< Back to Current Version

Senate Committee Hearings: Arranging Witnesses

Changes from March 12, 2015 to December 6, 2017

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


Senate Committee Hearings: Arranging Witnesses

March 12, 2015December 6, 2017 (98-336)

SelectingSelecting witnesses is one of the most important aspects of planning a Senate hearing. Committees and subcommittees pay careful attention to which viewpoints will be represented, who should testify, and the order and format for presenting witnesses. A witness must be invited by a committee in order to testify; standing. Standing committees and their subcommittees may also subpoena reluctant witnesses.1

Selecting and Inviting Witnesses

To testify, a witness must be invited by a committee. Before officially inviting a witness, committee staff identify and often interview prospective witnesses. Committees consider people from different backgrounds, including individuals from the executive branch, state and local governments, academia, business, and interest groups as well as other private citizens. A committee may invite as many witnesses as it chooses and may schedule multiple days of hearings.

Generally, committees strive to ensure that a range of views are represented, but a committee may decide to invite witnesses expressing only particular points of view or who will speak to specific elements of the hearing's topic. Senate rules allow the minority-party Membersmembers of a committee (except Appropriations) to call witnesses of their choice on at least one day of hearings if a majority of the minority Membersmembers make this request to the committee chair before completion of the hearing (Rule XXVI, paragraph 4(d)).21 This rule is infrequently formally invoked; typically the Members. Typically, the members of a committee from each party work together informally to invite witnesses representing various views. Note that some committees follow additional rules or practices in selecting witnesses.3

2

Once witnesses are identified, the committee chair usually sends each witness a formal letter of invitation. This letter generally provides the witness with basic information on the proposed hearing, including its purpose, subject, date, time, and location. In addition, the letter might indicate any limitation on the length of a witness's oral testimony.

The committee might also send a witness additional information. This information could include a list of committee Membersmembers, the committee's rules, a copy of any relevant measure (for legislative hearings), and background information on the issue. The letter of invitation can specify any requirements for the transmission of written testimony to the committee, including explanation of deadlines for its submission. (Under Senate rules, written testimony is to be submitted at least one day before a witness testifies, except before the Appropriations Committee [Rule XXVI, paragraph 4(b)].) A committee may reimburse a witness for certain expenses related to testimony; if. If reimbursement is expected, the letter of invitation might address this issue.43 Often, the letter indicates a committee staff contact. Committee staff will sometimes communicate or meet with witnesses prior to a hearing to answer questions and to review procedure.

Subpoena Power5

4

Most individuals respond favorably to an invitation to testify, believing it to be a valuable opportunity to communicate and publicize their views on a question of public policy. However, if a person declines to appear by invitation, a standing committee or its subcommittees may require a witness to appear by issuing a subpoena (Rule XXVI, paragraph 1). Committees may also subpoena documents. Subpoenas are most common at investigative hearings.

The rules of many committees delineate specific procedures for authorizing a subpoena. Some committees delegate this authority to the chair and ranking minority Membermember (or, in some committees, under limited circumstances, to the chair alone), while other committees require a majority of the committee to either authorize the subpoena or to provide such authority to the chair. Still other committees allow subpoenas to be authorized by either committee leaders or a committee majority or provide for other relevant procedures.

Format and Order of Witness Testimony6

5

Committees determine the format and order of witness testimony. Typically, a witness testifying alone makes a statement and then responds to questions from committee Membersmembers. Committees may also employ a panel format, often for witnesses with divergent viewpoints. It is normally the practice in this case for all panel members to make statements, then for committee Membersmembers to pose questions to the panel or to various panelists. Some observers believe this format stimulates debate and elicits more pertinent information. Committees sometimes use other formats for gathering information, such as joint hearings, field hearings, seminars, "roundtable" discussions, and video conferencing with witnesses who are not able to attend the hearing in person.

The order in which witnesses testify is arranged at the discretion of the committee. Protocol dictates that a Member of Congress generally testifies before other witnesses, and a similar privilege is often extended to high-ranking executive branch officials and to former Members and other high-level government officials. Celebrity witnesses may be judiciously placed in the lineup to generate media coverage and public attention to an issue. Testimony from academics, interest group representatives, and other private citizens may be arranged to ensure that committee Membersmembers hear different perspectives in a particular order—for instance, to allow one individual to respond to arguments made by another.

Author Contact Information

[author name scrubbed], Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process ([email address scrubbed], [phone number scrubbed])
Acknowledgments

This report was originally written by [author name scrubbed], former analyst in American National Government at CRS, and was later updated by [author name scrubbed], former analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process at CRS. The author currently listed has updated this report and is available to answer questions on the subject.

Footnotes

1.

For details on the hearing process, see archived CRS Report RL30548, Hearings in the U.S. Senate: A Guide for Preparation and Procedure.

2.

For more details on this "minority witness rule," see CRS Report RS22649, Senate Committee Hearings: The "Minority Witness Rule", by [author name scrubbed].

32.

For instance, rules of the Finance Committee direct staff to try "to schedule witnesses so as to attain a balance of views early in the hearings." In addition, the committee explicitly allows every Member of the committee to choose witnesses to testify (Senate Finance Committee Rule 14 (d)).

43.

Staff are encouraged to consult with the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration in relation to regulations governing use of committee funds for witness expenses.

54.

For more information on the use of subpoenas in the legislative processcongressional subpoenas, see CRS Report RL30240, Congressional Oversight Manual, by [author name scrubbed] et al., and CRS Report RL34114RL34097, Congress's Contempt Power and the Enforcement of Congressional Subpoenas: A Sketch, by [author name scrubbed] andLaw, History, Practice, and Procedure, by [author name scrubbed].

65.

For more information on witness testimony and associated rules and practices, see CRS Report 98-392, Senate Committee Hearings: Witness Testimony, by [author name scrubbed].