Order Code RL30900
CRS Report for Congress
Received through the CRS Web
Macedonia: Country Background and
Recent Conflict
Updated November 7, 2001
Julie Kim
Specialist in International Relations
Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division
Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

---

Macedonia: Country Background and Recent Conflict
Summary
Sharing borders with Kosovo and Serbia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of
Macedonia (FYROM) managed to avoid becoming directly involved in the drawn-out
wars in Bosnia and Kosovo in the 1990s. Inter-ethnic relations between the Slav
majority and ethnic Albanian minority in Macedonia, while often tense, never reached
the crisis state of Albanian-Serb relations in the province of Kosovo. Since
Macedonia’s independence in 1991, ethnic Albanian political parties in Macedonia
have been represented in government and in parliament.
In 2001, ethnic Albanian rebels calling themselves the National Liberation Army
(NLA) stepped up attacks on Macedonian security forces first in several villages near
the city of Tetovo and by the western border with Kosovo, and later near the capital,
Skopje. The NLA is thought to have ties to the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) and
rebel Albanian forces operating in southern Serbia. In March, the Macedonian
government began a counter-insurgency campaign. It opened talks on political
reforms with elected ethnic Albanian representatives, but refused to negotiate with the
rebels themselves. Clashes between the rebels and government forces continued,
notwithstanding intermittent cease-fire agreements and ongoing political talks. With
U.S. and European diplomatic intervention, the parties signed a framework agreement
on August 13, amidst the deadliest violence to date. Deadlock in the Macedonian
parliament over aspects of the accord has delayed implementation of the agreement
by several weeks.
In June, NATO formulated and approved plans to launch a limited operation in
Macedonia to help disarm the rebel forces. The force was not to be deployed until
several preconditions were met, including a durable cease-fire. On August 22, NATO
gave final approval for the deployment of Operation Essential Harvest comprising
about 4,500 troops in total. The operation completed collection of a targeted amount
of rebel weapons on September 26, 2001. NATO then deployed a smaller follow-on
force to provide security for international civilian monitors. NATO’s peacekeeping
force in Kosovo (KFOR) has also been involved in patrolling and reinforcing the
Kosovo border in order to try to cut off Albanian rebel supply routes.
In early 2001, the international community, including the United States,
condemned the violent actions of the Albanian extremists and expressed support for
the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Macedonia, while urging restraint on the
part of the Macedonian forces. At the invitation of President Bush, Macedonian
President Trajkovski came to Washington on May 2, where President Bush
underscored U.S. support for Macedonia’s efforts to resolve the conflict. While not
leading NATO’s Task Force Harvest mission, the United States supported the
operation with medical, intelligence, and logistical assets provided by U.S. military
forces and facilities already stationed in the Balkans. NATO allies have agreed to
replace U.S. armed forces in the NATO Balkans missions if the United States needs
to divert some of them to the anti-terrorist campaign in Afghanistan. U.S. officials
have pressed the Macedonian and Albanian parties to implement the framework
agreement.

---

Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Political Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Macedonian-Albanian Ethnic Tensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Recent Conflict . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
All-Party Coalition and Peace Talks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Peace Agreement - Status of Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Operation Essential Harvest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Extended Military and Civilian Presence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Other International Responses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
KFOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
United Nations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
European Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
U.S. Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

---

Macedonia:1 Country Background and
Recent Conflict
Introduction
For nearly a decade, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia managed to
escape the kind of brutal ethnic conflict in Croatia, Bosnia, and Kosovo that
accompanied the breakup of the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s. The international
community gave high priority to preventing the spread of ethnic conflict to
Macedonia, since it was feared that war in Macedonia could quickly involve some or
all of Macedonia’s neighboring countries and lead to a broader Balkan war.
Macedonia was held up as a model, albeit an imperfect one, of inter-ethnic
coexistence and democratic rule, with active participation of the Albanian community
in political institutions, despite persistent discord in inter-ethnic relations. The swift
emergence in early 2001 of a militant ethnic Albanian guerrilla movement in western
Macedonia therefore caught many observers by surprise.
By March, violent conflict between the rebels and Macedonian security forces
had spread to several areas around the city of Tetovo, prompting the Macedonian
government to embark on a major military campaign to quell the insurgency in
western Macedonia. With strong international backing, the government opened all-
party talks on inter-ethnic issues in April. A new national unity government
comprised of all major political parties was created in May. Clashes between rebel
and government forces continued in some areas of the country, as marathon talks
among all coalition parties on political reforms remained deadlocked. An open-ended
cease-fire agreement reached on July 5 allowed talks to continue, in spite of
intermittent truce violations. Negotiations finally reached agreement on key reform
issues in early August. The political parties signed an agreement on August 13,
paving the way for the deployment of a small NATO force to begin disarming the
rebel forces. Operation Essential Harvest, comprising 4,500 European forces, began
collecting rebel weapons on August 27 and completed its mission within a month. A
much smaller task force remains in Macedonia to provide security for international
civilian monitors overseeing the process of implementing inter-ethnic reforms.
Several factors may have accounted for the emergence of the rebel insurgency
in Macedonia. The primary factor appears to have been the increasing radicalism of
disparate ethnic Albanian militant groups operating in Kosovo, Serbia, and
1This state entered the United Nations in May 1992 under the provisional name “The Former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.” Its name is subject to negotiations under U.N. auspices
between the republic and Greece, which has opposed its northern neighbor’s use of the name
“Macedonia.” For the sake of simplicity, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
(FYROM) shall herein be referred to as Macedonia.

---

CRS-2
Macedonia, many of whom are linked to organized crime and regional smuggling
rings. Some contend that their growing radicalism stems from the unresolved status
of Kosovo and limited progress in realizing Kosovar self-government since the end
of the Kosovar war in mid-1999.2 The international embrace of the post-Milosevic
Yugoslav and Serbian leadership since late 2000 may have discouraged some ethnic
Albanians’ hopes for Kosovar independence, to which the international community
has not agreed. Some observers speculate that Albanian rebels in Kosovo, Serbia, and
Macedonia seek to provoke a heavy-handed response by the Serb or Macedonian
forces, in order to elicit Western sympathy and support. Meanwhile, members of the
Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), who were supposed to have disbanded and given
up their weapons to the NATO-led Kosovo Force (KFOR) by mid-1999, instead
reportedly regrouped in the demilitarized buffer zone around Kosovo and transferred
arms to Macedonia. A contributing factor to the rebellion may have been the
February 2001 border agreement between Macedonia and the Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia (FRY), which tightened border controls and led to greater conflict
between Macedonian border police and ethnic Albanian smugglers. Underlying inter-
ethnic tensions and poor economic conditions (especially among ethnic Albanians) in
Macedonia provide potentially fertile ground for a drawn-out conflict.
Political Background
Macedonia is one of six former republics of the Socialist Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia.3 Under the leadership of Josip Broz Tito, Macedonians were granted the
status of constituent nation, language, and culture equal to that of the other Yugoslav
republics. Following the example of Slovenia, Croatia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina,
Macedonia declared its independence in late 1991 after holding a national referendum
on the issue. Under the provisional name “The Former Yugoslav Republic of
Macedonia,” Macedonia became a member of the United Nations in May 1992. It
subsequently joined several other international organizations under this provisional
name.
Macedonia has a unicameral parliament, the 120-seat National Assembly
(Sobranje), and a popularly elected President. From 1991 to 1999, socialist leader
Kiro Gligorov served as President. Gligorov took credit for Macedonia’s success in
achieving international recognition and for preventing the country from being drawn
into other Yugoslav conflicts.
2U.N. Resolution 1244, which provides for an interim international protectorate for Kosovo,
calls for the province to achieve autonomy within the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. For
additional information see CRS Report RL31053, Kosovo and U.S. Policy, updated regularly.
3Prior to this century, Macedonia had comprised a much larger geographic area. After the
Balkan wars of 1912-1913, Macedonia was partitioned among Bulgaria, Greece, and Serbia.
The Serbian part became the Yugoslav republic of Macedonia.

---

CRS-3
In the last parliamentary
elections held in October and
Macedonia (FYROM) at a Glance
November 1998, the Macedonian
electorate voted out the long-
Area:
25,333 sq. km.; slightly larger
than Vermont
standing former communist
Population:
1.95 million (1994 census)
leadership in favor of a coalition
Ethnic Groups:
Macedonian: 66.5%
headed by the nationalist Internal
Albanian: 22.9%
M a c e d o n i a n R e v o l u t i o n a r y
Turk: 4% Serb: 2%
Roma (gypsies): 2.3%
Organization-Democratic Party for
other: 0.4% (1994 census)
Macedonian National Unity
Religious Groups: Eastern Orthodox: 67%
(VMRO-DPMNE), led by Ljubco
Muslim: 30%
Georgievski. The coalition included
Other: 3%
GDP:
$3.46 billion
the newly formed Democratic
(2000 estimate)
Alternative (DA) party led by Vasil
Leadership
Tupurkovski, and the Democratic
President:
Boris Trajkovski (since 12/99)
Party of Albanians (DPA) led by
Prime Minister:
Ljubco Georgievski (since 11/98)
Arben Xhaferi.4 Coalition tensions,
Sources: Europa World Yearbook 2000; Financial Times Survey
especially between the DA and
(February 19, 2001).
VMRO-DPMNE, persisted (though
the tensions were unrelated to inter-
ethnic issues). The government underwent several cabinet reshuffles and steadily lost
popularity. In the 1999 presidential elections, Boris Trajkovski of the governing
VRMO-DPMNE party narrowly defeated Tito Petkovski of Gligorov’s Social
Democratic Party (SDSM), primarily on the strength of the ethnic Albanian vote.
Some voting irregularities were reported in the presidential vote as well as in late
2000 municipal elections.
In November 2000, the Democratic Alternative party withdrew from the
coalition in an apparent effort to bring down the government and join ranks with the
opposition. However, the Georgievski government quickly replaced the DA with the
small Liberal Party. The new coalition held just under a majority in parliament,
opening the possibility of early elections (the next parliamentary elections were due
in 2002). The government also became plagued with political scandals and low
popularity ratings. However, the opposition was not able to unify as a governing
alternative to the VMRO-DPMNE-led coalition. An all-party coalition replaced the
government in May 2001. Early elections are expected to be held by January 2002.
Formerly the poorest republic in the Yugoslav federation, Macedonia continues
to face economic difficulties stemming from internal reforms, external challenges, and
more recently, internal ethnic conflict. Macedonia’s economy was hit hard by U.N.
sanctions against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) from 1992 to 1996, by
a unilateral Greek trade embargo from 1994 to 1995, and by the Kosovo conflict in
1999. Over 90% of the country’s enterprises have been privatized, but most still
await major restructuring. In line with guidance from the International Monetary
Fund, the Macedonian government maintained a tight monetary policy, resulting in
a sharp drop in inflation and in the budget deficit, but only slight economic recovery.
4The other main ethnic Albanian party, the Party for Democratic Prosperity, served in the
previous leftist government.

---

CRS-4
Macedonia has received little foreign direct investment, although the Georgievski
government managed to secure a landmark investment deal to privatize the country’s
telecommunications utility. Unemployment runs between 25% and 35% of the
workforce. GDP growth, extremely modest in recent years, was forecast to stay level
at about 5% in 2001-2002, but will likely decline by about 4% as a result of the recent
conflict.5 In April 2001, Macedonia became the first southeast European country to
conclude a Stabilization and Association Agreement with the European Union.
However, a donors conference for Macedonia planned for October 2001 was
postponed indefinitely because of Macedonia’s lack of progress in implementing
political reforms.
Macedonia’s military, the Army of the Republic of Macedonia (ARM), has been
undergoing a major restructuring and reform process. Macedonia participates in
NATO’s Partnership for Peace (PFP) program and is among the “Vilnius" group of
ten countries seeking to join NATO. The Army of the Republic of Macedonia
comprises about 15,000 active duty soldiers, 60,000 reserves, and 7,500 paramilitary
police. It is organized into three brigades, including one border guard brigade.6 The
armed forces and police are considered to be poorly trained and equipped mainly with
Soviet-design tanks and some U.S.-made Humvee vehicles. The Macedonian air
force comprises under 700 troops, with only a handful of aircraft and helicopters. In
June 2001, the ARM chief of staff, General Jovan Andrevski, resigned, citing low
troop morale. In August, another armed forces chief of staff, General Pande
Petrovski, resigned after 10 ARM soldiers were killed in a rebel ambush. Since early
2001, Ukraine and Bulgaria have served as Macedonia’s primary arms suppliers. In
addition to the state security structures, media sources have reported the emergence
of several unofficial paramilitary organizations in parts of the country.7 One unit,
known as the “Lions,” is under the command of hardline Interior Minister Ljube
Boskovski.
Macedonian-Albanian Ethnic Tensions
Relations between the Slav Macedonian majority and ethnic Albanian minority
in Macedonia have remained tense since the country’s independence. Though not to
be compared with the situation in Kosovo under Milosevic’s rule, Macedonia has
nonetheless remained a largely segregated country. Albanians in Macedonia as a
whole have demanded greater cultural and educational rights, such as recognizing
Albanian as an official language and providing state support for their underground
Albanian-language university in Tetovo.8 Albanians have sought greater
representation in the government, armed forces and police. They have objected to the
preamble of the constitution which refers to the Macedonian nation, which they
contend relegates Albanians to the status of second-class citizens. They have claimed
5Republic of Macedonia Survey, The Financial Times, February 19, 2001; Macedonia
Country Outlook, Economist Intelligence Unit; Reuters, October 19, 2001.
6The Military Balance, 2000-2001, International Institute for Strategic Studies.
7RFE/RL Balkan Report, Vol. 5, No. 42, June 15, 2001.
8The Macedonian government agreed, under OSCE mediation, to the establishment of a
private Albanian-language university, which has yet to be opened.

---

CRS-5
to represent as much as 40% of the country’s population, not the 22.9% recorded in
the June 1994 census. A new census was scheduled to be held in June 2001, but was
postponed in view of the recent conflict.
In contrast, many Macedonians have asserted that the Albanian minority enjoys
sufficient rights, comparable to or better than other minority communities in Europe.
They have remained suspicious of Albanian demands for autonomy, which they fear
could lead to eventual secession or partition and unification with Albania or Kosovo.
Tensions led to open clashes on several occasions during the 1990s, especially in the
western cities of Tetovo and Gostivar. The conduct of the 1999 presidential
elections, with charges of violence and ballot-stuffing in ethnic Albanian districts,
heightened inter-ethnic tensions, although neither presidential candidate was ethnic
Albanian. In spite of these problems, one of the two major ethnic Albanian parties has
been in the government since Macedonia’s independence, with ethnic Albanian cabinet
ministers.
The conflict in neighboring Kosovo in 1999 exacerbated inter-ethnic tensions in
Macedonia. About 250,000 Kosovar Albanian refugees flooded into Macedonia
during the height of the crisis. Macedonian authorities were at times reluctant to
accept Kosovar Albanian refugees and pressed for many thousands of them to be
evacuated to third countries. The Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) maintained a
presence in Macedonia during the conflict. Macedonian authorities frequently
intercepted and seized weapons deliveries en route to Kosovo.
Recent Conflict

Attacks by ethnic Albanian guerrilla forces on Macedonian police and security
forces in late 2000 and early 2001 appeared to catch the Macedonian government and
international community by surprise. The attacks began in small villages such as
Tanusevci in western Macedonia, close to or on the Kosovo border, where the
Albanian minority is concentrated. In March 2001, clashes spread to the city of
Tetovo (located about 30 km west of the capital, Skopje). After a brief lull, fighting
resumed in several areas, reaching a new level in early June, as rebel forces captured
towns just outside of Skopje and to the north around Kumanovo.
In January, a group calling itself the National Liberation Army (NLA, or UCK
in Albanian) claimed responsibility for the attacks on police forces. Initial reports
gave conflicting information on the NLA. Macedonian President Trajkovski and
Prime Minister Georgievski claimed that the rebels were primarily Kosovo Liberation
Army members who had infiltrated the country from Kosovo. The government
estimated that the rebels numbered only in the hundreds and charged them with trying
to divide the country and create a pan-Albanian state. Macedonian officials blamed
NATO for not doing enough to disarm the Kosovo rebel forces, discourage their
encampment in the buffer zone (Ground Safety Zone) area between Kosovo and
Serbia, or prevent their entry into Macedonia.
Members of the National Liberation Army claimed that the rebel force comprised
a few to several thousand men, mainly from Macedonia. Its leaders include Ali Ahmeti

---

CRS-6
and his uncle, Fazli Veliu, from western Macedonia.9 Ahmeti has claimed that the
rebels’ only objective is to improve the rights of the Albanian community in
Macedonia. On March 19, western news agencies reported a list of political demands
by the NLA rebels that included: international mediation to resolve their differences
with the Slavic majority and determine the exact size of the ethnic Albanian
community; changes in the Macedonian constitution recognizing Albanians as a
constituent people; and, the release of all political prisoners. Rebels said that they
sought the federalization of the country, but not its dismemberment. They called on
all ethnic Albanians in Macedonia to join their ranks, and on ethnic Albanians world-
wide to support their movement with volunteers and funds.10 By August, the NLA
claimed a strength of 16,000, although other estimates suggested they numbered
about 2,000-2,500 full-time NLA combatants.11
Neither of the two main ethnic Albanian political parties initially claimed
association with the NLA. On March 20, the two mainstream ethnic Albanian parties
signed a declaration condemning the use of force in pursuit of political objectives.
However, they have expressed sympathy with the rebels’ demands for Albanian equity
and acknowledge that they risked losing support among ethnic Albanians to the NLA
by appearing to side with the Macedonian authorities. On March 11, a group of
nationalist Albanian politicians (including two members of parliament) launched a new
nationalist Albanian political party called the National Democratic Party. Although
it claimed no direct link to the National Liberation Army, its political manifesto
included demands for the federalization of the country and greater autonomy for the
Albanian population.12 In August, a splinter ethnic Albanian rebel group calling itself
the Albanian National Army (ANA) claimed responsibility for an ambush attack
against a Macedonian army convoy that killed 10 soldiers. The self-styled ANA has
rejected the agreement signed by Macedonia’s political leaders on August 13 and has
pledged to continue to fight for a “greater Albania.”13 Following the terrorist attacks
against the United States on September 11, NLA leaders made clear that they have
no association with Osama bin Laden or any other radical Islamic movements.
In response to the initial rebel attacks, the government made preparations to
launch a military offensive to drive out the rebels out of Macedonian towns and
villages and into Kosovo. President Trajkovski said that the government had first to
“neutralize the terrorist threat,” but offered the prospect of entering into political
dialogue with legitimate political parties on inter-ethnic relations. The government
steadfastly refused to negotiate any terms with “terrorists.” In late March, the
Macedonian armed forces began a series of offensives to regain control of rebel-held
9Many ethnic Albanians from Macedonia volunteered to serve with the KLA during the
Kosovo conflict. See “The Macedonian Question: Reform or Rebellion,” International Crisis
Group Report 109, April 5, 2001.
10“Albanian War Cry Rises Half a World Away, in Staten Island,” The New York Times,
March 19, 2001.
11Jane’s Defense Weekly, August 29, 2001.
12“Formation of new political party in Macedonia concerns NATO leaders,” Knight
Ridder/Tribune Business News, March 12, 2001.
13Reuters, August 16, 2001.

---

CRS-7
villages, mainly around Tetovo. At first, the army encountered little organized
resistance and managed to regain control over some villages.
After a lull of several weeks, during which time the Macedonian and Albanian
political parties launched roundtable discussions, violence resumed in some areas and
began a new stage of the conflict. On April 28, ethnic Albanian guerrillas ambushed
a Macedonian army and police convoy in the village of Vejce near Tetovo, killing
eight and wounding three others. The attack sparked riots by Slav Macedonians
against ethnic Albanian businesses in the southern city of Bitola, near Greece. On
May 3, Albanian rebels launched another ambush on security forces in Vaksince, near
Skopje, killing two Macedonian soldiers and kidnaping a third. In response, the
government deployed helicopters gunships and began counter-attacks against rebel
forces in several villages in the Kumanovo region. During a brief truce in mid-May,
the government declared victory amid reports of widespread desertions among rebel
forces. Sporadic clashes persisted in some villages in the hills above Tetovo.
At the end of May, in the midst of a political crisis within the all-party coalition,
government forces launched another offensive in the north of the country, using long-
range attacks on rebel-held villages. However, government forces were unable to
deal a defeating blow to the rebels, who countered the attacks and advanced toward
Tetovo and Skopje. Five Army soldiers were killed in a rebel attack in Tetovo on
June 6. On June 10, rebel forces captured Aracinovo, on the outskirts of the capital,
threatening the start of an urban warfare-style conflict. On June 11, both sides
announced a cease-fire, which was later extended until June 27. Government forces
ended the truce on June 22 and bombarded rebel territory near Aracinovo.
International leaders decried the resumption of hostilities. Another local cease-fire
arranged by EU envoy Javier Solana included terms for the evacuation of Albanian
guerrilla forces from Aracinovo under international supervision. NATO assisted in
implementing the evacuation; however, clashes resumed in Tetovo and angry
demonstrators in Skopje protested the NATO-assisted escort of armed Albanian
rebels from Aracinovo. On July 1, rebel forces advanced into four more villages
outside of Tetovo, prompting fierce counter-attacks by government forces. NATO
and EU envoys brokered separate open-ended cease-fire agreements on July 5,
granting another chance for the political dialogue to produce results.
Both sides reportedly used the cease-fire to resupply and regroup their forces.
Numerous truce violations were reported. A severe break-down took place in late
July when Albanian rebels advanced into territory around Tetovo. Thousands of Slav
Macedonians fled their homes and dozens were wounded in the offensive. On July
25, NATO secured an agreement with the rebels to reinstate the cease-fire, have the
rebel forces pull back from their advanced positions, and allow displaced persons to
return to their homes. Meanwhile, hundreds of Slav Macedonian protesters in Skopje,
angered by what they perceived to be Western support for the Albanian minority,
attacked the U.S. embassy and other Western missions on July 24.
The deadliest fighting in the conflict occurred in early August, just as political
talks were drawing to a successful close (see next section). On August 7,

---

CRS-8
Macedonian police launched a raid on rebel forces in Skopje, killing five.14 The police
seized a cache of weapons from the rebels and accused them of planning an attack on
the capital. The next day, 10 Macedonian soldiers were killed in a rebel ambush
between Skopje and Tetovo. Angry demonstrators staged violent protests in Skopje,
and battles continued between the rebel and government forces in Tetovo over the
next few days. The Macedonian army deployed fighter jets and reportedly dropped
bombs on rebel-held villages near Tetovo. On August 10, 8 more security forces
were killed after their vehicle struck two land mines outside of Skopje. In a retaliatory
anti-terrorist raid on the village of Ljuboten (near Skopje) on August 12, government
forces killed at least five ethnic Albanians. The government claimed the ones killed
were NLA terrorists engaged in combat, but others claimed they were civilians
executed in cold blood. Another truce was announced on August 12, but fresh clashes
were reported over the next few days, even as political leaders signed a peace
agreement on August 13. Low levels of sporadic fighting have since been reported.
On August 19, NLA leader Ali Ahmeti announced that the rebel group would honor
the peace accord and agreed to surrender weapons to NATO.
An estimated 100 persons have been killed in the conflict since it began in early
2001. About one-third of this total were killed during the final week of peace talks.
The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees has estimated that well over100,000
civilians have left their homes since the beginning of the year, with over 70,000 fleeing
to Kosovo. Several thousand additional Slav Macedonians fled their homes during
the rebel advance around Tetovo in late July. In late August, the NLA released 15
Macedonian that had been held captive. Since the start of the implementation phase
of the peace agreement, sporadic clashes have broken out, but have not led to the
resurgence of sustained conflict.
All-Party Coalition and Peace Talks
From the start of the conflict, Western leaders emphasized that the conflict in
Macedonia required a political solution over a military one. They promoted the
strategy of fostering a meaningful dialogue among all political parties that could lead
quickly to tangible results on minority issues and prevent a longer-term conflict. They
feared that prolonged violent conflict would only further polarize the ethnic
communities, as well as incur greater civilian casualties and humanitarian
consequences.
On April 2, President Trajkovski convened the first meeting of representatives
of all of Macedonia’s political parties to address inter-ethnic issues. The NLA
demanded that it participate in the negotiations, but the Macedonian leadership
steadfastly refused, saying it would only meet with elected representatives. On April
23, at the fifth round of all-party talks, President Trajkovski announced agreement on
several minor issues. The parties agreed to postpone the census, take measures to
encourage displaced persons to return to their homes, and assist in the reconstruction
of homes destroyed during the fighting.
In addition to these talks, the parties discussed the creation of a more inclusive
coalition government. Western leaders had strongly pressed for building a broad
14BBC news online, August 7, 2001.

---

CRS-9
coalition as a first step toward a peaceful resolution to the conflict. Under strong
international pressure, the group of parties agreed to form a national unity
government on May 11, even while a brief cease-fire was unraveling. Parliament
overwhelmingly approved the new government on May 13, by a vote of 104 to 1. The
previous governmental parties (VMRO-DPMNE, DPA, and LP) were joined by the
Social Democratic Alliance of Macedonia (SDSM) and the Party for Democratic
Prosperity (PDP). Ljubco Georgievski remained Prime Minister. Early elections are
to be held before January 27, 2002, if the coalition is able to hold together until then.
Some observers contend that the creation of the all-party government, rather
than promoting unity or compromise, has encouraged greater polarization, since the
parties are looking ahead to the next elections and seeking to consolidate their bases
of support. On May 22, the ethnic Albanian parties met with NLA representatives,
under OSCE auspices, and reached agreement on an amnesty deal for the rebels. The
accord was harshly denounced by the other government parties and by the
international community. Although the talks were facilitated by OSCE envoy Robert
Frowick, a U.S. diplomat, the United States said that it rejected the attempt to bring
the NLA into the negotiating process. Intervention by EU foreign policy chief Javier
Solana prevented a break-up of the coalition, which pledged on May 29 to put aside
the controversial accord and work toward progress on inter-ethnic issues. The ethnic
Albanian parties reportedly remained in close contact with the NLA during the
political negotiations.
On June 8, President Trajkovski presented to parliament a security strategy that
included the offer of a partial amnesty for the NLA. The strategy called first for a
consolidated governmental effort to quell the rebel forces. It then outlined plans to
facilitate the disarmament of the rebel forces and the reconstruction of homes. The
government adopted the plan on June 12. On June 14, President Trajkovski requested
NATO’s assistance in disarming the rebel forces if a political agreement was reached.
Trajkovski opened marathon talks with the political parties on June 15. The focus of
discussions was on changes to the Macedonian constitution that would elevate the
status of the Albanian community. By June 20, however, President Trajkovski
announced that the talks had become “totally deadlocked.” He lay most of the blame
on the Albanian side, claiming that they sought veto powers and intended to turn the
state into a federation of the Slav and Albanian communities. Talks briefly resumed
on June 25, after another cease-fire was reached, but broke up the next day in the
midst of the angry public demonstrations outside of the parliament building in Skopje.
In July, the discussions were revived with the arrival of EU envoy Francois
Léotard and U.S. envoy Ambassador James Pardew. On July 4, the government
agreed to study constitutional reform proposals prepared by outside French counsel.
President Trajkovski announced on July 5 that the political dialogue on reforms had
resumed, corresponding to the latest announced cease-fire. On July 7, peace envoys
Léotard and Pardew presented to the negotiating parties a single framework
document that was to be the basis for further negotiation. The parties agreed to work
from the comprehensive framework document, reportedly based on an earlier
proposal by French constitutional law expert Robert Badinter. Talks resumed on July
9, but quickly stalled as clashes intensified near Tetovo.
Political talks, relocated to the lakeside retreat of Ohrid, resumed on July 28.
On August 1, negotiators announced the first major breakthrough in the talks - a

---

CRS-10
provisional agreement on use of the Albanian language. The parties agreed to allow
Albanian to be considered an official language at the local level in areas where
Albanians comprise 20% or more of the population. The language agreement was to
remain subject to agreement on a final package of reforms. The next equally
contentious item for discussion was the issue of police reform. On August 5, EU
foreign policy chief Javier Solana, during a brief visit to Macedonia, announced that
the parties had come to agreement on increasing Albanian representation in the police,
while keeping the force under central government control. New demands coupled
with renewed violence threatened to derail the talks once more. Nevertheless,
negotiators pressed on and the parties initialed a final political agreement on August
8.
The parties signed the Ohrid agreement in Skopje in a private ceremony on
August 13. The following day, the NLA agreed to surrender its weapons under
NATO supervision. In exchange, the President pledged to grant amnesty to the NLA,
excluding those suspected of war crimes. On August 15, the Macedonian government
formally approved the deployment of a NATO force to collect weapons. The
agreement required that parliament pass constitutional amendments and legislation
implementing the reforms within 45 days.
Peace Agreement - Status of Implementation
Since achieving agreement on the framework peace agreement, both sides have
resisted various aspects of implementation. Extremist elements on both sides may be
more interested in resuming violent conflict than implementing political reforms.
On the Macedonian side, the more nationalist political leaders accused the West
of supporting the Albanian rebel cause and many have become increasingly hostile to
the international community. Prime Minister Georgievski, considered to be among
the most hardline and nationalist Slav Macedonian politicians, referred to the draft
agreement as “shameful” because it came while the rebels still occupied Macedonian
territory. Georgievski has also criticized the small number of weapons that NATO
agreed to collect, calling the disarmament terms “humiliating.”15 On the Albanian
side, the NLA’s exclusion from the political talks was thought to undermine the
rebels’ commitment to disarm. Nevertheless, NLA leaders swiftly agreed to the terms
of the agreement, although most observers doubt they would lack access to arms,
even after the disarmament process was completed. The emergence of another, more
hardline, Albanian rebel group, the self-styled Albanian National Army, pointed to
growing divisions among the Albanian forces. Recurring incidents of violence,
meanwhile, continued to threaten any further progress in implementing peace.
Given this environment, the timetable for parliamentary action was considered
ambitious. The Macedonian parliament opened debate on the Ohrid framework
agreement on August 31, but Speaker Stojan Andov blocked further discussion over
the following weekend in protest of unsuccessful attempts by Macedonian refugees
to return to their homes. On September 4, Prime Minister Georgievski harshly
criticized the agreement, but nevertheless urged the parliament to pass it in order to
15The Washington Post, August 27, 2001.

---

CRS-11
gain international support. After lengthy debates, parliament gave initial endorsement
to the framework plan on September 6 by a vote of 91 out of 112 members present.
The landmark vote paved the way for the 2nd stage of weapons collection by NATO
(see below) and also launched the parliamentary process to consider individual
amendments to the constitution and other laws enhancing minority rights.
Parliament began debates on the amendments on September 13, the day NATO
announced completion of the second of three stages of disarmament. Parliament was
supposed to take a final vote on the entire reform package by September 27, forty-
five days after the August 13 signing of the agreement, and corresponding to the
process of rebel disarmament led by the NATO mission. However, numerous
contentious issues contributed to substantial delays in the parliamentary process.
First, some members of parliament pressed for the consideration of a public
referendum, in order to put the framework agreement’s reforms before public opinion.
Western leaders have criticized the referendum initiative, fearing that it would sink the
peace process and encourage the Albanian rebels to revert to violence. NATO
Secretary-General Lord Robertson, visiting Skopje on September 14, called the
referendum proposal a “peace wrecking amendment,” and said that it was time for
the Macedonian parliament to fulfill their part of the peace deal and pass the
amendments outlined in the peace agreement.
A major concern for the ethnic Albanian side has been the status of granting
amnesty to former members of the NLA. President Trajkovski pledged to grant
former rebels amnesty in August, although this was not formally included in the
framework agreement. On October 9, the government issued a proclamation
endorsing the President’s pledge on amnesty, but the measure was considered to be
unclear as to who would be covered by the amnesty. Many politicians, including
Prime Minister Georgievski, oppose any moves to pardon those they consider to be
“terrorists,” especially in the final months before early elections in January 2002.
Parliament has yet to take up any legislation on granting amnesty to former rebel
fighters. The hardline Interior Ministry has been preparing to prosecute more than
200 former rebel fighters for war crimes and other criminal charges.
In the course of several missions to Macedonia, EU foreign policy chief Solana
and NATO Secretary General Robertson attempted to revive the stalled parliamentary
process of considering the peace agreement’s amendments. In late October, the
Macedonian side insisted on re-opening the wording of the constitution to include
mention of the “Macedonian people” instead of just Macedonia’s citizens, as called
for in the framework agreement. On October 31, the parties pledged to move
forward on each of the amendments and planned to pass an “enabling proclamation”
ratifying the entire reform package on November 12. NATO Secretary General
Robertson warned that further delays would “inevitably” lead to renewed violence.
Parliamentary Speaker Andov expressed confidence that parliamentary approval could
be achieved by November 12.
Operation Essential Harvest
On June 14, President Trajkovski formally requested that NATO assist in
implementing plans to demilitarize the rebel forces. On June 20, NATO members

---

CRS-12
agreed on a “concept of operations” for a NATO mission to send forces to Macedonia
to supervise the disarmament of the rebel groups, once agreement on a peace plan
was reached. In a letter to President Trajkovski, NATO Secretary-General Robertson
reportedly said that the proposed operation would be confined in scope to the
collection of weapons and would be deployed for a limited duration of time.16
On June 29, NATO members gave final approval to the “Essential Harvest”
operational plan. The plan conditioned deployment on a political agreement signed
by the main political parties, a status of forces agreement, an agreement by the rebels
to voluntarily disarm, and a stable cease-fire. Following the signing ceremony for the
peace agreement on August 13, the alliance approved the deployment of a vanguard
team of about 400 troops to Macedonia. On August 20, NATO SACEUR Gen.
Ralston visited Macedonia to assess the state of the truce, the primary pre-condition
yet fully to be achieved.
The North Atlantic Council approved the full deployment of Operation Essential
Harvest on August 22. 11 NATO member states began to deploy a total of about
4,500 troops. Britain led contributions with 1,400 armed forces. Next was Italy, with
800; France, with 550; Germany, with 400; Greece, with 400; Canada and the
Netherlands, each with 200; Spain and Turkey, each with 150; the Czech Republic,
with 125; Belgium, with 100; Hungary, with 50; Norway, with 12; Poland, with 6;
and Denmark, with 1. Major General Gunnar Lange of Norway was the overall force
commander. NATO forces established 15 collection centers to gather and destroy
weapons surrendered voluntarily by the NLA. Estimates on the number of rebel
weapons to be turned in differed widely. The NLA claimed to have about 2,300; the
government’s estimates range from 8,000 to 85,000. Reliable figures on NLA arms
holdings may not even exist, given the group’s lack of an integrated structure.17 On
August 24, NATO and the NLA reached agreement on a target of 3,300 weapons to
be collected. NATO said that the force in Macedonia would only exercise military
force in self-defense and will not seek to impose disarmament by force.
NATO troops in the Task Force Harvest mission began collecting weapons on
August 27 and gathered over 400 weapons that day. One day earlier, the operation
suffered its first casualty, when a British soldier was killed after being struck by a
thrown rock or piece of concrete. Within days, the mission completed the 1st stage
of weapons collection, drawing in 1,210 weapons, or more than one-third of the total
goal. The 2nd stage began on September 7, after parliament voted to approve the
agreement. On September 13, Task Force Harvest announced that it had collected
over two-thirds of the rebels’ weapons, or 2,481 out of 3,300 weapons. After the
third and final stage, over 3,300 weapons had been collected. Lord Robertson noted,
however, that the Macedonian parliament, unlike NATO, had not kept to its schedule
for implementing political reforms. Operation Essential Harvest was completed on
September 26, and its forces redeployed out of the country within a couple of weeks.
NLA leaders claimed they had ordered the full disbandment of its forces on September
27.
16Reuters, June 21, 2001.
17Jane’s Defense Weekly, August 29, 2001.

---

CRS-13
Extended Military and Civilian Presence
From the start of the Essential Harvest operation, many observers expressed
concerns about a potential security vacuum that would result after the planned
departure of NATO forces. They feared the resumption of violent conflict between
the rebel and governmental forces, and pointed to the need for security for
international monitors on the ground. In spite of these concerns, the alliance made
clear that the Essential Harvest operation would adhere to a strict timetable.
Moreover, alliance officials said that NATO had no plans to deploy an extended
peacekeeping operation in Macedonia (“MFOR”) similar to the SFOR or KFOR
operations in Bosnia and Kosovo.
Many in the Macedonian government opposed an extended deployment of
NATO troops in Macedonia which they feared might solidify a territorial division of
the country or prevent Macedonian security forces from reclaiming rebel-held ground.
Macedonian President Trajkovski said he would favor the reintroduction of the U.N.
Preventive Deployment mission to provide security along Macedonia’s borders.
Other options were also considered, such as the creation of an EU force or ad hoc
“coalition of the willing.”
For a variety of reasons, a NATO or NATO-led option gained the most
international support. On September 19, 2001, the Macedonian government formally
requested that NATO provide a “light presence” to protect international monitors in
Macedonia after the completion of Operation Essential Harvest. The North Atlantic
Council approved the Operational Plan for the new mission, dubbed “Amber Fox,”
on September 26. Its mandate is to provide security for international monitors
overseeing implementation of the peace plan. The NAC issued an Activation Order
for Operation Amber Fox on September 27. Task Force Fox is commanded by
German Brig. Gen. Heinz-Georg Keerl. Its consists of about 700 troops (mostly from
Germany and France), to be augmented, if necessary, by 300 additional NATO troops
already in country. The operation’s mandate is for three months, with further
extensions to be considered.
On September 29, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe
(OSCE) agreed to increase four-fold its monitoring mission in Macedonia to 210
observers. The OSCE mission comprises confidence-building monitors, police
advisors, and police trainers. Its current mandate runs until December 31, 2001. In
mid-October, the OSCE began a pilot program on resuming Macedonian police
patrols in formerly rebel-held territory.
Other International Responses
KFOR
Until August 2001, NATO’s presence in Macedonia had derived from its
mandate for the Kosovo Force (KFOR), authorized under U.N. Security Council
Resolution 1244 (1999). KFOR currently comprises about 37,000 troops from
NATO members and partner countries and is commanded by French Lt. Gen. Marcel
Valentin. About 4,000 additional forces have served in the KFOR Headquarters Rear

---

CRS-14
in Skopje, Macedonia, responsible for KFOR communications and logistics in the area
surrounding Kosovo. Several KFOR participating nations in Kosovo also have
National Support Elements in Macedonia. Kosovo’s border with Macedonia runs
about 220 km, or 130 miles. The United States and Germany command KFOR
sectors (Multinational Brigades East and South) that share the Kosovo-Macedonian
border.
In response to the conflict in Macedonia in early 2001, NATO initially took
limited steps to try to quell the violence. The alliance sent military advisors to assist
the Macedonian government respond to the rebel attacks. In March, KFOR began to
increase force levels along the border and intensify border patrolling to detain
suspected rebels and their weapons. KFOR forces have detained about 800 suspected
rebels since June. KFOR has reinforced its forces at the border area with a
peacekeeping reserve of about 300 British and Norwegian infantry troops (dubbed
Task Force Viking). The NAC also endorsed the need for additional troops to be
supplied to KFOR, about two extra battalions (about 1,400 troops). NATO increased
its liaison presence in Skopje and appointed German Ambassador Hans-Joerg Eiff to
be NATO’s senior representative in Macedonia. Through its cooperation and
coordination cell in Skopje, NATO coordinates alliance and direct bilateral military
assistance to Macedonia. NATO political envoy Pieter Feith has played a critical role
in negotiating cease-fire agreements in Macedonia.
Until plans got underway for Operation Essential Harvest, NATO resisted calls
for military intervention in the conflict. NATO SACEUR Gen. Ralston testified
before Congress on March 21 that any additional troops should go toward the KFOR
mission, not a new Macedonia mission. Gen. Ralston advised against an expansion
of the KFOR mission into Macedonia. He pointed out that the Kosovo-Macedonia
border, by virtue of its mountainous terrain, could not be sealed off completely. He
also noted alliance concerns about the security of KFOR’s main supply route through
Macedonia. The Macedonian government’s position on NATO involvement focused
on NATO’s role in stopping the infiltration of rebels and arms from Kosovo, rather
than deployment in Macedonia. Later, both the Macedonian government and the
rebel forces agreed to have NATO assist in implementing plans to demilitarize the
rebel forces. In an unanticipated development, about 80 U.S. forces (as part of
KFOR) in Macedonia helped escort about 300 armed ethnic Albanian rebels from
Aracinovo on June 25. U.S. defense officials said that the incident did not represent
a new mission for U.S. forces serving in KFOR in Macedonia.
In early October, NATO members agreed to consider offering additional armed
forces to the Balkans missions to allow the United States to divert some of its troops,
if necessary, to the anti-terrorist campaign in Afghanistan.
United Nations
From 1993 to 1999, the United Nations maintained a small military presence in
Macedonia of peacekeeping troops under a conflict prevention mandate, the first case
of a preventive deployment of U.N. forces prior to an actual conflict. The United
States contributed hundreds of U.S. armed forces to the U.N. preventive deployment
force for several consecutive years. In early 1999, China vetoed a further extension
of the U.N. mandate in Macedonia, in apparent retaliation for Macedonia’s
recognition of Taiwan, bringing about the end of the U.N. operation in Macedonia.

---

CRS-15
In March 2001, the Macedonian government appealed to the U.N. Security
Council to address the recent conflict. On March 16, the Security Council issued a
state that condemned the “continuing extremist violence” and called it a “threat to the
stability and security of the entire region.” Without making an explicit reference to
Kosovo, the Council said that the violence was “supported from outside the country.”
The U.N. Special Envoy to the Balkans Carl Bildt (of Sweden) expressed extreme
alarm at the situation in Macedonia and urged NATO to take action to seal Kosovo’s
border with Macedonia.
On March 21, the Security Council passed a resolution (Resolution 1345)
condemning the violence and terrorist activities in Macedonia and in southern Serbia.
The resolution notes that the violence has been supported externally by ethnic
Albanian extremists, but does not name Kosovo as the source of the violence. It also
calls on KFOR to further strengthen its efforts to prevent the transfer of arms and
personnel across borders and to confiscate weapons within Kosovo.
The Security Council was not expected to consider authorization for the Task
Force Harvest mission in Macedonia, since the Macedonian government had
requested the deployment and worked out a mutually-acceptable status of forces
agreement. The Security Council welcomed the signing of the peace agreement on
August 13 and called for its “full and immediate implementation.” It condemned the
ongoing violence by extremists.
As debate turned to the possibility of a longer-term NATO military presence in
Macedonia, many countries, including some of the European NATO allies,
recommended U.N. Security Council authorization for such a force.18 Others,
however, considered Macedonia’s official request to NATO to deploy a small, follow-
on force to Macedonia sufficient authorization. Moreover, few countries supported
Macedonian President Trajkovski’s proposal to reinstate the earlier U.N. preventive
deployment mission to take the place of NATO troops in Macedonia. In addition to
requiring new Security Council authorization, such a U.N. force would likely need a
lengthy period of time to organize and deploy. On September 26, the same day that
NATO approved plans to deploy Operation Amber Fox, the Security Council passed
Resolution 1371 on Macedonia. The resolution expressed support for the full and
timely implementation of the framework agreement and endorsed the establishment
of a multi-national security presence in Macedonia.
European Union
The European Union has provided Macedonia with humanitarian and economic
assistance since the 1999 Kosovo crisis. In 2000, the EU provided about $26 million
in assistance to Macedonia. On March 19, 2001, after meeting with Macedonian
Foreign Minister Kerim, EU foreign ministers agreed on a package of measures
intended to support the Macedonian government. The measures included assistance
for border control and for the promotion of inter-ethnic relations. On April 9, 2001,
Macedonia became the first southeast European country to conclude a Stabilization
and Association Agreement (SAA) with the European Union. Part of the EU-led
Stability Pact for southeastern Europe process, the EU established the Stabilization
18Both SFOR in Bosnia and KFOR in Kosovo operate under U.N. mandates.

---

CRS-16
and Association Agreement in order to promote stronger ties with the EU and to
increase assistance to five countries in southeastern Europe, including Macedonia.
The EU has designated about $36 million in assistance for Macedonia for 2001. In
September, EU commissioner Chris Patten signed a financial aid agreement with
Macedonian totaling about $39 million.
The European Union has taken a leading role in international diplomatic efforts
to promote peace in Macedonia. EU foreign policy high representative Javier Solana
and external relations commissioner Chris Patten have made several trips to Skopje
since the conflict began, often in tandem with NATO officials. They have endorsed
the Macedonian government’s measures to counter the Albanian rebel attacks and
supported Skopje’s position on not entering into talks with the insurgents. After
meeting with Macedonian President Trajkovski at an EU summit meeting in
Stockholm on March 23, EU leaders expressed solidarity with the Macedonian
government, urged continued restraint to prevent an escalation of the conflict, and
pledged assistance with border management, refugee support, local government, and
judicial reform, including minority rights. All of Macedonia’s parties, with the
exception of the Party for Democratic Prosperity, met with EU foreign ministers on
April 9, in Luxembourg, on the occasion of signing the Stabilization and Association
Agreement (SAA) with the EU. EU foreign ministers welcomed Macedonia’s
acceptance of a timetable for political reforms under the auspices of the all-party talks
under the leadership of President Trajkovski.
In several successive meetings in Skopje, Solana, Patten, and other EU officials
pressed Macedonia’s political parties to agree to unite in a grand coalition that could
facilitate inter-ethnic relations and build a national consensus on European integration
issues. On June 25, the EU named Francois Léotard, a former French Defense
Minister, to be Special Permanent Envoy for Macedonia. In late October, Leotard
was succeeded by French diplomat Alain le Roy. At the June 25, 2001, ministerial
meeting in Luxembourg, EU foreign ministers warned that future EU economic
assistance to Macedonia would be contingent upon a political settlement to the
conflict. The ministers also stated that prospects for Macedonia’s integration into the
EU would depend on positive results from the political dialogue between the ethnic
groups in Macedonia.
On August 13, the EU welcomed the peace agreement signed by the rival
Macedonian parties and pledged to organize a donors’ conference for Macedonia
once the Macedonian assembly approves and implements the accord. The EU set a
tentative date of mid-October 2001 for the conference, but conditioned it on
parliamentary approval of the constitutional reforms outlined in the framework
agreement. On October 4, the EU announced that the planned donors’ conference
would be postponed indefinitely. Commissioner Chris Patten said it was impossible
to raise donor funds to support an agreement that had not yet been approved or
implemented.
On September 9, the EU endorsed the option of maintaining a NATO presence
in Macedonia beyond the 30-day mandate of Task Force Harvest. The EU rejected
a proposal from EU envoy Léotard to launch an EU force to provide security for an
international monitoring presence. EU countries are providing most of the
international civilian monitors to oversee peace implementation.

---

CRS-17
U.S. Policy
The United States has long maintained that stability in the Former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia is important for Balkan stability and U.S. interests. The
United States recognized the FYROM in early 1994 and established full diplomatic
relations following the September 1995 bilateral agreement reached between Greece
and Macedonia. The Clinton Administration appointed a special envoy to help resolve
the Greek-Macedonian dispute. A U.S. military contingent served in the small U.N.
preventive deployment mission in Macedonia from 1993 until early 1999, when the
U.N. mission was terminated.
Through bilateral economic and military aid programs and support for
multilateral development programs, the United States has supported Macedonia’s
efforts to restructure and stabilize its economy, strengthen democratic institutions,
and integrate into European structures. During a visit to Macedonia in June 1999,
President Clinton expressed thanks to the Macedonian government for its response
to the Kosovo conflict and support of the NATO mission on its territory. The United
States has provided over $147 million in SEED Act funds to Macedonia through
FY2000, not including several millions more in emergency humanitarian aid and
security assistance. For FY2001, the United States provided an estimated $38 million
in bilateral SEED Act assistance, and about $17 million in military aid to Macedonia.
This total included designations of $3.5 million in tactical communications equipment
for the Macedonian Army, $4 million for a military training program, and $5.5 million
in expanded bilateral non-military assistance.19 For FY2002, the Administration has
requested an increase in bilateral SEED Act assistance to Macedonia to about $45
million, and $11 million in military assistance. In March, the Administration agreed
to supply a unit of U.S. Predator unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to Skopje to assist
NATO in aerial reconnaissance, and to increase intelligence-sharing with the
Macedonian government.
On March 23, 2001, President Bush issued a statement strongly condemning the
violence by the Albanian extremists and supporting the actions of the Macedonian
government. Bush encouraged the government to act with restraint and to work with
elected Albanian representatives to address legitimate concerns of the ethnic Albanian
community. On April 12, Powell traveled to Macedonia to underscore U.S. support
for the government’s efforts to resolve the country’s differences peacefully. Powell
extended to President Trajkovski an invitation from the White House to meet with
President Bush on May 2. In Washington, Trajkovski met with President Bush,
Secretary Powell, and Defense Secretary Rumsfeld. President Trajkovski requested
that the United States designate the NLA a terrorist organization. President Bush
announced a $10 million aid commitment over four years to support the new
multilingual university in Tetovo. On May 11, the Bush Administration welcomed the
formation of the wider government coalition in Macedonia and urged it to accelerate
progress in advancing inter-ethnic reforms. During President Bush’s trip to Europe
in June 2001, the President consulted on Macedonia with the NATO allies, the
European Union, and with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Bush said that the
United States and Russia shared the common interest of securing a stable Macedonia.
19Fact Sheet: U.S. Support for Macedonia, The White House, June 2, 2001.

---

CRS-18
Bush expressed strong support for the intensified political process underway to
achieve greater minority rights in Macedonia.
President Bush welcomed the August 13 signing of the peace agreement but
called on the parties to lay down their weapons in order to implement the deal. A
White House statement said that “the cease-fire must be respected, the insurgents
must disarm and disband, and Macedonia’s Assembly must adopt the necessary
constitutional amendments and legislation.” On August 14, the White House reported
that President Bush had telephoned President Trajkovski to offer strong support to
the Macedonian government as it moves forward to achieve peace.
About half of the border between Kosovo and Macedonia lies in the U.S.-led
sector of KFOR. In total, three battalions, or about 5,500 U.S. forces (about 14% of
the total), serve in KFOR. In addition, the United States maintains Camp Able
Sentry, a logistics unit in Macedonia (formerly with about 500 U.S. armed forces)
supporting U.S. forces in KFOR. On July 25, an elite U.S. Marine Corps team was
sent to Skopje to enhance security at the U.S. embassy after it came under attack by
angry protesters. On July 31, the Pentagon announced that about 200 U.S. military
and civilian personnel were being temporarily relocated to Kosovo in view of the
security situation in Macedonia.
In June, the Administration reportedly told its allies in NATO that it did not want
to contribute U.S. armed forces to a proposed NATO disarmament mission in
Macedonia, although it would not object to the creation of such a mission by other
countries.20 On June 27, President Bush said that he would not rule out the possibility
that U.S. armed forces might be sent to Macedonia, and that no option was “off the
table.” The Administration has said that the United States would participate in the
force in ways involving logistics, command and control, communications, and
intelligence, largely utilizing U.S. military assets already on the ground in the
Balkans.21 In August, the Pentagon specified that U.S. military personnel and
facilities in Kosovo and Macedonia would provide medical, intelligence, and logistical
support to the Essential Harvest mission, in addition to their duties as part of KFOR.22
No U.S. troops have taken part in the weapons collection process, nor have additional
U.S. armed forces been sent to the region to assist the Essential Harvest operation or
reinforce the existing U.S. presence in the Balkans. U.S. intelligence assessments
have reportedly concluded that a continued NATO presence in Macedonia is
necessary to avoid a collapse of the peace agreement.23
On June 27, President Bush also approved of measures intended to isolate and
sanction extremist forces in the Balkans, including members of the NLA. These
included the blocking of assets and property of named extremist groups and
individuals, and prohibiting U.S. payments to these groups and individuals. The
20“U.S. doesn’t want to join any NATO mission into Macedonia,” The New York Times, June
16, 2001.
21Defense Secretary Rumsfeld media availability, July 9, 2001; Department of State daily
press briefing, August 2, 2001.
22Department of Defense news briefing, August 16, 2001.
23The New York Times, September 4, 2001.

---

CRS-19
President also barred from entry into the United States certain individuals responsible
for actions that threaten peace and stability in the Balkans.
Following the September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States, U.S. envoy
James Pardew said that the United States would remain firmly committed to and
focused on the peace process in Macedonia.24 He said that neither changes in U.S.
policy toward Macedonia nor delays in the timetable for the peace process should
result from the terrorist assault on the United States. U.S. and other NATO
representatives have discounted accounts in the Macedonian press alleging contacts
between the NLA and Osama bin Laden. While the Administration has not expressed
any plans to withdraw from the Balkans missions, it has requested that the the
European allies replace any U.S. armed forces that may be diverted from the Balkans
to the U.S.-led operation in Afghanistan. Secretary of State Colin Powell reportedly
wrote to Macedonian President Boris Trajkovski on November 6 to press for swift
passage of the constitutional reforms called for in the framework agreement.
In Congress, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee held a hearing on
Macedonia on June 13, 2001. Ambassador James Pardew, Senior Advisor at the
State Department, outlined the Administration’s strategy with regard to Macedonia.
He said that the United States supported President Trajkovski’s strategy for peace
and the inter-ethnic dialogue on political reforms. The United States would also
continue U.S. bilateral assistance to Macedonia to promote inter-ethnic relations and
to enhance the capabilities of the Macedonian security forces. Committee Chairman
Sen. Biden expressed concern about the United States not taking on a leadership role
in the Macedonian conflict. He cited the inability of past European efforts to resolve
earlier conflicts in the Balkans.
On March 13, 2001, Representative Bereuter introduced a bill, H.R. 982, on the
southern Balkan situation. H.R. 982 would prohibit U.S. assistance for Kosovo
unless the President certified that Kosovo residents were not supporting ethnically-
motivated violence in Macedonia or in southern Serbia. The resolution was referred
to the House Committee on International Relations. On June 22, Senator McConnell
introduced S. Res. 115, a resolution encouraging a lasting cease-fire and a political
solution to the crisis in Macedonia.
24Associated Press, September 19, 2001.

---

CRS-20
S o f i a
S e r b i a
Kriva Palanka
B u l g a r i a
Kumanovo
Tetovo
Skopje
Delcevo
Kocani
T h e F o r m e r
Kadrifakovo
Gostivar
Stip
Titov Veles
Yu g o s l a v
Radovis
R e p u b l i c
Kicevo
Debar
Negotino
Strumica
Rusjaci
Kavadarci
A l b a n i a
o f
Prilep
Lake
M a c e d o n i a
Doiran
Struga
Gevgelija
Ohrid
Lake
Resen
Suvodol
Ohrid
Bitola
Lake
Prespa
Vojvodina
Romania
G r e e c e
Serbia
Montenegro
Bulg.
Map adapted by CRS from Magellan Geographix.
Kosovo
Macedonia
Albania
Greece

---