House adopted the first two regular appropriations acts for FY2003:
H.R. 5010, Department of Defense Appropriations Act and H.R. 5011, Department of
Interior Appropriations Act. Also on June 27, the House adopted H.R. 4954, the Medicare
Modernization and Prescription Drug Act of 2002, which provides a voluntary program for
prescription drug coverage under the Medicare program, among other things.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
During the second session of the 107th Congress, the House and Senate will consider
many different budgetary measures. Most of these measures will pertain to FY2003 (which
will begin on October 1, 2002) and beyond, but some may make adjustments to the budget
for FY2002. As the congressional session progresses, this issue brief will describe House
and Senate action on major budgetary legislation within the framework of the congressional
budget process and other procedural requirements.
This year, Congress faces a significantly different procedural and budget environment
than in recent years. Not only are key enforcement procedures under the Budget
Enforcement Act (Title XIII of P.L. 101-508) set to expire at the end of FY2002 (i.e.,
September 30, 2002), the current and long-term budget outlook has changed considerably
from a year ago. Last year, CBO projected federal surpluses in each fiscal year through
FY2011 and a cumulative surplus of $5.6 trillion for FY2002-FY2011, under policies
existing at that time.1 In contrast, CBO Director Dan L. Crippen testified before the House
and Senate Budget Committees on January 23, 2002, that CBO now is projecting that both
fiscal years 2002 and 2003 will show small deficits, if current policies remain the same and
the economy performs as CBO forecasts. Further, the projected cumulative surplus for
FY2002 through FY2011 has dropped by $4.0 trillion to $1.6 trillion. The new environment
undoubtedly will have a significant effect on congressional budget actions during this
session.
Overview of the Congressional Budget Process
The congressional budget process consists of the consideration and adoption of
spending, revenue, and debt-limit legislation within the framework of an annual concurrent
resolution on the budget. Additionally, congressional action on budget legislation is
constrained by limits on discretionary spending and a “pay-as-you-go” (PAYGO)
requirement for direct spending and revenue legislation.
1 Congressional Budget Office, The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2002-2011, Jan.
2001.
CRS-1

---

IB10096
07-09-02
Congress begins its budget process once the President submits his budget. The
President is required by law to submit a comprehensive federal budget no later than the first
Monday in February. The President’s budget includes estimates of direct spending and
revenues under existing laws, as well as requests for discretionary spending (i.e., funds
provided through the appropriations process) for the upcoming fiscal year. In addition, the
President frequently proposes new initiatives in his budget submission to Congress.
Although Congress is not bound by the President’s budget, congressional action on spending
and revenue legislation often is influenced by his recommendations, as well as subsequent
budgetary activities by the President during the year. The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) assists the President in formulating and coordinating his budget policies and
activities.
On February 4, 2002, President Bush submitted his FY2003 budget to Congress.
Following the usual practice, the President’s budget was submitted as a multi-volume set
consisting of a main document, which includes the President’s budget message and
information on his 2003 proposals (Budget), and supplementary documents, which provide
special budgetary analyses (Analytical Perspectives), historical budget information
(Historical Tables), and detailed account and program level information (Appendix), among
other things. These documents are available from the Government Printing Office or on
OMB’s Web site at [http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb].
The Congressional Budget Act (CBA) of 1974 (Titles I-IX of P.L. 93-344) established
the congressional budget process, including a timetable for congressional action on budget
legislation (see Table 1). The process is centered on the adoption of an annual concurrent
resolution on the budget. The budget resolution sets forth aggregate spending and revenue
levels, and spending levels by major functional area, for at least 5 fiscal years. Because the
budget resolution is a concurrent resolution, it is not presented to the President for his
signature and thus does not become law. Instead, it is an agreement between the House and
Senate on a congressional budget plan, providing a framework for subsequent legislative
action on the budget during each congressional session.
CRS-2

---

IB10096
07-09-02
Table 1. The Congressional Budget Process Timetable
On or before
Action to be completed
First Monday in
President submits budget to Congress.
February
February 15
Congressional Budget Office submits economic and
budget outlook report to Budget Committees.
6 weeks after President
Committees submit views and estimates to Budget
submits budget
Committees.
April 1
Senate Budget Committee reports budget resolution.
April 15
Congress completes action on budget resolution.
May 15
Annual appropriations bills may be considered in the
House, even if action on budget resolution has not been
completed.
June 10
House Appropriations Committee reports last annual
appropriations bill.
June 15
House completes action on reconciliation legislation (if
required by budget resolution).
June 30
House completes action on annual appropriations bills.
July 15
President submits mid-session review of his budget to
Congress.
October 1
Fiscal year begins.
Because the budget resolution does not become law, budget policies are implemented
through the enactment of reconciliation bills, revenue and debt-limit legislation, and
appropriations and other spending measures. Congress enforces budget resolution policies
through points of order on the floor of each chamber and the reconciliation process. For
example, any legislation that would cause the aggregate levels to be violated is prohibited
from being considered. Further, the total budget authority and outlays set forth in the budget
resolution are allocated among the House and Senate committees having jurisdiction over
specific spending legislation. Any legislation, or amendment, that would cause these
committee allocations to be exceeded is prohibited. Finally, the House and Senate
Appropriations Committees subdivide their allocations among their respective 13
subcommittees. A point of order may be raised against any appropriations act, or
amendment, that would cause one of these subdivisions to be exceeded.2 Congress also may
use reconciliation legislation (discussed further below) to enforce direct spending, revenue,
and debt-limit provisions of a budget resolution.
2 For more detailed information on these points of order and their application, see CRS Report 97-
865, Points of Order in the Congressional Budget Process, by James V. Saturno.
CRS-3

---

IB10096
07-09-02
In addition to the enforcement procedures associated with the budget resolution, budget
legislation is constrained by statutory limits on discretionary spending and a PAYGO
requirement for direct spending and revenue legislation, both established by the Budget
Enforcement Act (BEA) of 1990 (Title XIII of P.L. 101-508), which amended the Balanced
Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Title II of P.L. 99-177).
Currently, adjustable discretionary spending limits exist for the following categories:
highway and mass transit spending for FY2002-FY2003; conservation spending (divided into
six subcategories) for FY2002-FY2006; and other discretionary spending, also called general
purpose discretionary spending, for FY2002. PAYGO generally requires that increases in
direct spending or decreases in revenues due to legislative action are offset so that the net
effects of new legislation do not incur a positive balance on the PAYGO scorecard. The
PAYGO requirement applies to legislation enacted through FY2002, but it covers the effects
of such legislation through FY2006.
The discretionary spending limits and PAYGO requirement are enforced primarily by
sequestration, which involves automatic, largely across-the-board spending cuts in non-
exempt programs. Sequestration is triggered if the director of the Office of Management and
Budget estimates in the final sequestration report at the end of a session that one or more of
the discretionary spending limits will be exceeded or the PAYGO requirement will be
violated. A within-session sequestration is possible if a supplemental appropriations bill
causes the spending levels of the current fiscal year to exceed the statutory limit for a
particular category. The discretionary spending limits, as well as a PAYGO requirement
similar to the statutory one, also may be enforced through points of order while legislation
is being considered on the Senate floor.
The sequestration process established to enforce the discretionary spending limits
expires at the end of FY2002 (i.e., September 30, 2002). The PAYGO sequestration process
continues until the end of FY2006, but only applies to the net effects of legislation enacted
before the end of FY2002.
Budget Resolution
The Congressional Budget Act, as amended, establishes the concurrent resolution on
the budget as the centerpiece of the congressional budget process. The budget resolution sets
forth aggregate spending and revenue levels, and spending levels by major functional area,
for at least 5 fiscal years. Once adopted, it provides the framework for subsequent action on
budget-related legislation.
The congressional budget process timetable sets April 15 as a target date for final
adoption of the budget resolution. The CBA prohibits the consideration of spending,
revenue, or debt-limit legislation for the upcoming year until the budget resolution has been
adopted, unless the rule is waived or set aside.
Following the submission of the President’s budget early in the year, Congress begins
formulating the budget resolution. The House and Senate Budget Committees are
responsible for developing and reporting the budget resolution. In formulating the budget
resolution, the Budget Committees hold hearings and receive testimony from Members of
CRS-4

---

IB10096
07-09-02
Congress and representatives from federal departments and agencies, the general public, and
national organizations. Three regular hearings include separate testimony from the Director
of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Chair of the Federal Reserve Board, and the
Director of OMB.3
The congressional budget resolution, as well as the President’s budget, is based on
budget baselines. The budget baseline is a projection of federal revenue, spending, and
deficit or surplus levels based upon current policies, assuming certain economic assumptions.
The President’s budget baseline, referred to as current services estimates, usually differs from
CBO’s baseline, referred to as baseline budget projections, often due to different economic
and technical assumptions. Baseline projections provide a benchmark for measuring the
budgetary effects of proposed policy changes. On January 31, 2002, CBO released its annual
report on budget baseline projections, The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years
2003-2012. On March 6, CBO released its Analysis of the President’s Budgetary Proposals
for Fiscal Year 2003. This report contains estimates of the President’s proposals using
CBO’s economic and technical assumptions. In addition, the report incorporates CBO’s new
technical assumptions and revised economic forecast, as well as updates its budget baseline
projections. Both of these reports are available on CBO’s Web site at [http://www.cbo.gov].
Another source of input comes from the “views and estimates” of congressional
committees with jurisdiction over spending and revenues. Within 6 weeks after the
President's budget submission, House and Senate committees are required to submit views
and estimates of budget matters under their jurisdiction to their respective Budget
Committees. These views and estimates, frequently submitted in the form of a letter to the
Chair and Ranking Member of the Budget Committee, typically include comments on the
President's budget proposals and estimates of the budgetary impact of any legislation likely
to be considered during the current session of Congress. The Budget Committees are not
bound by these recommendations. The views and estimates of Senate committees are printed
in the committee report accompanying the Budget Committee-reported budget resolution
(S.Rept. 107-141, pp. 72-164). The views and estimates of House committees will be printed
in a separate House Budget Committee print later in the session.
The budget resolution was designed to provide a framework to make budget decisions,
leaving specific program determinations to House and Senate Appropriations Committees
and other committees with spending and revenue jurisdiction. In many instances, however,
particular program changes are considered when formulating the budget resolution. Program
assumptions sometimes are referred to in the reports of the House and Senate Budget
Committees and usually are discussed during floor action. Although these program changes
are not binding, committees may be strongly influenced by these recommendations when
formulating appropriations bills, reconciliation measures, or other budgetary legislation.
3 The CBO Director, Dan L. Crippen, presented separate, but identical, testimony before the Senate
and House Budget Committees on Jan. 23, 2002. The testimony is available on CBO’s Web site at
[http://www.cbo.gov]. Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan testified before the
Senate Budget Committee on Jan. 24, 2002. OMB Director Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., presented
separate, but identical, testimony before the Senate and House Budget Committees on Feb. 5, 2002.
The latter two testimonies are available on the Senate Budget Committee’s Web site at
[http://www.senate.gov/~budget].
CRS-5

---

IB10096
07-09-02
On March 15, the House Budget Committee reported its version of the FY2003 budget
resolution (H.Con.Res. 353, H.Rept. 107-376), after a mark up on March 13. The Senate
Budget Committee marked up its version (S.Con.Res. 100, S.Rept. 107-141) on March 21,
and reported it to the full Senate the next day (March 22).
The House and Senate consider the budget resolution under procedures generally
intended to expedite final action. In the House, the budget resolution usually is considered
under a special rule, limiting the time of debate and allowing only a few amendments, as
substitutes to the entire resolution. On March 20 (legislative day, March 19), the Rules
Committee reported a special rule (H.Res. 372, H.Rept. 107-380) which allowed only a self-
executing amendment in the nature of a substitute and allowed 3 hours of general debate.
After adopting the rule by a vote of 222-206, the House considered and adopted H.Con.Res.
353 by a 221-209 vote, on March 20. In the absence of an agreement on a FY2003 budget
resolution with the Senate, the House adopted a so-called “deeming resolution.” The special
rule (H.Res. 428) governing the initial consideration of the emergency supplemental
appropriations act (H.R. 4775) included a provision “deeming” the House-adopted budget
resolution to have been agreed to by Congress. The House adopted this special rule by a
216-209 vote on May 22. Under the deeming resolution, the enforcement procedures of the
Congressional Budget Act, such as the limits on spending in the annual appropriations acts,
are effective in the House.4
The Senate considers the budget resolution under the procedures set forth in the CBA,
unless superseded by a unanimous consent agreement. Debate on the initial consideration
of the budget resolution, and all amendments, debatable motions, and appeals, is limited to
50 hours. Amendments, motions, and appeals may be considered beyond this time limit, but
without debate. Consideration of the conference report is limited to 10 hours in the Senate.
Reconciliation Legislation
Congress may implement changes to existing law related to direct spending, revenues,
or the debt limit through the reconciliation process, under Section 310 of the CBA. The
reconciliation process has two stages. First, Congress includes reconciliation instructions
in a budget resolution directing one or more committees to recommend changes in statute to
achieve the levels of spending, revenues, and debt limit agreed to in the budget resolution.
Second, the legislative language recommended by committees is packaged “without
substantive revision” into one or more reconciliation bills, as set forth in the budget
resolution, by the House and Senate Budget Committees. In some instances, a committee
may be required to report its legislative recommendations directly to its chamber.
4 The special rule also required the House Budget Committee chairman to submit for printing in the
Congressional Record the committee allocations, referred to as the 302(a) allocations, associated
with the House-adopted budget resolution spending levels. House Budget Committee Chairman Jim
Nussle submitted the allocations on May 22, 2002. See Congressional Record, daily edition, vol.
148 (May 22, 2002), pp. H2929-H2930. With the House-adopted budget resolution deemed to have
been passed by Congress, a point of order may be raised against legislation that would cause these
allocations to be exceeded.
CRS-6

---

IB10096
07-09-02
Once reconciliation legislation is reported, consideration is governed by special
procedures. These special rules serve to limit what may be included in reconciliation
legislation, to prohibit certain amendments, and to encourage its completion in a timely
fashion. In the House, as with the budget resolution, reconciliation legislation usually is
considered under a special rule, establishing the time allotted for debate and what
amendments will be in order. In the Senate, debate on a budget reconciliation bill, all
amendments, debatable motions, and appeals is limited to not more than 20 hours. After the
20 hours of debate has been reached, consideration of amendments, motions, and appeals
may continue, but without debate.
In both chambers, the CBA requires that amendments to reconciliation legislation be
deficit neutral and germane. Also, the CBA prohibits the consideration of reconciliation
legislation, or any amendment to a reconciliation bill, recommending changes to the Social
Security program. Finally, in the Senate, Section 313 of the CBA, commonly referred to as
the Byrd rule, prohibits extraneous matter in a reconciliation bill.
Revenue and Debt-Limit Legislation
Congress may adopt revenue and debt-limit legislation individually. Revenue and debt-
limit legislation is under the jurisdiction of the House Ways and Means Committee and the
Senate Finance Committee. Article I, Section 7, of the U.S. Constitution, requires revenue
legislation originate in the House of Representatives, but the Senate may amend a revenue
bill as it chooses.
Most of the laws establishing the federal government's revenue sources are permanent
and continue year after year without any additional legislative action. Congress, however,
typically enacts revenue legislation, changing some portion of the existing tax system, every
year. Revenue legislation may include changes to individual and corporate income taxes,
social insurance taxes, excise taxes, or tariffs and duties.
Revenue legislation is not automatically considered in the congressional budget process
on an annual basis. Frequently, however, the President proposes and Congress considers
changes in the rates of taxation or the distribution of the tax burden. An initial step in the
congressional budget process is the publication of revenue estimates of the President's budget
by CBO. These revenue estimates usually differ from the President's since they are based on
different economic and technical assumptions (e.g., growth of the economy and change in
the inflation rate). Estimates of any congressional revenue-policy proposals are prepared by
CBO, based on Joint Committee on Taxation revenue estimates, and are published in
committee reports or the Congressional Record.
The budget resolution includes baseline estimates of federal government receipts based
on the continuation of existing laws and any proposed policy changes. The revenue levels
in the budget resolution provide the framework for any action on revenue measures during
the session. A point of order may be raised against the consideration of legislation that
causes revenues to fall below the agreed upon levels for the first fiscal year or the total for
all fiscal years in the budget resolution. This point of order may be set aside by unanimous
consent, or waived by a special rule in the House or by a three-fifths vote in the Senate.
CRS-7

---

IB10096
07-09-02
A Senate PAYGO point of order, under Section 207 of the FY2000 budget resolution
(H.Con.Res. 68, 106th Congress), also may be raised against any revenue legislation that
would increase or cause an on-budget deficit for the first fiscal year, the period of the first
5 fiscal years, or the following 5 fiscal years, covered by the most recently adopted budget
resolution. The point of order may be waived by a vote of three-fifths of Senators, or set
aside by unanimous consent.
On January 23, 2002, the Senate began consideration of a scaled-down economic
recovery package that included tax-related provisions and an extension of unemployment
benefits, among other things. The House last year approved two economic stimulus
packages (H.R. 3090 and H.R. 3529) upon which the Senate did not vote. The scaled-down
package was introduced by Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle as an amendment in the
nature of a substitute to H.R. 622, a House-passed revenue bill dealing with adoption tax
credits that became law as part of other legislation last year. On February 6, after two cloture
motions failed to get the required three-fifths vote to end debate on the scaled-down recovery
package and a separate amendment, the Senate instead adopted by unanimous consent a
stand-alone amendment to H.R. 622 to provide temporary extended unemployment
compensation.
On February 14, the House agreed to a motion to agree with the Senate amendment to
H.R. 622 with a further amendment, which contained several of the provisions included in
the previously House-adopted H.R. 3529, by a vote of 225-199. The Senate did not act
further on this legislation, but instead adopted by unanimous consent a stand-alone
amendment to H.R. 3090 to provide temporary extended unemployment compensation.
On March 7, the House agreed to the Senate amendment to H.R. 3090 with a further
amendment, which contained a scaled-down economic recovery package of business-related
tax cuts and an extension of unemployment compensation, by a 417-3 vote. The Senate
subsequently agreed to the House amendment by a 85-9 vote on March 8. President Bush
signed H.R. 3090, the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002, into law (P.L. 107-
147) on March 9.
Two other major measures that contain provisions reducing revenues were adopted in
April, one in the House and one in the Senate. First, on April 18, the House approved by a
vote of 229-198 legislation (H.R. 586) to make permanent the tax cuts enacted in the
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (P.L. 107-16). Second, on
April 25, the Senate adopted energy policy legislation (H.R. 4) that contains several revenue,
as well as direct spending, provisions. The legislation is substantially different than the
version adopted by the House on August 2, 2001, by a 240-189 vote, and thus a conference
committee is expected to be convened in order to reconcile the two versions.
Federal debt consists of debt held by the public plus debt held by government accounts.
Almost all of the federal debt is subject to a statutory debt limit. The debt held by the public
represents the total net amount borrowed from the public to cover the federal government's
budget deficits. By contrast, the debt held by government accounts represents the total net
amount of federal debt issued to specialized federal accounts, primarily trust funds (e.g.,
Social Security). Trust fund surpluses by law must be invested in special federal government
securities and thus are held in the form of federal debt. Because the statutory limit applies
to the combination of both types of debt, budget deficits or trust fund surpluses may
CRS-8

---

IB10096
07-09-02
contribute to the federal government reaching the existing debt limit. So long as federal
budget policy results in an increase in the federal debt, Congress periodically must enact
increases to the debt limit.
The most recent increase in the statutory debt limit was enacted in the Balanced Budget
Act of 1997 (P.L. 105-33). At the time of passage, the increase to $5.95 trillion was
considered sufficient to meet the federal government’s financial needs through mid-
December 1999. The federal government’s surpluses over the last 4 years contributed to the
fact that the statutory debt limit has been sufficient beyond this date. However, Treasury
Secretary Paul O’Neill first indicated in a December 11, 2001, letter to congressional leaders
that the existing debt limit may begin to interfere with the federal government’s financial
responsibilities “as early as February 2002.”5 Therefore, he requested that Congress raise the
debt limit by $750 billion to $6.7 trillion.
On June 11, the Senate adopted S. 2578, legislation to increase the public-debt limit by
$450 billion, by a 68-29 vote. On June 27, the House adopted S. 2578 by a 215-214 vote.
President Bush signed the legislation into law (P.L. 107-199) on June 28.
Appropriations and Other Spending Legislation
Federal spending is categorized into two different types: discretionary or direct
spending. Discretionary spending is controlled through the annual appropriations acts, while
direct spending (which consists mostly of entitlement programs) is determined by existing
law.
Discretionary spending is under the jurisdiction of the House and Senate Appropriations
Committees. Direct spending is under the jurisdiction of the various legislative committees
of the House and Senate. Some entitlement programs, such as Medicaid and certain
veterans’ programs, are funded in annual appropriations acts, but such spending is not
considered discretionary and is not controlled through the annual appropriations process.
The President’s budget includes recommendations for the annual appropriations;
account and program level detail about these recommendations are included in the Appendix
volume of the President’s budget documents. In addition, agencies submit justification
materials to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. The budget justifications
provide more detailed information about an agency’s program activities than is contained in
the President’s budget documents and are used in support of agency testimony during
Appropriations subcommittee hearings on the President’s budget request.
Congress passes three main types of appropriations measures. Regular appropriations
acts provide budget authority for the next fiscal year, beginning on October 1. The 13
subcommittees of the Appropriations Committees of the House and Senate are each
5 Bud Newman,“Debt Ceiling Hike Not on House Agenda Before Adjournment, DeLay, Thomas
Say,” BNA Daily Report for Executives, no. 238 (Dec. 13, 2001), p. G-3. Also, for more information
on the current need to raise the debt limit, see CRS Report RS21111, The Debt Limit: The Need to
Raise It After Four Years of Surpluses, by Philip D. Winters.
CRS-9

---

IB10096
07-09-02
responsible for one of the 13 regular appropriations acts. Supplemental appropriations acts
provide additional funding for unexpected needs while the fiscal year is in progress.
Continuing appropriations acts, commonly referred to as continuing resolutions, provide
stop-gap funding for agencies that have not received a regular appropriations by the start of
the fiscal year.
Spending allocations to the Appropriations Committees and other committees
accompany the conference report on the budget resolution. Soon after it is adopted, the
House and Senate Appropriations Committees subdivide their spending allocations among
their subcommittees and formally report these suballocations to their respective chambers.
On June 25, 2002, the House Appropriations Committee reported its suballocations to the
House (H.Rept. 107-529). During the appropriations process, these suballocations usually
are revised several times.
The House and Senate appropriations subcommittees begin holding extensive hearings
on appropriations requests shortly after the President’s budget is submitted. By custom,
appropriations measures originate in the House. In recent years, the Senate Appropriations
Committee has adopted and reported original Senate appropriations measures, allowing the
Senate to consider appropriations measures without having to wait for the House to adopt its
version. Under this practice, the Senate version is considered and amended on the floor, and
then inserted into the House-adopted version, when available, as a substitute amendment,
thereby retaining the House-numbered bill for final action.
In addition to the 13 regular appropriations acts, Congress typically acts on at least two
supplemental appropriations measures during a session. Congress also often adopts one or
more continuing resolutions each year because of recurring delays in the appropriations
process. In 2001, for example, Congress passed the 13 regular appropriations measures
individually, two supplementals, and eight continuing resolutions. In some years, such as
in each of the three prior to 2001 (1998-2000), instead of adopting all of the regular
appropriations acts individually, Congress combines several of them into an omnibus
appropriations measure.
On March 21, 2002, President Bush submitted a $27.1 billion emergency supplemental
appropriations request for FY2002 to provide additional resources for the war on terrorism,
homeland security, and economic recovery.6 On May 21, 2002, President Bush submitted
a second FY2002 emergency supplemental appropriations request for $1.1 billion.7
On May 20, 2002, in response to the President’s request, the House Appropriations
Committee reported H.R. 4775, making supplemental appropriations for FY2002 (H.Rept.
107-480). The House considered H.R. 4775 first under an open rule (H.Res. 428) and
subsequently under a closed rule (H.Res. 431) on May 22, 23, and 24. H.R. 4775 was
adopted by the House on May 24 on a 280-138 vote. In the Senate, the Senate
Appropriations Committee reported a FY2002 supplemental appropriations act (S. 2551,
6 The text of the President’s request to Congress is available on the Internet at
[http://w3.access.gpo.gov/usbudget/fy2003/pdf/5usattack.pdf].
7 The text of the President’s request to Congress is available on the Internet at
[http://w3.access.gpo.gov/usbudget/fy2003/pdf/10va_doi.pdf].
CRS-10

---

IB10096
07-09-02
S.Rept. 107-156) on May 22. After incorporating S. 2551 in H.R. 4775 as an amendment,
the Senate began consideration of the supplemental appropriations measure on June 3.
During consideration of H.R. 4775, the Senate invoked cloture by a 87-10 vote on June 6.
The next day (June 7) the Senate passed H.R. 4775, as amended, by a vote of 71-22. A
conference committee has been convened to reconcile the differences between the House-
and Senate-versions of H.R. 4775.
During the week of June 24, the House began to consider the regular appropriations bills
for FY2003.8 On June 27, the House adopted the Department of Defense Appropriations Act
(H.R. 5010, H.Rept. 107-532) and the Military Construction Appropriations Act (H.R. 5011,
H.Rept. 107-533) by votes of 413-18 and 426-1, respectively.
Congress often considers major legislation affecting direct spending programs as well.
On several occasions in the past, Congress has included reserve funds in the budget
resolution to accommodate specific direct spending legislation. Under the provisions of a
reserve fund, the chairmen of the House and Senate Budget Committees may revise the
committee spending allocations and other budget resolution levels if certain legislation is
reported by the appropriate committee. Without such an adjustment, direct spending
legislation might be subject to points of order if it was not assumed in the budget resolution
spending amounts.
The House-adopted FY2003 budget resolution, which was deemed by the House to have
been adopted by Congress, includes seven reserve funds, two of which are related to direct
spending legislation. First, Section 202 of H.Con.Res. 353 provides a reserve fund for
legislation reforming the Medicare program, including adding a prescription drug benefit.
Second, Section 212 of H.Con.Res. 353 provides a reserve fund for legislation subjecting the
administrative expenses for student loans to the annual appropriations process.
On June 27, House Budget Chairman Jim Nussle, under the authority of Section 202
of H.Con.Res. 353, revised the appropriate spending allocations to accommodate H.R. 4954,
the Medicare Modernization and Prescription Drug Act of 2002.9 Subsequently, the House
considered H.R. 4954 under a closed rule (H.Res. 465), which passed by a vote of 218-213.
The rule provided for an amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report
(H.Rept. 107-553) accompanying the rule to be adopted automatically. The rule also
provided that a motion to recommit would be in order. The motion to recommit with
instructions was offered by House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt, and was defeated by
a 204-223 vote. Subsequently, the House adopted H.R. 4954 by a 221-208 vote.
Budget Enforcement and Sequestration
The sequestration process was first established in 1985 by the Balanced Budget and
Emergency Deficit Control Act, commonly known as the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act.
Initially, the sequestration process was tied to annual maximum deficit targets established
8 For the up-to-date status of and further information on the FY2003 appropriations bills, see the
CRS Appropriations Web site at [http://www.crs.gov/products/appropriations/apppage.shtml].
9 See Congressional Record, daily edition, vol. 148 (June 27, 2002), p. H4322.
CRS-11

---

IB10096
07-09-02
in law, declining to zero by FY1991. If the budget deficit exceeded those target levels (plus
a margin-of-error amount in some years), automatic across-the-board spending cuts would
be triggered to bring the deficit to within the allowable level. The process was intended to
provide an incentive to Congress and the President to reduce the deficit through legislative
action to avoid an automatic sequestration. The law was amended and modified in 1987,
1990, 1993, and 1997. Most notably, the Budget Enforcement Act (BEA) of 1990 changed
the focus of the sequestration process. Instead of maximum deficit targets, the BEA of 1990
tied sequestration to new statutory limits on discretionary spending and a PAYGO
requirement for new direct spending and revenue legislation. The change was intended to
hold Congress and the President accountable for projected budget outcomes that would result
from new legislation, rather than the level of the deficit which could be affected by factors
beyond their direct control, such as economic growth, inflation, and demographic changes.
Currently, adjustable discretionary spending limits exist for the following categories:
highway and mass transit spending for FY2002-FY2003; conservation spending (divided into
six subcategories) for FY2002-FY2006; and other discretionary spending, also called general
purpose discretionary spending, for FY2002. Under the PAYGO requirement, the net effect
of new direct spending and revenue legislation enacted for a fiscal year may not cause a
positive balance (reflecting an increase in the on-budget deficit or a reduction in the on-
budget surplus) on a multiyear PAYGO “scorecard.” For each fiscal year, this scorecard
maintains the balances of the accumulated budgetary effects of laws enacted during the
session and prior years. The PAYGO requirement applies to legislation enacted through
FY2002, but it covers the effects of such legislation through FY2006.
The discretionary spending limits and PAYGO requirement are enforced primarily by
sequestration, which involves automatic, largely across-the-board spending cuts in non-
exempt programs. Sequestration is triggered if the director of the Office of Management and
Budget estimates in the final sequestration report that one or more of the discretionary
spending limits will be exceeded or the PAYGO requirement will be violated. The President
is required to issue a sequestration order cancelling budgetary resources in non-exempt
programs by the amount of any spending limit breach or PAYGO violation. A within-
session sequestration is possible if a supplemental appropriations bill causes the spending
levels of the current fiscal year to exceed the statutory limit for a particular category.10
The discretionary spending limits, as well as a PAYGO requirement similar to the
statutory one, also may be enforced through points of order while legislation is being
considered on the Senate floor. First, Section 312(b) of the 1974 CBA prohibits the
consideration of legislation that would cause any of the spending limits to be exceeded.
Second, Section 207 of the FY2000 budget resolution (H.Con.Res. 68, 106th Congress), like
similar provisions in previous budget resolutions, provides a point of order against any direct
spending or revenue legislation that would increase or cause an on-budget deficit for the first
fiscal year, the period of the first 5 fiscal years, or the following 5 fiscal years, covered by
10 Under the BEA, if a supplemental appropriations act causes a discretionary spending limit to be
exceeded in the last quarter of a fiscal year (i.e., July 1 through September 30), the spending limit
for the applicable category for the following fiscal year must be reduced by the amount of the
violation. However, this particular procedure will have no effect this year, unless the discretionary
spending limits are extended beyond FY2002.
CRS-12

---

IB10096
07-09-02
the most recently adopted budget resolution. Both of these points of order may be waived
by a vote of three-fifths of Senators, or set aside by unanimous consent.
Table 2 provides the timetable for sequestration actions. As indicated, OMB and CBO
publish preview and update sequestration reports to provide Congress and the President with
advance notice regarding the possibility of a sequester. If one or both types of sequester are
anticipated, these reports may afford Congress and the President enough warning so that they
can enact legislation to forestall them. The utility of these reports this year, however, may
depend on whether Congress and the President extend the discretionary spending limits and
the PAYGO requirement beyond FY2002. Only an OMB within-session (noted above) or
final sequestration report can trigger a sequester; the CBO sequestration reports are advisory
only.
Table 2. Timetable for Sequestration Actions
Deadline
Action to be completed
5 days before the President’s
CBO sequestration preview report.
budget submission
Date of the President’s
OMB sequestration preview report (as part of the
budget submission
President’s budget).
August 10
Notification regarding military personnel.
August 15
CBO sequestration update report.
August 20
OMB sequestration update report.
10 days after end of session
CBO final sequestration report.
15 days after end of session
OMB final sequestration report; presidential
sequestration order.
The BEA enforcement procedures, as well as several enforcement procedures tied to the
budget resolution, may be suspended in the event a declaration of war is enacted or if
Congress enacts a joint resolution triggered by the issuance of a “low-growth” report by
CBO.11 With regard to the latter, CBO must notify Congress if actual real economic growth
was less than 1% or estimated real economic growth is projected to be negative for the most
recently reported quarter and the preceding quarter. Upon receiving a low-growth report, the
Senate majority leader is required to introduce a joint resolution suspending the enforcement
procedures, but such action is optional in the House. On January 30, 2002, CBO issued a
low-growth report to Congress (H.Doc. 107-178), and on February 7 the Senate majority
leader subsequently introduced a suspension resolution (S.J.Res. 31). The Senate rejected
by voice vote the suspension resolution on February 14.
11 For further information on these suspension provisions, see CRS Report RS20182, Suspension of
Budget Enforcement Procedures During Hostilities Abroad; and CRS Report RL31068, Suspension
of Budget Enforcement Procedures During Low Economic Growth, both by Robert Keith.
CRS-13

---

IB10096
07-09-02
In previous years, Congress and the President have enacted statutory provisions to avoid
a sequestration for the upcoming fiscal year or to reduce the likelihood of a sequester in
future fiscal years.12 Most recently, the FY2002 Department of Defense Appropriations Act
(P.L. 107-117) included provisions increasing certain discretionary spending limits for
FY2002 and changing the PAYGO scorecard balance to zero for FY2001 and FY2002.
Specifically for the discretionary spending limits, Division C, Section 101(a), of P.L. 107-
117 increased the budget authority and outlay limits for FY2002 in the general purpose
discretionary category to $681.441 billion and $670.206 billion, respectively, and the outlay
limit for FY2002 in the conservation spending category to $1.473 billion. In addition,
Division C, Section 101(d), of the law authorized an estimating adjustment of 0.12% in the
budget authority limit for all categories for FY2002. Such modifications to the discretionary
spending limits and PAYGO scorecard effectively prevented an end-of-the-session sequester
for FY2002.13
LEGISLATION
H.Con.Res. 353, H.Rept. 107-376
Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2003. Adopted by the House on
March 20 by a 221-209 vote. Reported by the House Budget Committee on March 15.
S.Con.Res. 100, S.Rept. 107-141
Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2003. Marked up by the Senate
Budget Committee on March 21, and reported to the full Senate on March 22.
CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS, REPORTS, AND DOCUMENTS
Congressional Budget Office. The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2003-2012.
January 2002. The document is available on CBO’s Web site at [http://www.cbo.gov].
Congressional Budget Office. Analysis of the President’s Budgetary Proposals for Fiscal
Year 2003. March 2002. The document is available on CBO’s Web site at
[http://www.cbo.gov].
U.S. Congress. House. Committee on the Budget. Concurrent Resolution on the
Budget–Fiscal Year 2003. Report to accompany H.Con.Res. 353. 107th Congress, 2nd
session. H.Rept. 107-376. Washington: GPO, 2002.
U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Budget. Concurrent Resolution on the
Budget–Fiscal Year 2003. Report to accompany S.Con.Res. 100. 107th Congress, 2nd
session. S.Rept. 107-141. Washington: GPO, 2002.
12 For detailed information on the several techniques used to avoid a sequester, see CRS Report
RL31155, Techniques for Preventing a Budget Sequester, by Robert Keith.
13 See Office of Management and Budget, OMB Final Sequestration Report to the President and
Congress for Fiscal Year 2002, Jan. 2002.
CRS-14

---

IB10096
07-09-02
U.S. Executive Office of the President. Office of Management and Budget. Budget of the
United States Government, Fiscal Year 2003. Washington: GPO, 2002.
CHRONOLOGY
07-28-2002 – President Bush signed S. 2578, an act to increase the public-debt limit by
$450 billion, into law (P.L. 107-199), following the adoption of the
legislation by the Senate (June 11) and the House (June 27).
06-07-2002 – Senate adopted FY2002 supplemental appropriations act (H.R. 4775, as
amended) by a 71-22 vote.
05-24-2002 – House adopted FY2002 supplemental appropriations act (H.R. 4775, H.Rept.
107-480) by a 280-138 vote.
03-22-2002 – Senate Budget Committee reported its version of the FY2003 budget
resolution (S.Con.Res. 100, S.Rept. 107-141) to the full Senate.
03-21-2002
– President Bush submitted a $27.1 billion emergency
supplemental
appropriations request for FY2002 to provide additional resources for the war
on terrorism, homeland security, and economic recovery.
03-20-2002 – House agreed to its version of the FY2003 budget resolution (H.Con.Res.
353, H.Rept. 107-376) by a 221-209 vote.
03-09-2002 – President Bush signed H.R. 3090, the Job Creation and Worker Assistance
Act of 2002, into law (P.L. 107-147), following the adoption of the
legislation by the House (March 7) and Senate (March 8).
02-04-2002 – President Bush submitted his FY2003 budget to Congress.
FOR ADDITIONAL READING
CRS Report 97-684. The Congressional Appropriations Process: An Introduction, by Sandy
Streeter.
CRS Report 98-721. Introduction to the Federal Budget Process, by Robert Keith and Allen
Schick.
CRS Report RS21175. Perspectives on the Fiscal Year 2003 Budget, by Philip D. Winters.
CRS Issue Brief IB10102. The Budget for Fiscal Year 2003, by Philip D. Winters.
CRS-15

---